Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Characterization of the trigeminovascular actions of several adenosine A2A receptor antagonists in an in vivo rat model of migraine

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 3 and
  • 1Email author
Contributed equally
The Journal of Headache and PainOfficial Journal of the "European Headache Federation" and of "Lifting The Burden - The Global Campaign against Headache"201819:41

https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0867-x

  • Received: 20 February 2018
  • Accepted: 11 May 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Migraine is considered a neurovascular disorder, but its pathophysiological mechanisms are not yet fully understood. Adenosine has been shown to increase in plasma during migraine attacks and to induce vasodilation in several blood vessels; however, it remains unknown whether adenosine can interact with the trigeminovascular system. Moreover, caffeine, a non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist, is included in many over the counter anti-headache/migraine treatments.

Methods

This study used the rat closed cranial window method to investigate in vivo the effects of the adenosine A2A receptor antagonists with varying selectivity over A1 receptors; JNJ-39928122, JNJ-40529749, JNJ-41942914, JNJ-40064440 or JNJ-41501798 (0.3–10 mg/kg) on the vasodilation of the middle meningeal artery produced by either CGS21680 (an adenosine A2A receptor agonist) or endogenous CGRP (released by periarterial electrical stimulation).

Results

Regarding the dural meningeal vasodilation produced neurogenically or pharmacologically, all JNJ antagonists: (i) did not affect neurogenic vasodilation but (ii) blocked the vasodilation produced by CGS21680, with a blocking potency directly related to their additional affinity for the adenosine A1 receptor.

Conclusions

These results suggest that vascular adenosine A2A (and, to a certain extent, also A1) receptors mediate the CGS21680-induced meningeal vasodilation. These receptors do not appear to modulate prejunctionally the sensory release of CGRP. Prevention of meningeal arterial dilation might be predictive for anti-migraine drugs, and since none of these JNJ antagonists modified per se blood pressure, selective A2A receptor antagonism may offer a novel approach to antimigraine therapy which remains to be investigated in clinical trials.

Keywords

  • Adenosine receptor
  • CGS21680
  • Dural vasodilation
  • Rat, vasodepressor response

Background

Migraine is a neurovascular disorder associated with activation of the trigeminovascular system and release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) from trigeminal sensory perivascular nerves, which results in cranial vasodilation and stimulation of sensory nerve transmission [1]. In line with these neurovascular mechanisms: (i) plasma levels of CGRP, which increase during migraine, are normalized by triptans in parallel with amelioration of headache [2]; and (ii) CGRP receptor antagonists [1] and antibodies against CGRP or its receptor [3] are effective in migraine treatment. Although there seem to be some full-responders, the average reduction in migraine days compared to placebo is only in the excess of 1 day per month when administering any CGRP antibody [4]. This limited efficacy resulting from inhibiting CGRP effects suggests that the pathogenesis of migraine could involve additional mechanisms.

Interestingly, adenosine (released centrally and peripherally as a breakdown product of ATP) is another neuromodulator that seems to play a role in migraine pathophysiology [5]. Indeed: (i) adenosine plasma levels have been reported to be increased during migraine attacks [6]; (ii) exogenous adenosine may trigger migraine attacks [7]; (iii) dipyridamole, an adenosine uptake inhibitor, may increase the frequency of migraine attacks [8]; and (iv) an adenosine gene haplotype has been associated with migraine with aura [9]. Accordingly, adenosine receptor antagonists may have potential therapeutic usefulness in the treatment of migraine; while caffeine, a non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist [5], is already present in several over-the-counter anti-headache/migraine medications [10].

The conjunction of structural, transductional and operational criteria has shown that adenosine can activate four subtypes of G-protein-coupled receptors [11, 12], namely adenosine: (i) A1 and A3 receptors (coupled to Gi proteins), which mediate vascular smooth muscle constriction; and (ii) A2A and A2B receptors (coupled to Gs proteins), which mediate direct and endothelium-dependent vasodilation [13, 14]. Moreover, the A1 receptor can also mediate endothelium-dependent vasodilation [15, 16].

Within this framework, it has been shown ex vivo that adenosine and CGS21680, a stable A2A receptor agonist (with about 10–100-fold selectivity for A2A receptors over A1 and A3 receptors and poor affinity for A2B receptors [17]), dilate middle meningeal and cerebral arteries respectively, a response blocked by A2A receptor antagonists [13, 18].

The above findings, coupled to the demonstration that the trigeminal ganglion expresses A2A receptors [19] and the ability of this receptor to facilitate CGRP release in the hippocampus [20], beg the questions of whether adenosine A2A receptors can induce meningeal vasodilation in vivo, and also whether they could be involved in neurogenic vasodilation either per se or as modulators of CGRP release in the trigeminovascular system.

