Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Diffusion tensor imaging in middle-aged headache sufferers in the general population: a cross-sectional population-based imaging study in the Nord-Trøndelag health study (HUNT-MRI)

The Journal of Headache and Pain volume 20, Article number: 78 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Several studies have investigated white matter with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in those suffering from headache, but so far only in clinic based samples and with conflicting results.

Methods

In the present study, 1006 individuals (50–66 years) from the general population (Nord-Trøndelag Health Study) participated in an imaging study of the head at 1.5 T (HUNT-MRI). Hundred and ninety-six individuals were excluded because of errors in the data acquisition or brain pathology. Two hundred and forty-six of the remaining participants reported suffering from headache (69 from migraine and 76 from tension-type headache) the year prior to the scanning. DTI data were analysed with Tract-Based Spatial Statistics and automated tractography. Type of headache, frequency of attacks and evolution of headache were investigated for an association with white matter fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axonal diffusivity (AD), radial diffusivity (RD) and tract volume. Correction for various demographical and clinical variables were performed.

Results

Headache sufferers had widespread higher white matter MD, AD and RD compared to headache free individuals (n = 277). The effect sizes were mostly small with the largest seen in those with middle-age onset headache, who also had lower white matter FA. There were no associations between white matter microstructure and attack frequency or type of headache.

Conclusion

Middle-age onset headache may be related to a widespread process in the white matter leading to altered microstructure.

Background

Neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that primary headache disorders, e.g. migraine and tension-type headache (TTH), are not just paroxysmal conditions with no structural abnormalities of the brain. Ischemic strokes and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) have been reported to be more prevalent in those with migraine, in particular with aura, than in healthy controls [1, 2]. A previous study in the present population could not corroborate this, but found that those with TTH had more WMH than those without headache [3]. Quantitative brain measures have also been investigated. Several clinic-based studies have reported differences in cortical volume or thickness between those with and without headache, albeit not confirmed in the general population [4]. The relationship between headache and white matter (WM) microstructure has been examined with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) but so far only in small clinic-based samples and with inconclusive results [5].

Several measures can be obtained from DTI that provide information on the white matter microstructure [6]. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a scalar (range 0–1) that describes to which degree the diffusion is anisotropic. An FA value of 0 is present when the diffusion is isotropic (i.e. equal in all directions), which is the case for cerebrospinal fluid. An FA value of 1 on the other hand, is present when the diffusion occurs along one axis. Mean diffusivity (MD) is the total non-directional diffusion, axonal diffusivity (AD) is the diffusion along WM tracts and radial diffusivity (RD) is the diffusion perpendicular to AD, i.e. across WM tracts.

Three previous studies reported no differences in DTI indices between migraine patients and controls using Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) [7, 8] or a region-of-interest approach (in the internal capsule and subcortical WM) [9]. The participants were in early adulthood or middle-aged, and WMH were corrected for. Similar, Liu et al. [10] followed 36 individuals newly diagnosed with migraine without aura and found no changes in WM FA, MD, AD or RD after 1 year.

Several other studies have found differences in WM microstructure between headache patients and controls. Three studies reported higher MD or RD in migraine patients compared to controls in early adulthood using TBSS [11] or DTI tract-average values [12, 13]. In contrast, other studies using TBSS reported migraineurs in their teens or early adulthood to have lower MD or RD in several WM regions compared to controls [14,15,16,17] and one study [14] also reported decreased AD in several WM regions in migraineurs. In contrast to the conflicting MD, AD and RD results, lower FA has consistently been reported in migraine patients [11, 13, 16,17,18,19,20]. No study has investigated the relationship between WM microstructure and TTH.

Common to all previous studies is the use of clinical samples making them vulnerable to selection bias. This may explain the conflicting results. Furthermore, the samples were relatively small (typically 20 cases and 20 controls) increasing the likelihood of the samples not being representative and rendering them unable to detect potentially small but actual differences [21]. Most of the studies reporting differences in WM microstructure did not correct their analyses for WMH [11, 14, 15, 18,19,20, 22, 23], which is known to influence DTI measures [24].

The present study aimed to investigate WM microstructure in those suffering from headache in a large sample from the general population where correction for several demographical and clinical variables were available. Type of headache (migraine or TTH), frequency of headache attacks, and evolution of headache complaints were investigated for a relationship with regional WM microstructure with TBSS. To examine if potential regional differences in white matter microstructure could be reflected at the level of WM tracts, tract volumes and tract-average values of DTI indices were obtained with automated tractography and compared between groups.

Methods

Cohort

The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (Norwegian acronym HUNT) is an on-going large population-based study across several waves: 1984–1986 (HUNT1), 1995–1997 (HUNT2), 2006–2008 (HUNT3) and presently (HUNT4) in the county of Trøndelag (formerly Nord-Trøndelag), Norway. In a neuroimaging sub-study of HUNT3 (HUNT-MRI), 1006 individuals (530 women) between 50 and 66 years who had previously participated in HUNT1, HUNT2 and HUNT3, and lived within 45 min of the location of the scanning, underwent brain imaging with a standardized MRI protocol. Exclusion criteria were restricted to standard safety contraindication to MRI, i.e. pacemaker, severe claustrophobia or body weight above 150 kg. The scanning took place between the 21st of July 2007 and the 10th of December 2009. The mean time from answering the questionnaire in HUNT3 and being scanned was 1.2 years. Details about the imaging procedure and the recruitment of participants to the HUNT-MRI study have been published previously [25]. Compared to the general population, the participants of the HUNT-MRI study had possibly somewhat reduced risk of cardiovascular disease [25].