Hence, this study used the rat closed cranial window method, a model predictive of antimigraine action [21], to investigate the effects of five novel adenosine A2A receptor antagonists (Fig. 1) on the vasodilation of the middle meningeal artery produced by either CGS21680 or endogenous CGRP (released by periarterial electrical stimulation). These antagonists (JNJ-41942914, JNJ-39928122, JNJ-40529749, JNJ-40064440 and JNJ-41501798) were developed as described by Shook et al. [22] and display a varying degree of selectivity for A2A over A1 receptors (Table 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Molecular structures of the JNJ antagonists from Janssen Research & Development

Table 1

Affinity constants indicated as IC50 in nM (and the corresponding pIC50) for the compounds used in the present study

Compound

A2A

A1

Fold selectivity

   

Selectivity A2A vs. A1

CGS2168033

22 nM (7.6)

3100 nM (5.5)

141

Caffeine28

8100 nM (5.1)

20,000 nM (4.7)

2.5

JNJ-39928122a

7.9 nM λ (8.1)

55.1 nM λ (7.3)

7

JNJ-40529749a

4.9 nM (8.3)

89.1 nM (7.1)

18

JNJ-41942914a

8.3 nM (8.1)

1093 nM (6.0)

132

JNJ-40064440a

8.2 nM (8.1)

1240 nM (5.9)

151

JNJ-41501798a

11.5 nM (7.9)

7997 nM (5.1)

695

The JNJ antagonists were developed by Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C

Hutchison et al. 1989 [33]; Fredholm et al. 1999 [28]; a, Paul Jackson (Janssen Research & Development, personal communication); λ, Indicates Ki values

Methods

Intravital microscopy experiments

Animals

Fifty seven normotensive male Sprague-Dawley rats (300–400 g), purchased from Harlan (Horst, The Netherlands), were maintained at a 12/12-h light-dark cycle (with light beginning at 7 a.m.) and housed at a constant temperature (22 ± 2°C) and humidity (50%), with food and water ad libitum. Only male rats were used to avoid crosstalk between CGRP and hormonal fluctuations during the female oestrus cycle [23]. The animals were anaesthetized with an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of sodium pentobarbital (60 mg/kg, followed by 18 mg/kg i.v. per hour when necessary). The adequacy of anaesthesia was judged by a negative tail flick test and the absence of ocular reflexes, amongst others. All experimental protocols of this study were approved by our Institutional Ethics Committee [Erasmus MC; permission protocol number EMC 1931 (118–09-04)], in accordance with the NIH guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals in U.S.A. and the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting experiments in animals [24]. All rats were randomly assigned into the different experimental protocols (see experimental protocol section).

General methods

After anesthesia, the trachea was cannulated and connected to a pressure ventilator (small animal ventilator SAR-830 series, CWE Inc., Ardmore, PA, U.S.A.). End-tidal pCO2 was monitored (Capstar-100 CWE Inc., PA, U.S.A.) and kept between 35 and 48 mmHg. The left femoral vein and artery were cannulated for intravenous (i.v.) administration of drugs and continuous monitoring of blood pressure, respectively. Two or three samples of blood (at the beginning and at the end of the experiment) were withdrawn via the femoral artery to monitor blood gases and other parameters, which were kept between normal values (pH: 7.35–7.48; pCO2: 35–48 mmHg; pO2: 100–120 mmHg). The body temperature of each rat was monitored via a rectal thermometer and maintained throughout the experiment (36.5 °C–37.5 °C) by a homeothermic blanket system for rodents (Harvard Instruments, Edenbridge, Kent, U.K.). The rats were placed in a stereotaxic frame and the parietal bone overlying a segment of the dural meningeal artery was carefully drilled thin, applying cold saline (4 °C) until the artery was visible. Since skull drilling induces vasodilation, we allowed the animal to recover for 1 h before the experimental protocol. The drilled area was covered with mineral oil to prevent drying and to facilitate visualization of the meningeal artery. The artery was captured with an intravital microscope (model MZ 16; Leica microsystem Ltd., Heerbrugg, Switzerland) using a cyan blue filter on a cold source of light. A zoom lens (80–450 × magnification) and a camera was used to display images with the blood vessel diameter (30–40 μm at baseline) being continuously monitored and measured with a video dimension analyser (Living Systems Instrumentation Inc., Burlington, VT, U.S.A.). In rats where periarterial electrical stimulation was used to evoke dural vasodilation, a bipolar stimulating electrode (NE 200X, Clark Electromedical, Edenbridge, Kent, U.K.) was placed on the surface of the cranial window approximately within 200 μm from the vessel of interest. The cranial window surface was stimulated at 5 Hz, 1 ms for 10 s (Stimulator model S88, Grass Instruments, West Warwick, RI, U.S.A.). For neurogenic dural vasodilation, we initially started with a current intensity (monitored on an oscilloscope, model 54601A, Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA, U.S.A.) of 100 μA and increased with 50 μA steps until a maximal level of dilatation was achieved, usually at 200 μA. The resulting data were displayed and recorded using a WINDAQ data acquisition system (Version 2.54; DataQ Instruments Inc., Akron, OH, U.S.A.).