Headache diagnoses

Based on their answers (“yes/no”) to the initial screening question of a headache questionnaire (“have you suffered from headache during the last 12 months?”), HUNT3 participants were classified as either headache sufferers or headache nonsufferers. Suffering from any headache had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 86% [26]. Headache sufferers were further asked to answer 13 headache questions designed to determine whether the person suffered from migraine or TTH. The migraine and TTH diagnoses were based on the criteria of the 2nd edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-II). However, since the infrequent TTH diagnosis had a low specificity, only those with headache ≥1 day per month were given the TTH diagnosis [26]. For migraine, the sensitivity was 51% and the specificity was 95% and for TTH the sensitivity was 96% and the specificity was 69% [26]. Headache sufferers not fulfilling the criteria of either migraine or TTH were categorized as having unclassified headache. In the present study no analyses were performed on this group separately. Headache sufferers in HUNT3 were also categorized into four separate groups based on the frequency of headache attacks (< 1 day/month; 1–6 days/month; 7–14 days days/month; > 14 days/month).

Information on evolution of headache status was based on identical headache screening questions in HUNT2 and HUNT3. Participants who had answered both questionnaires were categorized into four mutually exclusive categories: previous headache (headache in HUNT2 but not in HUNT3), new onset headache (no headache in HUNT2 but headache in HUNT3), persistent headache (headache in both HUNT2 and HUNT3) and headache free (headache in neither HUNT2 nor HUNT3).

Demographical and clinical variables

As part of the HUNT surveys demographics and health related data were collected with questionnaires and various supplementary investigations. In the present study a selection of variables was used to highlight similarities and differences between the various headache groups and the headache free and between the four headache attack frequency groups. Information on age (continuous), sex (dichotomous), body mass index (BMI, continuous), blood pressure (continuous), non-fasting glucose (continuous), cholesterol (continuous), smoking (dichotomous), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS, continuous), chronic pain (body pain for more than 6 months, dichotomous) and consumption of alcohol (ordinal from 1 [never] to 8 [4–7 times/week] but dichotomized at ≥1/week for these analyses) and over-the-counter painkillers (dichotomous) was collected from the HUNT3 survey. Information on education (dichotomous) was collected from the HUNT2 survey. Differences in age were evaluated with independent t-tests and differences in sex were evaluated with χ2 tests. Analysis of Covariance or binary logistic regression, corrected for age and sex, was used to investigate for differences in the other variables. The analyses were carried out in SPSS version 25 and thresholded at P < 0.05 (two-tailed).

MRI scanning

All MRI examinations were performed on the same 1.5 T General Electric Signa HDx scanner equipped with an eight-channel head coil and software version pre-14.0 M (GE Healthcare). All participants underwent the same scan protocol and no scanner updates were performed during the HUNT-MRI study. In the present study, data from the T1-weighted volume, transverse T2, FLAIR and DTI sequences, were used. Scan parameters for the T1, T2 and FLAIR sequences are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. The DTI sequence was a single-shot balanced-echo EPI acquired in 40 non-colinear directions with b = 1000 s/mm3 and 5 b = 0 images using the following parameters: TR = 13,500 ms, TE = 104 ms, FOV 240 × 240 mm, slice thickness 2.5 mm, acquisitions matrix 96 × 96. The images were automatically zero-padded in k-space from 96 × 96 to 256 × 256 and reconstructed giving a resolution of 0.9275 × 0.9275 × 2.5 mm3. 60 transversal slices with no gaps were acquired giving full brain coverage.

White matter hyperintensities and intracranial volume

Using the FLAIR images, the load of hemispheric WMH was evaluated by an experienced neuroradiologist, blinded to headache status, using the Fazekas scale (0–3) [3]. Intracranial volume (ICV) was estimated in Statistical Parametric Mapping 8 with an automated version of the reverse brain mask method using the T1 and T2 images [27].

DTI analysis

DTI analysis was performed with two methods: TBSS (FMRIB Software Library (FSL), The Oxford Centre for functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Oxford, UK; www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl) and an automated tractography method [28]. Common to both methods, image artefacts due to motion and current distortions were minimized by registration of the DTI acquisition to the b = 0 image using affine registration.

TBSS analyses

The brain was extracted using the Brain Extraction Tool (BET, part of FSL). The FMRIBs Diffusion Toolbox (FDT) was used to fit a diffusion tensor to the raw diffusion data. Voxel-wise maps of the FA, MD, AD and RD were calculated for the headache and control groups. Voxel-wise statistical analysis of the diffusion data was performed using TBSS [29, 30]. Briefly, all subjects’ FA data were aligned into a common space using the nonlinear registration tool FNIRT [31, 32] (which uses a b-spline representation of the registration warp field [33]). A mean FA image was created from all the FA images and thinned to create a skeletonized mean FA representing the centers of all tracts common to all the subjects in the analysis. The mean FA skeleton was thresholded to FA ≥ 0.2 to include major WM tracts but exclude peripheral tracts and grey matter. Each subject’s aligned FA data were then projected onto this skeleton. The skeletonization process was also applied to MD, AD and RD, and the statistical comparisons of these data were then restricted to voxels in the WM skeleton. The resulting skeletonized data were consequently fed into voxel-wise cross-subject statistics in Randomise as described below.