Experimental protocols

First, 6 animals were used to determine the effect of i.v. adenosine and caffeine on the middle meningeal artery diameter. The doses of adenosine (1 mg/kg) and caffeine (40 mg/kg) were based on previously published work [15, 25]. Further, 51 animals were divided into two groups which received, respectively, periarterial electrical stimulation (150–250 μA; n = 27) and the adenosine A2 receptor agonist CGS21680 (10 μg/kg, i.v., n = 24; the optimal dose as determined in 7 pilot experiments, data not shown). Dural vasodilator responses remained unchanged after repeated treatment for 4 times (data not shown) and in the presence of the vehicle captisol, which was used for dissolving most of the antagonists. Thirty min were allowed between each of these treatments for recovery to the baseline diameter. Subsequently, each of these groups was subdivided into five subgroups (n = 3–6 each) which were given (after 30 min) i.v. bolus injections of, respectively, the adenosine A2A receptor antagonists JNJ-41942914 (0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg), JNJ-39928122, JNJ-40529749, JNJ-40064440 and JNJ-41501798 (all 1, 3 and up to 10 mg/kg). Based on their binding affinities (see Table 1), only doses up until significant blockade, were tested for the CGS21580 response. Each antagonist dose was administered 5 min before periarterial electrical stimulation or CGS21680, except for caffeine (15 min) as previously reported [25]. The duration of each experiment was approximately 2.5 h after stabilization.

Data presentation and statistical evaluation

All data are presented as mean ± SEM. The peak increases in dural meningeal artery diameter are expressed as percent change from baseline. Changes in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were expressed as absolute values (mm Hg). The difference between the variables within one group was compared by using a one-way repeated measures analysis of variance followed by Dunnet’s test. Dunnet’s test does not give individual P-values, hence statistical significance was accepted at P < 0.05. When there was only one dose applied (for caffeine), two-tailed paired Student’s T-test was used.

Drugs

The compounds used in this study were: sodium pentobarbital (Nembutal; Ceva Sante Animale B.V., Maassluis, The Netherlands); caffeine, adenosine and CGS21680 hydrochloride hydrate (2-p-(2-Carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5′-N-ethylcarboxamido adenosine hydrochloride hydrate) (Sigma Chemicals Co., Steinheim, Germany); JNJ-41942914, JNJ-39928122, JNJ-40064440, JNJ-40529749 and JNJ-41501798 (gift courtesy from Janssen Research & Development, L.L.C., Raritan, NJ, U.S.A.). Caffeine, adenosine, CGS21680 and JNJ-40064440 were dissolved in distilled water, whereas JNJ-39928122, JNJ-41942914, JNJ-40529749 and JNJ-41501798 were dissolved in captisol (sulfobutylether β-cyclodextrin; Ligand Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, U.S.A.). The suspensions of JNJ-40529749 and JNJ-41501798 were sonicated and filtrated. All solutions were further diluted in saline.

Results

General considerations

In order to facilitate the interpretation of the following results, the five JNJ antagonists (Table 1) were sub-divided, a priori, into 3 groups (indicated in different grey-tones): (i) JNJ-39928122 and JNJ-40529749 have ~ 10 fold selectivity for A2A over A1 receptors; (ii) JNJ-41942914 and JNJ-40064440 are ~ 100 fold selective for A2A over A1 receptors; and (iii) JNJ-41501798 is ~ 700 fold selective for A2A over A1 receptors. It is also worth mentioning that caffeine has ~ 2.5 fold selectivity for the rat and ~ 5 fold selectivity for the human A2A vs. A1 receptors [KD values, [26]]; however, caffeine also inhibits A2B receptor with similar affinity as for A1, which is not the case for the JNJ antagonists.

Effects of i.v. adenosine and caffeine on dural diameter and MAP

We initially set out to determine the effect of adenosine on the dural diameter in vivo. Figure 2 shows that (i) 1 mg/kg adenosine caused a dural artery dilation of 50 ± 6% and a drop in blood pressure to 53 ± 4 mmHg; (ii) 40 mg/kg caffeine caused a non-significant dural artery dilation of 12 ± 5%, while blood pressure was increased significantly by 14 ± 3 mmHg; (iii) after a stabilizing period post-caffeine, the second dural artery dilation produced by adenosine was reduced to 25 ± 6% (n = 6, p = 0.003, which was accompanied by a significantly attenuated drop in blood pressure, to 69 ± 5 mmHg (p = 0.004).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

The effect of caffeine on adenosine-induced dural vasodilation. Adenosine (1 mg/kg) was injected i.v. after a recovery period of 30 min. Then, caffeine (40 mg/kg) was injected slowly, and a second adenosine injection (1 mg/kg) was injected 15 min after the caffeine injection (adenosine after caffeine). Left panel illustrates increase in diameter and right panel changes in mean arterial blood pressure, in response to adenosine. Data are ± SEM, n = 6, ** p < 0.01 compared to the control. Open circles represent baseline measurements before injections, B=Baseline

Effect of the JNJ antagonists on the dural dilatation by periarterial electrical stimulation

In order to investigate whether the dural dilation induced by periarterial electrical stimulation could be in part dependent on adenosine release, either as direct activation of vascular adenosine receptors or prejunctional modulation of trigeminal CGRP release, the JNJ antagonists (given i.v.) were investigated in their capability to modify the dural vasodilation produced by electrical stimulation. As shown in Fig. 3 (left panels), neurogenic stimulation induced, overall, an immediate increase in dural artery diameter of 83 ± 7% (n = 27). Surprisingly, none of the JNJ antagonists affected this neurogenic vasodilation (left panels). Suggesting that neither A1 nor A2A receptors are involved.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Effect of A2A antagonists on perivascular electrical stimulation of the dural artery. Perivascular electrical stimulation (150–250 μA) in the absence or presence of vehicle, or varying doses of JNJ-39928122 (A, n = 4), JNJ-40529749 (B, n = 4–5), JNJ-41942914 (C, n = 6), JNJ-40064440 (D, n = 4), or JNJ-41501798 (E, n = 7–8). Data are presented as percentage of increase in diameter, left panels) and changes in mean arterial blood pressure (mm Hg, right panels) induced by periarterial electrical stimulation (ES). Note that none of the treatments produced any significant changes (p > 0.05 compared to the vehicle). Open circles represent baseline measurements before injections/ES. JNJ-40064440 was dissolved in water, so vehicle measurements equal control

The effect of the JNJ antagonists on MAP before and during neurogenic dural stimulation

As shown in Fig. 3 (right panels), both periarterial electrical stimulation and the JNJ antagonists were devoid of any effect per se on MAP.

Effects of CGS21680 on dural artery diameter and MAP

Although adenosine A2A or A1 receptors did not appear to be important in the vasodilation observed after neurogenic dural stimulation, adenosine vasodilates dural arteries in vivo (Fig. 2), most likely via both A2A and A2B receptors as previously reported ex vivo [13]. Since our study set out to study specifically the role of the adenosine A2A receptor, we continued our study using CGS21680, which is a more biologically stable, highly selective for A2A over A2B receptor agonist [17].

As shown in Fig. 4, CGS21680 (10 μg/kg before administration of JNJ antagonists; n = 24) mimicked adenosine in its capability to produce: (i) a marked dilation of the dural artery diameter (66 ± 9%; left panels); and (ii) a drop in blood pressure (53 ± 9 mmHg; right panels) and hence excluding the involvement of A2B receptors.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Effect of i.v. CGS21680 on the dural diameter. CGS21680 (10 μg/kg) was injected followed by an injection of vehicle and varying doses of JNJ-39928122 (a), n = 5, Dunnet critical value: 1014), JNJ-40529749 (b), n = 3–5, Dunnet critical value: 3791) JNJ-41942914 (c), n = 4, Dunnet critical value: 6008), JNJ-40064440 (d), n = 3–4, Dunnet critical value: 8446), or JNJ-41501798 (e), n = 5–6, Dunnet critical value: 5848). Data are presented as percentage of increase in diameter (left panels) and changes in mean arterial blood pressure (mm Hg, right panels) induced by CGS21680 (left lower panels). CGS, 10 μg/kg CGS21680 i.v.; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 compared to the vehicle. #CGS in presence of vehicle. Open circles represent baseline measurements before injections. JNJ-40064440 was dissolved in water, so vehicle measurements equal control

The lower the selectivity (A2A over A1 receptors) the higher the potency of JNJ antagonists to block CGS21680-induced dural vasodilation

To further uncover the nature of the adenosine receptors in the dural vasculature, we explored the effect of the JNJ antagonist with varying selectivity (A2A over A1 receptors). Figure 4 (left panels) also shows that all JNJ antagonists significantly blocked the CGS21680-induced dural vasodilation with varying degrees of potency. Specifically, the vasodilation to CGS21680 was: (i) abolished by 1 mg/kg (− 1 ± 2%) of JNJ-39928122 (Fig. 4a); (ii) abolished at 1 mg/kg (− 2 ± 1%) of JNJ-40529749 (Fig. 4b); (iii) significantly attenuated (but not abolished) by 3 mg/kg (21 ± 11%) of JNJ-41942914 (Fig. 4c); (iv) significantly attenuated by 3 mg/kg (23 ± 15%) and abolished (1 ± 3%) by 10 mg/kg of JNJ-40064440 (Fig. 4d); and (v) dose-dependently blocked, and practically abolished by 10 mg/kg (5 ± 4%) of JNJ-41501798 (Fig. 4e). Clearly, the lower the selectivity of A2A vs. A1 (Table 1) the higher the potency of JNJ antagonists to block CGS21680-induced dural vasodilation.