Automated tractography

The automated tractography segmentation procedure applied in the present study have been described previously [34]. Briefly, q-ball reconstruction was used to parameterize voxel diffusion profiles, and up to three principal diffusion directions were determined for each voxel [35]. The Camino package was used to generate streamlines using the interpolated deterministic streamlining method, with an FA threshold of 0.15. All voxels with an FA value > 0.25 were used as seed values.

The mean b = 0 volumes were registered to the MNI152 template using FLIRT. A custom group template was created by averaging the registered volumes. The b = 0 volumes were then nonlinearly registered to the template with FNIRT and the deformation fields produced by FNIRT was used to warp the streamlines from each subject to the group template.

To find consistent bundles of streamlines across subjects an approach previously described by Visser et al. was used [28]. Before clustering, all streamlines were linearly resampled to 25 points, and the streamlines from all subjects were concatenated. Clustering was performed on the merged data set consisting of streamlines from all subjects. The multisubject data set was randomly partitioned into subsets of 10,000 streamlines, and in each of these subsets 250 clusters were identified by using hierarchical clustering. The clustering step was repeated 100 times with different random partitions to obtain a stable segmentation by selecting the cluster assignments that occurred most often for each streamline to find statistics indicating the consistency of these assignments between repetitions. Based on anatomical knowledge, WM tracts were identified in 10 randomly selected individuals by manually assigning the sets of labels (from the 250 labels) that corresponded to the following WM tracts: corpus callosum (CC), cingulate (CING), corticospinal tract (CST), inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF), optic radiation (OR), superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), and uncinate fasciculus. For each subject, the clusters were extracted with pruning (thresholding). Regions of interests (ROIs) were made for the fiber tracts and converted into subject diffusion space to extract mean FA, MD, AD and RD for each tract. Tract volume was calculated for each WM tract by adding the number of voxels containing at least one streamline and multiplying by voxel volume. It is important to note that this value reflects the number of voxels within the tract that exceeded the tracking FA threshold and might deviate from the actual volume. The diffusivity indices and volumes for the tracts in the left and right hemispheres were merged and imported into SPSS version 25.

Statistical approach to DTI measures

In the present study, several group comparisons were performed. First, those suffering from any headache (in HUNT3) were compared to the headache free group. Second, the following five headache subcategories were compared to the headache free group: migraine, TTH, previous headache, new onset headache and persistent headache. Third, those with migraine were compared to those with TTH. Fourth, correlation analyses between the frequency of headache attacks and the DTI indices were performed. All these analyses were initially corrected for age and sex (and ICV in the volume analyses) (Model 1) but rerun three times to correct for variables that were thought to possibly affect the results. First, since WMH affects the integrity of WM [24], the Fazekas score was added as a covariate (Model 2). Second, the Fazekas score was excluded as a covariate and clinical variables that were found to be significantly different between the headache sufferers and the headache free (HADS score, presence of chronic pain and consumption of alcohol [the ordinal variable] and over-the-counter painkillers) were added (Model 3). Third, both the Fazekas score and the clinical variables were added as covariates (Model 4).

The Randomise tool in FSL was used to conduct permutation-based non-parametric tests to investigate spatial differences in DTI indices in WM obtained with TBSS [36]. Threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE), corrected for multiple comparisons with family-wise error rate (FWE) and thresholded at P < 0.05 (two-tailed), was used to investigate group differences in WM FA, MD, AD and RD. Tract-average values and tract-volumes obtained with automated tractography were analysed with ANCOVA in SPSS version 25. P-values were considered significant at a 0.05 level (two-tailed). In total 1280 comparisons were performed in the automated tractography analyses. The volume analyses were corrected for ICV. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) were calculated from the TBSS and automated tractography analyses.

Results

Basic characteristics of the present population

Of the 1006 MRI examinations, 97 had missing DTI (due to empty folders, no DTI acquisition or abrupted DTI acquisition) and 32 were excluded due to DTI artefacts (ghosting, signal void or deformation). Of the 877 successful DTI scans, 2 individuals with multiple sclerosis were excluded and another 65 individuals were excluded due to pathology [37]. Some of the included individuals had minor intracranial abnormalities (Additional file 2: Table S2 and Additional file 3: Table S3). In total, 810 participants had successful DTI scans and were eligible for inclusion in the present study. However, since some of these participants did not fulfil the criteria for inclusion in one of the headache categories because of lacking data in either HUNT2 or HUNT3, the total number of included participants was 640.

Tables 1 and 2 shows the basic characteristics of the present headache groups. Except for the new onset headache group, all headache groups had a significantly higher percentage of women than the headache free group. The any headache, migraine and persistent headache groups also included individuals that were significantly younger and had a lower consumption of alcohol than the headache free group. Except for the previous and new onset headache groups, all headache groups had a higher HADS score than the headache free group. Headache sufferers used significantly more over-the-counter painkillers than the headache free, whereas no significant differences were found with regard to BMI, blood pressure, non-fasting glucose, cholesterol, daily smoking or level of education. HADS scores, the presence of chronic pain and consumption of over-the-counter painkillers showed a significant positive association with frequency of headache attacks.

Table 1 Basic characteristics of participants in the present study
Full size table
Table 2 Basic characteristics of the present headache sufferers based on the frequency of headache attacks
Full size table

The WMH load was similar in the different headache groups and the headache free group and was not correlated with the frequency of headache attacks (Additional file 4: Table S4). The frequency of headache attacks was quite similar across the headache groups. Still, headache < 1 day/month seemed to be slightly more common for those with new onset headache. Note that owing to the diagnostic criteria, none of those with TTH had headache < 1 day/month (Additional file 5: Table S5).