Effect of JNJ antagonists on CGS21680-induced vasodepressor responses

Similarly, the vasodepressor responses to CGS21680 were blocked by the JNJ antagonists as follows: (i) very potently by the less selective antagonists JNJ-39928122 and JNJ-40529749; and (ii) less potently by the highest doses of the more selective antagonists JNJ-41942914, JNJ-40064440 and JNJ-41501798, which display from low to very low affinity for the A1 receptor (Table 1).

Discussion

Comparison between in vivo and in vitro vascular responses to adenosine

The adenosine receptor antagonists SCH58261 (478-fold A2A over A1 selective [27]) and caffeine (non-selective A1/2A/2B [28]) have been shown to block the ex vivo adenosine-induced dilation of endothelium-denuded middle meningeal arteries [18]. In these experiments, not only did caffeine (50 μM) or SCH58261 (1 μM) prevent the dural dilation, but a vasoconstriction to adenosine was unmasked. Interestingly, this effect was not observed in vivo, which could be due to the fact that the artery used for the myograph (outer diameter ~ 100 μm) had a larger diameter than in this study (outer diameter ~ 35 μm) and that there potentially are less A3 receptors expressed in smaller vessels, as we see no indirect involvement of A3 (i.e. vasoconstriction) in the current experiments. These differences require further investigation, but it is known that receptor expression changes along different vascular beds [29].

General considerations

In addition to the implications discussed below, the present study shows that: (i) both adenosine and CGS21680 produced rat dural vasodilation in vivo; and (ii) for JNJ antagonists, the lower the selectivity (A2A over A1 receptors) the higher the potency to block the dural vasodilation and vasodepressor responses induced by CGS21680 (implying that blockade of A1 receptors is also necessary to completely block the dural vasodilation in vivo). The latter finding is most likely due to endothelial A1 receptors, as the main difference between the in vivo (present study) and the ex vivo studies [18] is the absence of endothelium. Indeed, Honey et al. [21] have shown the presence of adenosine A1 receptors mediating vasodilation in the rat middle meningeal artery in vivo.

The potential role of A2A and A1 receptors in the dural vasodilation as prejunctional modulators of neurogenic dural vasodilation or produced by CGS21680

The simplest interpretation of the fact that the JNJ antagonists had no effect on neurogenic dural vasodilation (Fig. 3), which involves CGRP release [1], implies that: (i) adenosine is not released by periarterial electrical stimulation; (ii) A2A receptors do not constitute a positive feedback mechanism for CGRP release, as expected from its transductional properties (positive coupling to Gs proteins; [11]); or (iii) cAMP increase, induced by CGRP, is so high that this could have masked the small increase in cAMP levels mediated by A2A receptors [26]. Interestingly, adenosine A1 receptors [coupled to Gi proteins; [11]] can produce a prejunctional inhibition of the neurogenic dural vasodilation in rats [21]. However, the weakly selective JNJ antagonists (JNJ-39928122 and JNJ-40529749), which would be theoretically expected to block (at least in part) this mechanism, did not increase neurogenic dural vasodilation (Fig. 3).

Several lines of evidence have previously shown in other systems that: (i) the vasodilation produced by adenosine and related agonists is mainly mediated by vascular and endothelial A2A receptors [13, 14] as well as by endothelial A1 receptors [16]; and (ii) the trigeminovascular system expresses A2A receptors [19]. In keeping with these findings, our results further demonstrate that the JNJ antagonists blocked CGS21680-induced dural vasodilation (Fig. 4), with a different profile of blockade (dependent on A2A vs. A1 selectivity; see below). This reinforces the involvement of adenosine A2A and, probably to a lesser extent, of A1 receptors. In addition, based on the poor affinity of CGS21680 for the A2B receptors [17] and similar responses to adenosine, our data did not show any strong involvement of the A2B receptors.

Systemic effects of JNJ antagonists on A2A and A1 receptors

Caffeine is a non-selective adenosine A1, A2A and A2B receptor antagonist that does not affect A3 receptors at the doses used [28]. Accordingly, caffeine produced a slight increase in blood pressure (Fig. 2), as previously reported [25]. Interestingly, the fact that none of the JNJ antagonists increased blood pressure (Fig. 4, right panel), even at doses that blocked the dural vasodilation to CGS21680 (Fig. 4, left panel) suggests that there is no strong “adenosine vascular tone”. In addition, it is worth emphasizing that A2B receptors are involved in the blood pressure effects of adenosine [30], which would explain the minor difference between caffeine and the JNJ antagonists in our study.