TBSS analyses corrected for age and sex (model 1, Fig. 1)

The any headache group had significantly higher MD, AD and RD compared to the headache free group. The higher MD and AD were present in all major WM tracts, whereas higher RD was present in most major WM tracts. Those with migraine or TTH had higher AD than headache free in several areas of the TBSS skeleton, most prominent in CC, CST, IFOF, ILF and left SLF. Individuals with previous headache had widespread higher MD and AD in all major WM tracts compared to the headache free, whereas those with persistent headache had higher AD than the headache free, mostly in the left hemisphere in CST, IFOF, ILF and SLF. Those suffering from new onset headache had significantly higher MD, AD and RD and significantly reduced FA in all major WM tracts compared to the headache free. There were no differences in any of the DTI indices between migraine and TTH and no correlation between any of the DTI indices and frequency of headache attacks.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Between group differences in white matter FA, MD, AD and RD in the TBSS analyses. Significance level was P < 0.05 (two-tailed) corrected for age and sex and multiple comparisons with Threshold Free Cluster Enhancement and Family-Wise Error rate as implemented in Randomise. To improve visualization, the group differences were “thickened” using the tbss_fill script in FSL. The FSL 1 mm mean FA template was used as background image

Full size image

TBSS analyses corrected for age, sex and WMH (model 2, Fig. 2)

Adding the Fazekas score as a covariate decreased the number of voxels with higher MD and AD in the any headache group compared to the headache free group, and the RD differences became insignificant. Similarly, the extent of higher AD in migraineurs compared to the headache free decreased (now present mostly in CST) and higher AD in those with TTH was present in a small area in SLF. Correction for WMH had negligible impact on the comparisons between those with previous headache and the headache free but rendered the differences in AD between those with persistent headache and the headache free insignificant. The extent of differences in FA, MD, AD and RD between those with new onset headache and the headache free was slightly reduced but still present in all major WM tracts. As in statistical Model 1, there were no differences in any of the DTI indices between migraine and TTH and no correlation between any of the DTI indices and frequency of headache attacks.

Fig. 2
figure 2

WMH-corrected differences in white matter FA, MD, AD and RD in the TBSS analyses. In addition, there was correction for age, sex and multiple comparisons with Threshold Free Cluster Enhancement and Family-Wise Error rate as implemented in Randomise. Significance level was P < 0.05 (two-tailed). To improve visualization, the group differences were “thickened” using the tbss_fill script in FSL. The FSL 1 mm mean FA template was used as background image

Full size image

TBSS analyses corrected for age, sex, HADS score, chronic pain and consumption of alcohol and over-the-counter painkillers (model 3, Additional file 7: Figure S1)

When correcting for age, sex, and the four clinical variables, those suffering from any headache still had higher MD and AD compared to the headache free. The extent of the MD differences was decreased and included CST, IFOF, ILF and SLF in the left hemisphere. The differences in AD were still present in virtually all WM tracts. For migraine, higher AD was present in the same WM tracts as when correcting only for age and sex, and higher MD emerged in an area of the right CST. Those with TTH had higher AD than the headache free in left CST and left SLF. The number of voxels with higher AD in those with previous headache compared to the headache free were markedly reduced, whereas the differences in MD were barely affected. Furthermore, some scattered areas with significantly higher RD in those with previous headache appeared. There were no differences in any of the DTI indices between those with persistent headache and the headache free. The new onset headache group had higher MD, AD and RD compared to the headache free group. The number of voxels that were significantly different between the two groups decreased but was still present in all WM tracts. No significant differences in FA were found. There were no differences in any of the DTI indices between migraine and TTH and no correlation between any of the DTI indices and frequency of headache attacks (as in Model 1 and 2).

TBSS analyses corrected for age, sex, HADS score, chronic pain, consumption of alcohol and over-the-counter painkillers and WMH (model 4, Additional file 8: Figure S2)

Including all covariates in the statistical model made the difference in MD between the any headache group and the headache free group insignificant and markedly reduced the extent of higher AD to mostly include left CST and left SLF. Although considerably reduced, the higher AD in migraineurs compared to the headache free was still present in CC, right IFOF, right ILF and right CST. No differences were found between those with TTH and the headache free. Those with previous headache had higher MD in all areas of the TBSS skeleton and some areas of higher AD and RD in virtually all major WM tracts compared to the headache free. There were no differences in any of the DTI indices between those with persistent headache and the headache free. The new onset headache group had considerably higher MD, AD and RD compared to the headache free group in virtually all major WM tracts. There were no differences in any of the DTI indices between migraine and TTH and no correlation between any of the DTI indices and frequency of headache attacks (as in Model 1, 2 and 3).

Effect sizes in the TBSS analyses

Table 3 shows the mean and peak (absolute numbers) Cohen’s d values of the TBSS analyses (except for the correlation analyses on attack frequency) corrected for age and sex as well as the mean Cohen’s d values of only the significant voxels in each comparison. The mean effect sizes were very small to small (range = 0.07–0.17) and relatively similar across the different comparisons. The peak Cohen’s d values were mostly medium to large (range = 0.12–0.88) with the largest values present in the comparisons between the new onset headache and the headache free groups and in the direct comparison of migraine and TTH. Considering only the voxels that were significant in each comparison, the mean Cohen’s d values were small (range = 0.15–0.29).