It is well established that A2A receptor agonists lower blood pressure [12, 31]. The A1 receptor agonists GR79236 and N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), although less studied, also decrease blood pressure with higher potency than CGS21680, and both cause direct production of endothelial NO [15, 16, 31]. Hence, the vasodepressor response to adenosine in A1 −/− mice is reduced [32]. In the present study, the less selective (JNJ-39928122 and JNJ-40529749) A2A vs. A1 antagonists potently blocked the decrease in blood pressure, whereas the more selective (JNJ-40064440 and JNJ-41501798) A2A antagonists were less potent, and only effective at 10 mg/kg. These high doses of JNJ-4006440 and JNJ-41501798 also induced inihibition of A1 receptors. Blockade of the adenosine A2A and A1 receptors prevents systemic vasodilation in response to adenosine, and therefore the block in blood pressure.

In vivo effects of CGS21680

In binding affinity studies, CGS21680 is 141-fold selective for A2A over A1 receptors [33]. However, our study raises the concern whether CGS21680 is a specific A2A receptor agonist in vivo in rats, as it appears that higher blocking affinities for the A1 receptor causes a more potent blockade of the vasodepressor and dural vasodilator responses. For the human adenosine receptors, the selectivity for A2A over A1 receptors is minimal [34].

The most obvious explanation for the apparent discrepancy between the binding affinity selectively and the in vivo effects, is the location of adenosine receptors, as A1 receptors are on the endothelium, whereas the A2A receptors are mainly located on vascular smooth muscle [12]; hence the endothelium will be directly exposed to an apparently higher concentration. In addition, there are opposing findings on the selectivity of CGS21680. For example CGS21680 binds with high affinity (around 1 nM) to A1 receptors in the hippocampus of A2A−/− mice [35], in contrast, in the same mice CGS21680 had no effect on blood pressure [36].

Comparing our findings with previous studies in rats, the vasodepressor response to CGS21680 (10 μg/kg) was completely blocked by 3 mg/kg of the A2A receptor antagonists ZM241385 [319-fold A2A over A1; [15, 27]] or CGS15943 [9-fold A2A over A1; [37]]. Clearly, ZM241385 has a higher A2A over A1 selectivity, but its Ki for A1 receptors is 255 nM. Since these binding data are similar to those of our less selective compounds, A2A and also A1 receptors would be blocked in these studies.

Possible clinical implications

On the basis of the above lines of evidence, the antimigraine potential of selective adenosine A2A receptor antagonists would be of particular relevance in those patients whose adenosine plasma levels are markedly increased during a migraine attack. Although our findings indicate that adenosine is not released by perivascular electrical stimulation, inhibition of dural vasodilation is a shared mechanism of current (ergots and triptans) and prospective (CGRP (receptor) antagonists and antibodies) antimigraine drugs [1, 38]. Whether this (antimigraine) mechanism alone is sufficient to attenuate the trigeminal nociceptive transmission associated with migraine headache, remains to be determined. Additionally, other studies have shown that: (i) activation of A2A receptors facilitates the action of CGRP and VIP in the rat hippocampus [20]; (ii) A2A receptor knockout mice are hypoalgesic [36]; and (iii) A2A receptors are expressed in the rat trigeminovascular system [19] as well as in the rat trigeminal ganglion, together with A1, A2B and A3 receptors [18]. Furthermore, intra-articular administration of adenosine and N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA, an adenosine A1 receptor agonist), but not CGS21680, significantly increased ketorolac antinociception [39]. These findings, taken together: (i) argue in favor of selective blockade of adenosine A2 receptors as a potential antimigraine strategy; and (ii) imply that blockade of A1 receptors would be a disadvantage in antimigraine treatment. Obviously, further clinical studies should evaluate the JNJ antagonist(s) with the optimal oral bioavailability based on their pharmacokinetic properties.

Conclusions

In conclusion, all the JNJ antagonists were capable of blocking CGS21680-induced dural vasodilation without affecting neurogenic dural vasodilation (suggesting no modulation of trigeminal CGRP release). This blockade was more potent when showing lower A2A over A1 selectivity, and that both these receptors are involved in the dural artery vasodilation. On this basis, and considering that the JNJ antagonist were devoid of any effect per se on blood pressure, selective A2A receptor antagonism may offer a novel approach to antimigraine therapy that remains to be determined in clinical trials.