Table 3 Mean Cohen’s d values of the TBSS analyses corrected for age and sex. In parenthesis are peak Cohen’s d values and in brackets are mean Cohen’s d values when considering only the significant voxels
Full size table

Tract-average DTI indices

Additional file 6: Table S6 shows the results of the comparisons of WM tract average DTI indices between the headache groups and the headache free group obtained with automated tractography (only significant differences are shown). When correcting for age and sex (Model 1) the results showed that those suffering from headache had higher MD and AD in ILF compared to the headache free. Higher MD and AD were particularly notable in those with TTH or new onset headache. In addition, those with previous headache had higher AD in CST compared to the headache free.

Adding the Fazekas score as a covariate (Model 2) resulted in fewer significant results and had in particular an impact on IFOF when comparing TTH with the headache free. In addition, those with persistent headache had lower RD of the CING compared to the headache free. The difference in FA of the CING between those with persistent headache and the headache free was not affected by correction for WMH.

When age, sex, HADS score, chronic pain and consumption of alcohol and over-the-counter painkillers were included as covariates (Model 3) almost all previous significant results were eliminated. In contrast, those with migraine and previous headache now had lower FA of the CST compared to the headache free.

When all covariates were included in the statistical model (Model 4) only one comparison showed significance, i.e. those with previous headache had lower FA in CST compared to the headache free. As the Cohen’s d values in Additional file 6: Table S6 shows, there were relatively small differences in tract-average DTI indices between the headache groups and the headache free group (mean = 0.25, median = 0.25, std. deviation = 0.10 and range [0.03–0.41]).

Tract volumes

Table 4 summarizes the results of the comparisons of tract volumes between the headache groups and the headache free group obtained with automated tractography (only significant differences are shown). Those with new onset headache had lower volume of the CC and the IFOF than the headache free in all statistical models. Similar, those with TTH had a lower volume of the CC than the headache free in all statistical models. Individuals with previous headache had lower volume of the IFOF compared to the headache free in Model 3 and Model 4. The Cohen’s d values in Table 5 shows that there were relatively small differences in tract volumes between the headache groups and the headache free group (mean = 0.26, median = 0.27, std. deviation = 0.10 and range [0.07–0.39]).

Table 4 Volumes (mean values with standard deviations in parenthesis) of white matter tracts with significant differences between various headache groups obtained via automated tractography. Only significant comparisons are shown
Full size table

Discussion

The present TBSS analyses showed that those suffering from headache had widespread higher WM MD, AD and RD compared to headache free individuals. The largest effects were seen in those with new onset headache, who also had a decrease in WM FA compared to the headache free in some of the statistical models. Interestingly, the WM microstructure of individuals with persistent headache was quite similar to the WM microstructure of the headache free and there were no correlations between frequency of headache attacks and DTI indices. No significant difference in WM microstructure between migraine and TTH was detected. Several analyses with different covariates were performed and the relevance of these will be further discussed.

The higher WM AD in those with TTH and/or persistent headache compared to the headache free could be explained by WMH. For migraine on the other hand, a combination of WMH, HADS score, chronic pain and the consumption of alcohol and over-the-counter painkillers almost completely explained the higher WM AD. In contrast, the differences in WM microstructure between those with previous or new onset headache and the headache free were to a far lesser degree explained by these variables. Correction for WMH had virtually no impact on the WM microstructure of those with previous headache and only slightly decreased the difference in WM microstructure between the new onset headache group and the headache free. Correcting for HADS, chronic pain, alcohol and over-the-counter painkillers made the FA comparison between the new onset headache group and the headache free insignificant, but did not eliminate the significant differences in MD, AD and RD.

It is of interest that the differences in WM microstructure between those with and without headache were widespread and not confined to certain WM tracts. This suggests a widespread process in the white matter leading to altered microstructure. Furthermore, this putative process led to higher diffusivity both parallel (AD) and perpendicular (RD) to the axons. According to the literature, AD is positively associated with axonal integrity and RD negatively associated with myelination [38]. AD and RD (and thus MD) seem to be more sensitive measures of WM microstructure with regard to headache status than FA. Presumably, a high degree of overlap of location of voxels with higher AD and RD led to minimal change in FA.

It is hard to find a pathophysiological plausible explanation for the fact that those with previous or new onset headache had a microstructure of the WM far more different to the headache free’s than those with persistent headache had. The presence of intracranial abnormalities did probably not explain the results as they were uncommon since most participants with intracranial abnormalities were excluded from the DTI analysis, and in the remaining sample the frequency and type of findings were quite similar across the different headache groups. Interestingly, those with previous or new onset headache were more similar to the headache free in terms of demographical and clinical characteristics than those with persistent headache. One might hypothesize that for instance a high consumption of painkillers or a low consumption of alcohol, both of which were present in those with persistent headache, protect the brain from damage caused by headache. Since old ischemic lesions lead to increased MD and decreased FA, and several painkillers share characteristics with antiplatelet drugs used to prevent ischemic events, the usage of painkillers could conceivably affect the microstructure of the white matter [6, 39]. Alcohol has previously been shown to increase MD and decrease FA [40]. However, correction for these variables showed that the present level of alcohol and painkiller consumption could not explain the results.

Primary headaches are usually developed in the teens or early adulthood whereas secondary headaches more often start later in life [41, 42]. Considering that the participants in the present study were aged 50–66 years this may be of importance. Since individuals reporting new onset headache in HUNT3 actually had a middle-age onset headache, one may speculate that some of them suffered from some sort of secondary headache, and furthermore, that the widespread higher WM diffusion in these individuals is reflective of a brain process leading to headache.

The differences in WM microstructure between those with and without headache were not associated with type of headache. Both migraine and TTH had a slightly higher WM AD when compared to the headache free. Furthermore, there was no differences in DTI indices when comparing migraine directly with TTH. However, the lack of an association between WM microstructure and headache type must be viewed in the light of effect sizes and sample sizes. Most of the comparisons involving migraine and TTH actually had larger Cohen’s d values than many of the comparisons with significant findings but included fewer individuals. Hence, despite its size, this study was probably underpowered to detect if type of headache was associated with differences in WM microstructure.

It is not known why some studies report migraineurs to have higher WM diffusion compared to headache free individuals [11,12,13] whereas others report the opposite [14,15,16,17]. One explanation may be differences in basic participant characteristics due to differences in the mode of recruitment. In this regard the present authors believe it is of great importance that this study was based on the general population with no group differences in cardiovascular risk factors or socioeconomic status. Differences in demographical and clinical variables were also corrected for. Furthermore, the present migraine group was larger than the ones in previous studies which further strengthens the confidence in the present results.

The analyses on tract-average DTI indices confirmed the TBSS results of widespread WM microstructural differences between the headache free and those suffering from headache, more precisely TTH and/or new onset headache. The difference in tract-average values were almost completely explained by WMH, HADS, chronic pain and consumption of alcohol and over-the-counter painkillers. Comparisons of the tract volumes showed that, compared to the headache free, those with TTH had lower volume of CC and those with new onset headache had lower volume of CC and IFOF. This could not be explained by any of the covariates. It is important to note that a large number of analyses were performed and that the automated tractography analyses were not corrected for multiple comparisons. Hence, any significant findings should be interpreted with caution.

There are several strengths of the present study. First, compared to previous studies it was large with more power to detect group differences and less vulnerable to random errors. Second, the participants were randomly drawn among individuals attending a large longitudinal epidemiological study (HUNT) minimizing selection bias of clinic-based studies. Third, differences in diffusivity indices were investigated with regard to type of headache, frequency of headache attacks and evolution of headache. Fourth, all scans were performed on the same scanner. Fifth, both TBSS and automated tractography were applied in the analyses of the DTI data. The present study also has some limitations. First, there was a relatively long time interval from the participants answered the headache questionnaire (2006–2008 in HUNT 3) to when they were scanned (2007–2009). Morphological changes of the brain have been reported to both arise and recede within a year, although this has not been shown for DTI [10, 43]. Furthermore, it seems unlikely that the headache had improved dramatically in the majority during the time between the HUNT3 questionnaire and the MRI scanning (mean 1.2 years). Second, headache status was estimated using a questionnaire which is inferior to a clinical interview. However, the headache diagnoses in HUNT3 were validated showing acceptable accuracy [26]. The migraine diagnosis was highly specific but had lower sensitivity whereas this was opposite for the TTH diagnosis. Some true migraineurs were therefore probably incorrectly classified with TTH, which potentially diminished the differences between these groups. The headache categories regarding frequency of attacks and evolution of headache were not validated. Hence, caution must be taken when interpreting these specific analyses. Third, the evolution of the participant’s headache was based on data from only two time points with no information on headache history in between, which further warrants caution regarding these analyses. Fourth, we had no information on use of prophylactic medication. Fifth, we had no information on whether participants were scanned during or between attacks. Sixth, overadjustment may have occurred in some of the statistical models, as for instance headache and chronic pain are associated with each other and may have common causes linking them to WM microstructure.

In light of the present findings, future studies should investigate WM morphology related to the age of headache sufferers and the age of onset of the headache. Furthermore, to ensure sufficient statistical power to detect potential small differences, studies should be based on large samples and samples from the general population should be preferred over samples from clinics to avoid selection bias. Future studies should also not restrict their analyses to FA and MD but also investigate AD and RD.

In conclusion the present study found widespread higher WM diffusion in those suffering from headache compared to headache free individuals in the general population. The largest effects were seen in those with headache developed in middle-age. Overall, the effects were small and there was no dose-response relationship between headache frequency and WM microstructure. WMH, HADS score, chronic pain and consumption of alcohol and over-the-counter painkillers largely explained the findings in those with migraine, TTH or persistent headache, but to a far lesser degree in those with previous or new onset headache.

Availability of data and materials

The present data are the property of HUNT research centre and can only be accessed through direct contact with the research centre.

References

  1. Spector JT, Kahn SR, Jones MR, Jayakumar M, Dalal D, Nazarian S (2010) Migraine headache and ischemic stroke risk: an updated meta-analysis. Am J Med 123(7):612–624

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bashir A, Lipton RB, Ashina S, Ashina M (2013) Migraine and structural changes in the brain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 81:1260–1268

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Honningsvag LM, Haberg AK, Hagen K, Kvistad KA, Stovner LJ, Linde M (2018) White matter hyperintensities and headache: A population-based imaging study (HUNT MRI). Cephalalgia: an international journal of headache 38:333102418764891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Husoy AK, Haberg AK, Rimol LM, Hagen K, Vangberg TR, Stovner LJ (2019) Cerebral cortical dimensions in headache sufferers aged 50–66 years: a population-based imaging study in the Nord-Trondelag health study (HUNT-MRI). Pain 160:1634-1643. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ellerbrock I, Engel AK, May A (2013) Microstructural and network abnormalities in headache. Curr Opin Neurol 26(4):353–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alexander AL, Lee JE, Lazar M, Field AS (2007) Diffusion tensor imaging of the brain. Neurotherapeutics. 4(3):316–329