Notes

Abbreviations

CGRP : 

Calcitonin gene-related peptide

i.p. : 

Intraperitoneal

i.v. : 

Intravenous

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Dr. Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink was supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (Vidi grant 917.113.349), whereas Prof. Carlos M. Villalón and Alejandro Labastida-Ramírez were supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT; Grant No. 219707 to CMV and fellowship No. 410778 to ALR; Mexico City). Dr. Kristian A. Haanes was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the International Headache Society.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from Janssen Research & Development.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusion of this article is available on request to the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

Participated in research design: KAH, ALR, KYC, CMV, AMVDB. Conducted Experiments: KAH, ALR, KYC, RDV. Contributed reagents or analytical tools: BS, PJ, JZ, AHJD, AMVDB. Performed data analysis: KAH, ALR, KYC, CMV, AMVDB. Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: KAH, ALR, KYC, BS, PJ, JZ, CMF, AHJD, CMV, AMVDB. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

All experimental protocols of this study were approved by our Institutional Ethics Committee [Erasmus MC; permission protocol number EMC 1931 (118–09-04)].

Competing interests

The authors have nothing to disclose. Jannsen was not involved in the experimental design or the interpretation of the results.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Dr Molewaterplein 50, 3015, GE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
(2)
Janssen Research & Development, L.L.C, Welsh and McKean Roads, Spring House, PA 19477, USA
(3)
Departamento de Farmacobiología, Cinvestav-Coapa, Czda. de los Tenorios 235, Col. Granjas-Coapa, Deleg. Tlalpan, C.P, 14330 Ciudad de México, Mexico