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Neeb L, Bastian K, Villringer K, Gits HC, Israel H, Reuter U et al (2015) No microstructural white matter alterations in chronic and episodic migraineurs: a case-control diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging study. Headache. 55(2):241–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Petrusic I, Dakovic M, Kacar K, Micic O, Zidverc-Trajkovic J (2018) Migraine with aura and white matter tract changes. Acta Neurol Belg 118:485–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kara B, Kiyat Atamer A, Onat L, Ulusoy L, Mutlu A, Sirvanci M (2013) DTI findings during spontaneous migraine attacks. Clin Neuroradiol 23(1):31–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu J, Lan L, Li G, Yan X, Nan J, Xiong S et al (2013) Migraine-related gray matter and white matter changes at a 1-year follow-up evaluation. J Pain 14(12):1703–1708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Szabo N, Kincses ZT, Pardutz A, Tajti J, Szok D, Tuka B et al (2012) White matter microstructural alterations in migraine: a diffusion-weighted MRI study. Pain. 153(3):651–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chong CD, Schwedt TJ (2015) Migraine affects white-matter tract integrity: a diffusion-tensor imaging study. Cephalalgia 35:1162–1171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rocca MA, Pagani E, Colombo B, Tortorella P, Falini A, Comi G et al (2008) Selective diffusion changes of the visual pathways in patients with migraine: a 3-T tractography study. Cephalalgia 28(10):1061–1068

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Messina R, Rocca MA, Colombo B, Pagani E, Falini A, Comi G et al (2015) White matter microstructure abnormalities in pediatric migraine patients. Cephalalgia 35:1278–1286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Szabo N, Farago P, Kiraly A, Vereb D, Csete G, Toth E et al (2017) Evidence for plastic processes in migraine with Aura: a diffusion weighted MRI study. Front Neuroanat 11:138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu D, Yuan K, Qin W, Zhao L, Dong M, Liu P et al (2013) Axonal loss of white matter in migraine without aura: a tract-based spatial statistics study. Cephalalgia 33(1):34–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu D, Yuan K, Zhao L, Dong M, Liu P, Yang X et al (2013) White matter integrity affected by depressive symptoms in migraine without aura: a tract-based spatial statistics study. NMR Biomed 26(9):1103–1112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Granziera C, DaSilva AF, Snyder J, Tuch DS, Hadjikhani N (2006) Anatomical alterations of the visual motion processing network in migraine with and without aura. PLoS Med 3(10):e402

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. DaSilva AF, Granziera C, Tuch DS, Snyder J, Vincent M, Hadjikhani N (2007) Interictal alterations of the trigeminal somatosensory pathway and periaqueductal gray matter in migraine. Neuroreport. 18(4):301–305

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Yuan K, Qin W, Liu P, Zhao L, Yu D, Zhao L et al (2012) Reduced fractional anisotropy of corpus callosum modulates inter-hemispheric resting state functional connectivity in migraine patients without aura. PLoS One 7(9):e45476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Biau DJ, Kerneis S, Porcher R (2008) Statistics in brief: the importance of sample size in the planning and interpretation of medical research. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(9):2282–2288

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chou KH, Yang FC, Fuh JL, Huang CC, Lirng JF, Lin YY et al (2014) Altered white matter microstructural connectivity in cluster headaches: a longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging study. Cephalalgia 34(13):1040–1052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Teepker M, Menzler K, Belke M, Heverhagen JT, Voelker M, Mylius V et al (2012) Diffusion tensor imaging in episodic cluster headache. Headache. 52(2):274–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Elshafey R, Hassanien O, Khalil M (2014) Diffusion tensor imaging for characterizing white matter changes in multiple sclerosis. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 45(3):881–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Honningsvag LM, Linde M, Haberg A, Stovner LJ, Hagen K (2012) Does health differ between participants and non-participants in the MRI-HUNT study, a population based neuroimaging study? The Nord-Trondelag health studies 1984-2009. BMC Med Imaging 12:23

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hagen K, Zwart JA, Aamodt AH, Nilsen KB, Brathen G, Helde G et al (2010) The validity of questionnaire-based diagnoses: the third Nord-Trondelag health study 2006-2008. J Headache Pain 11(1):67–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hansen TI, Brezova V, Eikenes L, Håberg AK, Vangberg TR (2015) How does the accuracy of intracranial volume measurements affect normalized brain volumes? Sample size estimates based on 966 subjects from the HUNT MRI cohort. AJNR Am j neuroradiol 36:1450–1456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Visser E, Nijhuis EH, Buitelaar JK, Zwiers MP (2011) Partition-based mass clustering of tractography streamlines. Neuroimage 54(1):303–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Rueckert D, Nichols TE, Mackay CE et al (2006) Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage. 31(4):1487–1505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H et al (2004) Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23(Suppl 1):S208–S219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Andersson JLR, Jenkinson M, Smith S (2007) Non-Linear optimisation. FMRIB technical report TR07JA1 from https://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/datasets/techrep/tr07ja1/tr07ja1.pdf.

  32. Andersson JLR, Jenkinson M, Smith S (2007) Non-linear registration, aka Spatial normalisation FMRIB technical report TR07JA2 from https://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/datasets/techrep/tr07ja2/tr07ja2.pdf.

  33. Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, Hayes C, Hill DL, Leach MO, Hawkes DJ (1999) Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18(8):712–721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Haberg AK, Olsen A, Moen KG, Schirmer-Mikalsen K, Visser E, Finnanger TG et al (2015) White matter microstructure in chronic moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: impact of acute-phase injury-related variables and associations with outcome measures. J Neurosci Res 93(7):1109–1126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tuch DS (2004) Q-ball imaging. Magn Reson Med 52(6):1358–1372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Winkler AM, Ridgway GR, Webster MA, Smith SM, Nichols TE (2014) Permutation inference for the general linear model. Neuroimage. 92:381–397

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Haberg AK, Hammer TA, Kvistad KA, Rydland J, Muller TB, Eikenes L et al (2016) Incidental intracranial findings and their clinical impact; the HUNT MRI study in a general population of 1006 participants between 50-66 years. PLoS One 11(3):e0151080

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Song SK, Sun SW, Ramsbottom MJ, Chang C, Russell J, Cross AH (2002) Dysmyelination revealed through MRI as increased radial (but unchanged axial) diffusion of water. Neuroimage. 17(3):1429–1436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schafer AI (1995) Effects of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs on platelet function and systemic hemostasis. J Clin Pharmacol 35(3):209–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zahr NM, Pfefferbaum A (2017) Alcohol's Effects on the Brain: Neuroimaging Results in Humans and Animal Models. Alcohol research 38(2):183–206

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jensen R, Stovner LJ (2008) Epidemiology and comorbidity of headache. Lancet Neurol 7(4):354–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bamford CC, Mays M, Tepper SJ (2011) Unusual headaches in the elderly. Curr Pain Headache Rep 15(4):295–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Teutsch S, Herken W, Bingel U, Schoell E, May A (2008) Changes in brain gray matter due to repetitive painful stimulation. Neuroimage. 42(2):845–849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (The HUNT Study) is a collaboration between HUNT Research Centre (Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)), Nord-Trøndelag County Council, Central Norway Regional Health Authority, and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. HUNT-MRI was funded by the Liaison Committee between the Central Norway Regional Health Authority and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, and the Norwegian National Advisory Unit for functional MRI.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Norwegian Data Inspectorate, the Norwegian Board of Health, and the Regional Committee for ethics in Medical Research. All participants gave their informed, written consent.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NTNU – Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway

    Andreas Kattem Husøy, Live Eikenes, Asta K. Håberg, Knut Hagen & Lars Jacob Stovner

  2. Norwegian Advisory Unit on Headaches, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway

    Knut Hagen & Lars Jacob Stovner

  3. Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, NTNU – Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway

    Live Eikenes & Asta K. Håberg

Authors
  1. Andreas Kattem Husøy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Live Eikenes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Asta K. Håberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Knut Hagen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lars Jacob Stovner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AKH: Analysis and interpretation of data and writing of manuscript. LE: Analyses and interpretation of data and critical revision of manuscript. AKHå: Interpretation of data and critical revision of manuscript. KH: Critical revision of manuscript and LJS: Interpretation of data and critical revision of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Kattem Husøy.

Ethics declarations

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Scan parameters for the T1, T2 and FLAIR sequences. (DOCX 13 kb)

Additional file 2:

Table S2. Intracranial abnormalities related to headache status. (DOCX 14 kb)

Additional file 3:

Table S3. Rare intracranial abnormalities related to headache status. (DOCX 13 kb)

Additional file 4:

Table S4. Number of individuals in each Fazeka’s grade in the different headache categories. (DOCX 15 kb)

Additional file 5:

Table S5. Frequency of headache attacks in HUNT3 in the different headache categories. (DOCX 14 kb)

Additional file 6:

Table S6. Diffusivity indices (mean values with standard deviations in parenthesis) of white matter tracts with significant differences between various headache groups obtained via automated tractography. Only significant comparisons are shown. (DOCX 16 kb)

Additional file 7:

Figure S1. Differences in white matter FA, MD, AD and RD in the TBSS analyses corrected for age, sex, HADS, chronic pain and consumption of alcohol and over-the-counter painkillers. Significance level was P < 0.05 (two-tailed) and corrected for multiple comparisons with Threshold Free Cluster Enhancement and Family-Wise Error rate as implemented in Randomise. To improve visualization, the group differences were “thickened” using the tbss_fill script in FSL. The FSL 1 mm mean FA template was used as background image. (PNG 2254 kb)

Additional file 8:

Figure S2. Differences in white matter FA, MD, AD and RD in the TBSS analyses corrected for age, sex, WMH, HADS, chronic pain and consumption of alcohol and over-the-counter painkillers. Significance level was P < 0.05 (two-tailed) and corrected for multiple comparisons with Threshold Free Cluster Enhancement and Family-Wise Error rate as implemented in Randomise. To improve visualization, the group differences were “thickened” using the tbss_fill script in FSL. The FSL 1 mm mean FA template was used as background image. (PNG 1722 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kattem Husøy, A., Eikenes, L., Håberg, A.K. et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in middle-aged headache sufferers in the general population: a cross-sectional population-based imaging study in the Nord-Trøndelag health study (HUNT-MRI). J Headache Pain 20, 78 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-1028-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-1028-6

The Journal of Headache and Pain

ISSN: 1129-2377

Contact us