References

  1. Edvinsson L, Villalón CM, MaassenVanDenBrink A (2012) Basic mechanims of migraine and its acute treatment. Pharmacol Ther 136:319–333View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Goadsby PJ, Edvinsson L (1993) The trigeminovascular system and migraine: studies characterizing cerebrovascular and neuropeptide changes seen in humans and cats. Ann Neurol 33:48–56View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Mitsikostas DD, Reuter U (2017) Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention: comparisons across randomized controlled studies. Curr Opin Neurol 30:272–280View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Deen M, Correnti E, Kamm K, Kelderman T, Papetti L, Rubio-Beltrán E et al (2017) Blocking CGRP in migraine patients - a review of pros and cons. J Headache Pain 18:96View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Shapiro RE (2007) Caffeine and headaches. Neurol Sci 28(Suppl 2):S179–S183View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Guieu R, Devaux C, Henry H, Bechis G, Pouget J, Mallet D et al (1998) Adenosine and migraine. Can J Neurol Sci 25:55–58View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown SG, Waterer GW (1995) Migraine precipitated by adenosine. Med J Aust 162(389):391Google Scholar
  8. Hawkes CH (1978) Dipyridamole in migraine. Lancet 2:153View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hohoff C, Marziniak M, Lesch KP, Deckert J, Sommer C, Mossner R (2007) An adenosine A2A receptor gene haplotype is associated with migraine with aura. Cephalalgia 27:177–181View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Derry CJ, Derry S, Moore RA (2014) Caffeine as an analgesic adjuvant for acute pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD009281Google Scholar
  11. Burnstock G (2007) Purine and pyrimidine receptors. Cell Mol Life Sci 64:1471–1483View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Burnstock G, Ralevic V (2014) Purinergic signaling and blood vessels in health and disease. Pharmacol Rev 66:102–192View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ngai AC, Coyne EF, Meno JR, West GA, Winn HR (2001) Receptor subtypes mediating adenosine-induced dilation of cerebral arterioles. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280:H2329–H2335View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Shin HK, Park SN, Hong KW (2000) Implication of adenosine A2A receptors in hypotension-induced vasodilation and cerebral blood flow autoregulation in rat pial arteries. Life Sci 67:1435–1445View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kirkup AJ, Eastwood C, Grundy D, Chessell IP, Humphrey PP (1998) Characterization of adenosine receptors evoking excitation of mesenteric afferents in the rat. Br J Pharmacol 125:1352–1360View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Ray CJ, Marshall JM (2006) The cellular mechanisms by which adenosine evokes release of nitric oxide from rat aortic endothelium. J Physiol 570:85–96View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Liang BT, Urso M, Zambraski E, Jacobson KA. Adenosine A3 receptors in muscle protection. A3 Adenosine Receptors from Cell Biology to Pharmacology and Therapeutics. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010. p. 257–280Google Scholar
  18. Haanes KA, Edvinsson L (2014) Expression and characterization of purinergic receptors in rat middle meningeal artery-potential role in migraine. PLoS One 9:e108782View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Lu W, Li B, Chen J, Su Y, Dong X, Su X et al (2016) Expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide, adenosine A2a receptor and adenosine A1 receptor in experiment rat migraine models. Biomed Rep 4:379–383View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Sebastiao AM, Macedo MP, Ribeiro JA (2000) Tonic activation of a(2A) adenosine receptors unmasks, and of a(1) receptors prevents, a facilitatory action of calcitonin gene-related peptide in the rat hippocampus. Br J Pharmacol 129:374–380View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Honey AC, Bland-Ward PA, Connor HE, Feniuk W, Humphrey PP (2002) Study of an adenosine A1 receptor agonist on trigeminally evoked dural blood vessel dilation in the anaesthetized rat. Cephalalgia 22:260–264View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Shook BC, Rassnick S, Hall D, Rupert KC, Heintzelman GR, Hansen K et al (2010) Methylene amine substituted arylindenopyrimidines as potent adenosine a(2A)/a(1) antagonists. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 20:2864–2867View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Labastida-Ramírez A, Rubio-Beltrán E, Villalón CM, MaassenVanDenBrink A (2017) Gender aspects of CGRP in migraine. Cephalalgia 333102417739584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102417739584
  24. McGrath J, Drummond G, McLachlan E, Kilkenny C, Wainwright C (2010) Guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals: the ARRIVE guidelines. Br J Pharmacol 160:1573–1576View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Meno JR, Nguyen TS, Jensen EM, Alexander West G, Groysman L, Kung DK et al (2005) Effect of caffeine on cerebral blood flow response to somatosensory stimulation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 25:775–784View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Arslan G, Kull B, Fredholm BB (1999) Signaling via A2A adenosine receptor in four PC12 cell clones. Naunyn Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 359:28–32View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Ongini E, Dionisotti S, Gessi S, Irenius E, Fredholm BB (1999) Comparison of CGS 15943, ZM 241385 and SCH 58261 as antagonists at human adenosine receptors. Naunyn Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 359:7–10View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Fredholm BB, Battig K, Holmen J, Nehlig A, Zvartau EE (1999) Actions of caffeine in the brain with special reference to factors that contribute to its widespread use. Pharmacol Rev 51:83–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Haanes KA, Spray S, Syberg S, Jorgensen NR, Robaye B, Boeynaems JM et al (2016) New insights on pyrimidine signalling within the arterial vasculature - different roles for P2Y2 and P2Y6 receptors in large and small coronary arteries of the mouse. J Mol Cell Cardiol 93:1–11View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Teng B, Fil D, Tilley SL, Ledent C, Krahn T, Mustafa SJ (2013) Functional and RNA expression profile of adenosine receptor subtypes in mouse mesenteric arteries. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 61:70–76View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Schindler CW, Karcz-Kubicha M, Thorndike EB, Muller CE, Tella SR, Ferre S et al (2005) Role of central and peripheral adenosine receptors in the cardiovascular responses to intraperitoneal injections of adenosine A1 and A2A subtype receptor agonists. Br J Pharmacol 144:642–650View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Koeppen M, Eckle T, Eltzschig HK (2009) Selective deletion of the A1 adenosine receptor abolishes heart-rate slowing effects of intravascular adenosine in vivo. PLoS One 4:e6784View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Hutchison AJ, Webb RL, Oei HH, Ghai GR, Zimmerman MB, Williams M (1989) CGS 21680C, an A2 selective adenosine receptor agonist with preferential hypotensive activity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 251:47–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. de Lera Ruiz M, Lim YH, Zheng J (2014) Adenosine A2A receptor as a drug discovery target. J Med Chem 57:3623–3650View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Halldner L, Lopes LV, Dare E, Lindstrom K, Johansson B, Ledent C et al (2004) Binding of adenosine receptor ligands to brain of adenosine receptor knock-out mice: evidence that CGS 21680 binds to A1 receptors in hippocampus. Naunyn Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 370:270–278View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Ledent C, Vaugeois JM, Schiffmann SN, Pedrazzini T, El Yacoubi M, Vanderhaeghen JJ et al (1997) Aggressiveness, hypoalgesia and high blood pressure in mice lacking the adenosine A2a receptor. Nature 388:674–678View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Patel M, Sheehan MJ, Strong P (1994) Failure of CGS15943A to block the hypotensive action of agonists acting at the adenosine A3 receptor. Br J Pharmacol 113:741–748View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Rivera-Mancilla E, Aviles-Rosas VH, Manrique-Maldonado G, Altamirano-Espinoza AH, Villanueva-Castillo B, MaassenVanDenBrink A et al (2017) The role of alpha1- and alpha2-adrenoceptor subtypes in the vasopressor responses induced by dihydroergotamine in ritanserin-pretreated pithed rats. J Headache Pain 18:104View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Aguirre-Banuelos P, Castaneda-Hernandez G, Lopez-Munoz FJ, Granados-Soto V (1999) Effect of coadministration of caffeine and either adenosine agonists or cyclic nucleotides on ketorolac analgesia. Eur J Pharmacol 377:175–182View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement