Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Concurrent brain structural and functional alterations in patients with migraine without aura: an fMRI study

The Journal of Headache and Pain volume 21, Article number: 141 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Objectives

To explore the possible concurrent brain functional and structural alterations in patients with migraine without aura (MwoA) patients compared to healthy subjects (HS).

Methods

Seventy-two MwoA patients and forty-six HS were recruited. 3D-T1 and resting state fMRI data were collected during the interictal period for MwoA and HS. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) for structure analysis and regional homogeneity (Reho) for fMRI analysis were applied. The VBM and Reho maps were overlapped to determine a possible brain region with concurrent functional and structural alteration in MwoA patients. Further analysis of resting state functional connectivity (FC) alteration was applied with this brain region as the seed.

Results

Compared with HS, MwoA patients showed decreased volume in the bilateral superior and inferior colliculus, periaqueductal gray matter (PAG), locus ceruleus, median raphe nuclei (MRN) and dorsal pons medulla junction. MwoA patients showed decreased Reho values in the middle occipital gyrus and inferior occipital gyrus, and increased Reho values in the MRN. Only a region in the MRN showed both structural and functional alteration in MwoA patients. Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was no association between volume or Reho values of the MRN and headache frequency, headache intensity, disease duration, self-rating anxiety scale or self-rating depression scale in MwoA patients. Resting state functional connectivity (FC) with the MRN as the seed showed that MwoA patients had increased FC between the MRN and PAG.

Conclusions

MRN are involved in the pathophysiology of migraine during the interictal period. This study may help to better understand the migraine symptoms.

Trial registration

NCT01152632. Registered 27 June 2010.

Introduction

Migraine is a paroxysmal neurological disorder, classically characterized by unilateral throbbing, pulsating headache associated with nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia, or allodynia [1]. Between migraine attacks, migraineurs often have accompanying symptoms, such as fatigue, sleep disturbances [2], altered cognition and/or mood changes [3]. According to the 3rd edition of International Classification of Headache Disorders (the most commonly used criteria in research), there are two major types of migraine: migraine without aura (MwoA) and migraine with aura [4]. About 64% of migraine patients fall into MwoA subtype, which is the most prevalent type among migraineurs [5]. Migraine has become an important public health and social issue due to its high prevalence worldwide [6], large medical burden [7], disabling effects [7], and serious reduction in quality of life [8]. However, the pathophysiology of migraine is not fully understood.

Because migraine is mainly a disorder of the brain, neuroimaging studies have great potential to provide insight into the pathophysiology of migraine. Studies using neuroimaging techniques to evaluate brain function or structure in migraine have reported with increasing frequency in recent decades. However, many of these studies either focus on structural or functional changes [9,10,11,12,13], rather than including both. Furthermore, most of these studies are difficult to replicate, and no reproducible biomarkers of migraine have been identified [13]. The significance of defining concurrent functional and structural differences may provide specific insights into the unfolding brain’s adaptive or maladaptive changes in migraineurs.

There are some previous works that have used both structural and functional MRI in migraine. Some studies reporting concurrent brain functional and structural differences in migraineurs are focusing on particular pre-defined brain regions (such as cerebellum [14], hippocampus [15], or only cortical regions [16]) or combining structural analysis with hypothesis-driven functional analysis methods [17,18,19]. One recent study combined global structural analysis (tensor-based morphometry) and hypothesis-free functional analysis (independent component analysis) in migraineurs [20]. In this study, we aim to combine whole brain data-driven analysis methods, i.e. voxel-based morphometry (VBM) [21] for structural analysis, and regional homogeneity (Reho) [22] for functional analysis, in order to explore the possible concurrent functional and structural alterations in migraineurs relative to healthy subjects.

Methods

This study represents the baseline assessment of a registered clinical trial listed on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01152632, June 27, 2010). The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the first teaching hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Participants were enrolled from the outpatient department of the 3rd Teaching Hospital and the campus of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.

Participants

Seventy-two migraineurs without aura (MwoA) were recruited. These patients were diagnosed according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd Edition ICHD-II MwoA criteria [23]. Inclusion criteria required all subjects (1) being between 17 and 45 years of age and right-handed; (2) not taking any prophylactic headache medicine, or acupuncture treatment within the last 3 months before the recruitment; (3) migraines of at least 6 months duration; (4) at least one headache attack per month during the last 3 months, and (5) having signed a written consent form. Subjects were excluded if they had any history of (1) alcohol or drug abuse; (2) pregnancy or experiencing lactation; (3) suffering from psychiatric, neurologic, cardiovascular, respiratory or renal illnesses; (4) suffering from any other chronic pain conditions or having a history of head trauma, with loss of consciousness; (5) having fMRI contraindications, such as claustrophobia.

Forty-six age-matched, right-handed healthy subjects (HS), free from any chronic pain condition (such as migraine and tension type headache), were recruited for this study as controls. In order to exclude organic disease carriers, a basic evaluation was performed in each subject before recruitment, including a review of their medical history, physical examination, hepatic and renal function tests, and routine analysis of blood, urine, and stool. Individuals with any abnormal test results or history of head trauma with loss of consciousness, pregnancy or lactation were excluded.

Patients were instructed and also agreed not to take any regular medications for the treatment of migraines during observation period. In cases of severe pain, ibuprofen (300 mg each capsule with sustained release) was allowed as rescue medication during observation period. All migraine patients in this study were migraine-free for at least 72 h at the time of the MRI scan.

Clinic variables measures

The demographic information (including age, gender, weight and height) of the participants were recorded. The clinical outcomes were the headache intensity (using a 0–10 visual analogue scale (VAS), 0 indicates no pain, 10 indicates worst pain ever) and the frequency of migraine attacks (the number of migraines separated by pain free intervals of at least 48 h of headache) based on patients’ headache diary according to the guidelines of the IHS for Clinical Trials in Migraine [24]. In addition, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) were applied to assess the anxiety and depression status in MwoA patients [2, 25, 26].

MRI data acquisition

MRI data was acquired on a 3.0 T Siemens Trio Tim system equipped with an 8-channel phase-array head coil at the West China Hospital MRI center. Prior to the functional run, a high-resolution structural image for each subject was acquired using a three-dimensional MRI sequence with a voxel size of 1mm3 employing an axial fast spoiled gradient recalled sequence (TR = 1900 ms; TE = 2.26 ms; data matrix, 256 × 256; field of view, 256 × 256 mm2). The blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) resting-state functional images were obtained with echo-planar imaging (30 contiguous slices with a slice thickness of 5 mm; TR = 2000 ms; TE = 30 ms; flip angle, 90°; field of view, 240 × 240 mm2; data matrix, 64 × 64; total volumes, 180). All the participants were instructed to stay awake and to keep their heads still during the scan, with their eyes closed and ears plugged.

Data analysis

Clinical data analysis

The baseline demographic information was analyzed using SPSS16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Between-group comparisons were performed using two sample t-tests or Χ2, as appropriate. The significant level used for the statistical analysis with two sample t-tests was 5%. Continuous variables were presented as the mean with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Categorical variables were described as n (percentage).

VBM analysis

Pre-processing of structural images for VBM analyses was performed using SPM12 (www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk), and the CAT12 toolbox of the MatLab environment [21]. The images acquired for each participant were reoriented to have the same point of origin (anterior commissure) and spatial orientation. A non-linear deformation field was estimated that best overlaid the tissue probability maps on the individual subjects’ images. Three tissue components, including the gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF), were obtained to calculate the overall tissue volume (GM, WM, and CSF volume) and total intracranial volume in the native space. Afterwards, all of the native-space tissue segments were registered to the standard Montreal Neurological Institute template (the standard included in SPM12) using the affine registration algorithm. The diffeomorphic anatomical registration through the exponentiated lie algebra (DARTEL) toolbox was applied to all participants’ GM and WM to refine the inter-subject registration. In the last step of DARTEL, the GM tissues are modulated using a non-linear deformation approach to compare the relative GM volume adjusted for individual brain size. Furthermore, the voxel values in the tissue maps are modulated by the Jacobian determinant that was calculated during spatial normalization [27]. Lastly, each participant’s modulated and normalized GM tissue segments were smoothed with an 8-mm full width at half maximum Gaussian filter. This involved segmentation of raw T1-weighted images into gray matter maps using SPM12, then registration using the nonlinear DARTEL algorithm to Montreal Neurological Institute space and resampling with a 8 mm smoothing kernel. Each tissue class (ie, GM) was processed independently after segmentation. After completing these image analyses, we obtained smoothed and modulated gray matter images to be used for statistical analysis. Two-sample t tests were used to compare the patients and healthy subjects, implementing the total intracranial volume as covariance. The significance of group differences was set at P < 0.05 using family-wise error correction.

Reho and seed based Functional Connectivity (FC) analysis

The rs-fMRI data preprocessing, Reho analysis and seed based FC analysis were performed using the Data Processing Assistant for Resting-State fMRI (DPARSF) software (available at:http://rfmri.org/DPARSF) in MatLab environment. The first 10 volumes were not analyzed to allow for signal equilibration effects. The fMRI images were slice timing corrected, head motion corrected, coregistered to respective structural images for each subject, segmented, regressed out of 6 head motion parameters, white matter signal and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) signal, normalized by using structural image unified segmentation, and then re-sampled to 3-mm cubic voxels. We removed frames with FD > 0.5 mm (‘scrubbing’), one time point before ‘bad’ time points and two time points after ‘bad’ time points were deleted. The data was then detrended, bandpass filtered from 0.01 to 0.08 Hz and smoothed with a 8-mm full-width half-maximum (FWHM) Gaussian kernel for FC analysis.

Reho analysis

We compared the ReHo difference between MwoA patients and HS in SPM12. Individual Reho maps were generated by calculating Kendall’s coefficient concordance (KCC, also called ReHo value) of the time series of a given voxel with its nearest neighbors (26 voxels), on a voxel-wise basis [22]. Then, the data were smoothed with a Gaussian filter of 8 mm full width at half-maximum (FWHM) to reduce noise and residual differences in gyral anatomy. The ReHo maps were generated for each subject in each group. The significance of group differences was set at P < 0.05 using family-wise error correction for statistical analysis.

In order to find the possible regions with both structural (VBM) and functional (Reho) alterations in MwoA patients, the abnormal Reho and VBM maps of MwoA patients were overlapped. Only a region in the brainstem, named MRN [28], showed overlap in MwoA patients (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3). We then extracted the VBM and Reho values of the overlapped region in MRN in MwoA patients and healthy subjects. Pearson correlation analysis was applied between VBM or Reho values and headache intensity, headache frequency or disease duration of MwoA patients.

FC analysis

To further assess the possible correlation of the overlapped region in MRN with other brain regions in MwoA patients, resting state functional connectivity analysis was carried out by using the region in MRN as a seed. The averaged time course was obtained from the seed and the correlation analysis was performed in a voxel-wise way. Contrast images were generated for each subject by estimating the regression coefficient between all brain voxels and each seed’s time series, respectively. The correlation coefficient map was then converted into a Fisher-Z map by Fisher’s r-to-z transform to improve the normality. We compared the resting state functional connectivity difference between MwoA patients and healthy controls using two sample t-tests. A P < 0.05 family wise error corrected at cluster level was applied for all the comparisons.

Results

Baseline characteristics

There was no statistical difference between the MwoA patients and the healthy subjects, in age, gender, weight and height (P > 0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of MwoA patients and healthy subjects
Full size table

VBM and Reho results

VBM

Compared with healthy subjects, MwoA patients showed decreased volume in the bilateral superior and inferior colliculus, periaqueductal grey (PAG), locus ceruleus (LC), median raphe nuclei (MRN) and dorsal pons medulla junction. MwoA patients showed no increased volume in any brain regions, compared with healthy subjects (Table 2 and Fig. 1).

Table 2 The VBM and Reho comparisons between MwoA patients and healthy subjects
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

The VBM and Reho comparisons between MwoA patients and healthy subjects. a. MwoA patients showed lower gray matter volumes in the bilateral superior and inferior colliculus, PAG, LC, MRN and dorsal pons medulla junction compared to HS; b. MwoA patients showed lower Reho values in the right MOG and bilateral IOG compared to HS; c. MwoA patients showed higher Reho values in bilateral MRN compared to HS. A threshold of P < 0.05 family wise error (FWE) correction at cluster level were applied for all comparisons. HS, healthy subjects; IOG, inferior occipital gyrus; L, left side; LC, locus ceruleus; MOG, middle occipital gyrus; MwoA, migraine without aura; PAG, periaqueductal gray; R, right side; Reho, regional homogeneity; MRN, median raphe nuclei; VBM, voxel-based morphometry

Full size image

Reho

Compared with healthy subjects, MwoA patients showed decreased Reho values in the right middle occipital gyrus, inferior occipital gyrus and left middle occipital gyrus, and increased Reho values in the bilateral MRN (Table 2 and Fig. 1).

Only a region in the MRN [28] showed both structural (VBM) and functional (Reho) alterations in MwoA patients. MwoA had decreased volume but increased Reho values in the MRN compared with healthy subjects (Fig. 2). Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was no association between volume or Reho values of the MRN and headache frequency, headache intensity, disease duration, SAS or SDS in MwoA patients (VBM-headache frequency, r = 0.025, p = 0.837; VBM-headache intensity, r = − 0.029, p = 0.809; VBM-disease duration, r = 0.003, p = 0.977; VBM-SAS, r = − 0.039, p = 0.742; VBM-SDS, r = − 0.036, p = 0.762; Reho-headache frequency, r = 0.049, p = 0.682; Reho-headache intensity, r = − 0.023, p = 0.847; Reho-disease duration, r = 0.137, p = 0.250; Reho-SAS, r = 0.058, p = 0.628; Reho-SDS, r = 0.126, p = 0.290).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The VBM and Reho values of the overlapped region in MRN in MwoA patients and healthy subjects. MwoA had decreased gray matter volume but increased Reho values in the median raphe nuclei compared with healthy subjects. Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was no association between volume or Reho values of the MRN and headache frequency, headache intensity or disease duration, SAS and SDS in MwoA patients. HS, healthy subjects; MwoA, migraine without aura; Reho, regional homogeneity; MRN, median raphe nuclei; VBM, voxel-based morphometry

Full size image

Median raphe nuclei FC results

Compared with healthy subjects, MwoA patients showed increased FC between the MRN and PAG. MwoA patients showed no decreased FC between the MRN and any other brain regions, compared with healthy subjects (Table 3 and Fig. 3).

Table 3 Altered median raphe nuclei functional connectivity in MwoA patients
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Altered median raphe nuclei functional connectivity in MwoA patients. MwoA patients showed higher median raphe nuclei functional connectivity with local median raphe nuclei and PAG compared to HS. A threshold of P < 0.05 family wise error (FWE) correction at cluster level were applied for all comparisons. A, anterior; FC, functional connectivity; HS, healthy subjects; MwoA, migraine without aura; P, posterior; PAG, periaqueductal gray; R, right side; Reho, regional homogeneity; MRN, median raphe nuclei; S, superior; VBM, voxel-based morphometry

Full size image

We did not find any correlation between the MRN functional connectivity changes and patients’ clinical features as well as between the other volume or Reho alterations and patients’ clinical variables. To further test the reliability of these results, we added age and gender as covariates for re-analysis of Reho, VBM and FC and got similar results.

Discussion

This study found that MwoA patients had decreased volume but increased ReHo in MRN. Besides, the MRN with both structural and functional alteration had increased resting state functional connectivity with PAG in MwoA patients. However, the correlation analysis showed that the VBM and Reho values of the MRN were not correlated with headache frequency, headache intensity, disease duration, SAS or SDS. This structural and functional neuroimaging study supports the involvement of MRN in the pathophysiology of migraine.

Regional homogeneity (Reho) is a method that applies Kendall’s coefficient of concordance to resting-state BOLD fMRI data in order to measure the similarity of the time series of a given voxel to those of its nearest neighbors in a voxel-wise way [22], which could reflect the local synchronization of spontaneous neural activity, hierarchical organization of the brain and neurodevelopmental factors [29]. Unlike functional connectivity or exploratory independent component analysis node-to-node connectivity which reflect interregional relationship between remote brain regions, Reho is a local spatial scale to measure functional interactions or synchronizations between the neighboring voxels or vertices [29]. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is a computational approach to neuroanatomy that measures differences in local concentrations of brain tissue, through a voxel-wise comparison of multiple brain images [21], which could reflect tissue atrophy or expansion [30]. Both Reho and VBM are data-driven analysis methods, reflecting the functional and structural status in vivo. Studies using Reho [31,32,33,34] or VBM [35,36,37,38,39] alone for patients with migraine have been reported. Whole-brain VBM or Reho studies identified widespread functional and volume alternations in migraineurs, specifically in the frontal cortex and limbic systems [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. However, not all studies reported consistent, stable and replicable findings. To our knowledge, this is the first neuroimaging study combining Reho, VBM and FC to explore the concurrent functional and structural differences in migraineurs, which may provide specific and more reliable insights into the unfolding brain’s adaptive or maladaptive changes in migraineurs.

It is widely accepted that migraine involves activation and sensitization of trigeminovascular pathways [40], as well as brainstem and diencephalic nuclei [41]. This study found that MwoA patients had a concurrent brain structural and functional alteration in MRN. MRN is located in the brainstem, extending from the caudal edge of the superior cerebellar peduncles to the motor nucleus of the Vth cranial nerve [42]. Previous studies report that MRN plays a critical role in the regulation of hippocampal activity and is likely involved in memory consolidation processes [43], depression [44] and anxiety [45]. Besides, MRN is also an important brain region in the human ascending arousal system, which is related with consciousness maintenance and its disorders such as fatigue and sleep disturbance [28]. In migraine patients, recent transcranial sonography studies reported that a hypoechogenic MRN correlated to a higher migraine attack frequency [46] and depression [47]. MRN is the main source of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, also known as serotonin) in the brain [48]. Serotonin is a neurotransmitter that is affected by many physical and emotional processes, including depression, mood, social functioning, exercise, and diet [49]. In migraineurs, decreased levels of serotonin have been observed [50]. Serotonin receptors have been found on the trigeminal nerve and cranial vessels and their agonists especially triptans are effective in migraine treatment [51]. Although there is a growing body of evidence for a direct role for dysfunctions of central 5-HT and MRN availability in migraine, the exact and specific action of endogenous 5-HT system and MRN in migraine continues to be the focus of active investigation [46, 47, 52].

In order to further explore the MRN’s correlation with other brain regions in migraineurs, resting state functional connectivity analysis was applied by taking the region in MRN as the seed. This study found that the MRN had increased functional connectivity with PAG in migraineurs relative to HS. Previous animal neuroanatomy studies reported that the afferences for MRN mainly came from the limbic system, while the efferences were mainly to the lateral cortex, hypothalamus, amygdala, hippocampus, and medial cortex [42]. Some studies also report that MRN contribute serotoninergic projections to both the PAG (especially ventrolateral PAG) and the superior colliculus, the neural circus of which is related with a brain aversive system and pain modulation [53, 54]. The PAG plays a central role in descending pain modulatory system and is closely associated with opioid analgesia [55]. Animal studies also showed that descending modulation of the trigeminocervical complex (TCC), through the ventrolateral PAG and rostral ventromedial medulla, could cause the activation of ‘on’ cells and the inhibition of ‘off’ cells in the rostral ventromedial medulla, which seems to be critical for activation of TCC and development of migraine headache [41, 56, 57]. Taken together, this structural and functional neuroimaging study provide a more reliable evidence supporting the involvement of MRN in the pathophysiology of migraine.

There are several potential limitations in this study. 1) HS did not have SAS and SDS examined, which may have left the depression and anxiety level uncontrolled for migraineurs in this study. 2). This study primarily focused on the headache frequency, headache intensity and disease duration in migraineurs, with the symptoms such as allodynia, fatigue and sleep disturbances unrecorded. 3) This is a descriptive, not a mechanistic study. 4) The time elapsed between the MRI exam and the following migraine attack was not recorded, which might include the prodrome phases as the potential confounding bias. 5) The MRN structure and function alternations in this study are in alignment with many other neuroimaging studies. However, structural changes might affect the local non-linear registration fields and give rise to an observation of falsely positive functional MRI changes. This is a potential limitation for this study.

Conclusion

Concurrent brain structural and functional alterations in MRN suggest that this structure is involved in the pathophysiology of migraine during the interictal period, which might help to better understand the symptoms in migraineurs.

Availability of data and materials

Clinical, neurophysiological and statistical data will be available upon request from any qualified investigator.

Abbreviations

fMRI:

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

MwoA:

Migraine without aura

HS:

Healthy subjects

VBM:

Voxel-based morphometry

Reho:

Regional homogeneity

FC:

Functional Connectivity

MRN:

Median Raphe Nuclei

PAG:

Periaqueductal gray matter

VAS:

Visual analogue scale

IHS:

International Headache Society

SAS:

Self-rating Anxiety Scale

SDS:

Self-rating Depression Scale

BOLD:

Blood oxygen level dependent

GM:

Gray matter

WM:

White matter

CSF:

Cerebral spinal fluid

FWHM:

Full-width half-maximum

KCC:

Kendall’s coefficient concordance

PAG:

Periaqueductal grey

LC:

Locus ceruleus

5-HT:

5-hydroxytryptamine

TCC:

Trigeminocervical complex

References

  1. Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ, Birbeck GL (2013) Migraine: the seventh disabler. J Headache Pain  14:1

  2. Seidel S, Hartl T, Weber M et al (2009) Quality of sleep, fatigue and daytime sleepiness in migraine - a controlled study. Cephalalgia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01784.x

  3. Lipton RB, Hamelsky SW, Kolodner KB et al (2000) Migraine, quality of life, and depression: a population-based case-control study. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.55.5.629

  4. Olesen J (2018) Headache classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) the international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 38(1):1–211

  5. Rasmussen BK, Olesen J (1992) Migraine with aura and migraine without aura: an epidemiological study. Cephalalgia 12:221–228 discussion 186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Jensen R et al (2007) The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia 27(3):193–210

  7. Leonardi M, Steiner TJ, Scher AT, Lipton RB (2005) The global burden of migraine: measuring disability in headache disorders with WHO’s classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). J Headache Pain 6(6):429–440

  8. Guitera V, Muñoz P, Castillo J, Pascual J (2002) Quality of life in chronic daily headache: a study in a general population. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.58.7.1062

  9. Schwedt TJ, Chiang CC, Chong CD, Dodick DW (2015) Functional MRI of migraine. Lancet Neurol 14(1): 81–91

  10. Nyholt DR, Borsook D, Griffiths LR (2017) Migrainomics-identifying brain and genetic markers of migraine. Nat Rev Neurol 13(12):725–741

  11. Jia Z, Yu S (2017) Grey matter alterations in migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. NeuroImage Clin. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.01.019

  12. Messina R, Filippi M, Goadsby PJ (2018) Recent advances in headache neuroimaging. Curr Opin Neurol 31(4):379–385

  13. Van Diessen E, Diederen SJH, Braun KPJ et al (2013) Functional and structural brain networks in epilepsy: what have we learned? Epilepsia 54(11):1855–1865

  14. Mehnert J, May A (2019) Functional and structural alterations in the migraine cerebellum. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X17722109

  15. Maleki N, Becerra L, Brawn J et al (2013) Common hippocampal structural and functional changes in migraine. Brain Struct Funct. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-012-0437-y

  16. Maleki N, Becerra L, Brawn J et al (2012) Concurrent functional and structural cortical alterations in migraine. Cephalalgia. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102412445622

  17. Liu J, Zhao L, Li G et al (2012) Hierarchical alteration of brain structural and functional networks in female migraine sufferers. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051250

  18. Jin C, Yuan K, Zhao L et al (2013) Structural and functional abnormalities in migraine patients without aura. NMR Biomed. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.2819

  19. Hubbard CS, Khan SA, Keaser ML et al (2014) Altered brain structure and function correlate with disease severity and pain catastrophizing in migraine patients. eNeuro. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0006-14.2014

  20. Soheili-Nezhad S, Sedghi A, Schweser F et al (2019) Structural and functional reorganization of the brain in migraine without aura. Front Neurol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00442

  21. Ashburner J, Friston KJ (2000) Voxel-based morphometry - the methods. Neuroimage. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2000.0582

  22. Zang Y, Jiang T, Lu Y et al (2004) Regional homogeneity approach to fMRI data analysis. Neuroimage 22:394–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society(2004) The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia null: 9–160

  24. Tfelt-Hansen P, Block G, Dahlöf C et al (2000) Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: Second edition. Cephalalgia 20(9):765–786

  25. Dunstan DA, Scott N, Todd AK (2017) Screening for anxiety and depression: reassessing the utility of the Zung scales. BMC Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1489-6

  26. Usai S, Grazzi L, D’Amico D et al (2009) Psychological variables in chronic migraine with medication overuse before and after inpatient withdrawal: results at 1-year follow-up. Neurol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-009-0066-2

  27. Good CD, Johnsrude IS, Ashburner J et al (2001) A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0786

  28. Edlow BL, Takahashi E, Wu O et al (2012) Neuroanatomic connectivity of the human ascending arousal system critical to consciousness and its disorders. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e3182588293

  29. Jiang L, Zuo XN (2016) Regional homogeneity: a multimodal, multiscale neuroimaging marker of the human Connectome. Neuroscientist  22(5):486–505

  30. Whitwell JL (2009) Voxel-based morphometry: an automated technique for assessing structural changes in the brain. J Neurosci 29(31): 9661-9664

  31. Chen C, Yan M, Yu Y et al (2019) Alterations in regional homogeneity assessed by fMRI in patients with migraine without Aura. J Med Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1425-z

  32. Zhang J, Su J, Wang M et al (2016) Increased default mode network connectivity and increased regional homogeneity in migraineurs without aura. J Headache Pain. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-016-0692-z

  33. Yu D, Yuan K, Zhao L et al (2013) Regional homogeneity abnormalities affected by depressive symptoms in migraine patients without Aura: A Resting State Study. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077933

  34. Yu D, Yuan K, Zhao L et al (2012) Regional homogeneity abnormalities in patients with interictal migraine without aura: a resting-state study. NMR Biomed. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.1796

  35. Matharu MS, Good CD, May A et al (2003) No change in the structure of the brain in migraine: a voxel-based morphometric study. Eur J Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00510.x

  36. Schmidt-Wilcke T, Gänßbauer S, Neuner T et al (2008) Subtle grey matter changes between migraine patients and healthy controls. Cephalalgia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01428.x

  37. Valfrè W, Rainero I, Bergui M, Pinessi L (2008) Voxel-based morphometry reveals gray matter abnormalities in migraine. Headache. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00723.x

  38. Hougaard A, Amin FM, Hoffmann MB et al (2015) Structural gray matter abnormalities in migraine relate to headache lateralization, but not aura. Cephalalgia. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102414532378

  39. Coppola G, Petolicchio B, Di Renzo A et al (2017) Cerebral gray matter volume in patients with chronic migraine: correlations with clinical features. J Headache Pain. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-017-0825-z

  40. Bernstein C, Burstein R (2012) Sensitization of the Trigeminovascular pathway: perspective and implications to migraine pathophysiology vascular theory of migraine- Extracranial origin vascular theory of migraine- intracranial origin. J Clin Neurol  8(2):89–99

  41. Akerman S, Holland PR, Goadsby PJ (2011) Diencephalic and brainstem mechanisms in migraine. Nat Rev Neurosci 12(10):570–584

  42. Allen WE (2009) Terminologia anatomica: international anatomical terminology and Terminologia Histologica: international terms for human cytology and histology. J Anat. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.1093_1.x

  43. Wang DV, Yau HJ, Broker CJ et al (2015) Mesopontine median raphe regulates hippocampal ripple oscillation and memory consolidation. Nat Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3998

  44. Bach-Mizrachi H, Underwood MD, Kassir SA et al (2006) Neuronal tryptophan hydroxylase mRNA expression in the human dorsal and median raphe nuclei: major depression and suicide. Neuropsychopharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1300897

  45. Andrade TGCS, Zangrossi H, Graeff FG (2013) The median raphe nucleus in anxiety revisited. J Psychopharmacol 27(12):1107–1115

  46. Ayzenberg I, Nastos I, Strassburger-Krogias K et al (2016) Hypoechogenicity of brainstem raphe nuclei is associated with increased attack frequency in episodic migraine. Cephalalgia. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102415617415

  47. Tao WW, Cai XT, Shen J et al (2019) Hypoechogenicity of brainstem raphe correlates with depression in migraine patients. J Headache Pain. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-1011-2

  48. Van De Kar LD, Lorens SA (1979) Differential serotonergic innervation of individual hypothalamic nuclei and other forebrain regions by the dorsal and median midbrain raphe nuclei. Brain Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(79)90754-6

  49. Nichols CD (2014) Serotonin. In: Encyclopedia of the Neurological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385157-4.00048-8.

  50. Sicuteri F (1972) Headache as possible expression of deficiency of brain 5-hydroxytryptamine (central denervation supersensitivity). Headache J Head Face Pain. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.1972.hed1202069.x

  51. Aggarwal M, Puri V, Puri S (2012) Serotonin and CGRP in migraine. Ann Neurosci 19(2):88–94

  52. Dussor G (2014) Serotonin, 5HT1 agonists, and migraine: new data, but old questions still not answered. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 8(2):137–142

  53. Beitz AJ, Clements JR, Mullett MA, Ecklund LJ (1986) Differential origin of brainstem serotoninergic projections to the midbrain periaqueductal gray and superior colliculus of the rat. J Comp Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902500408

  54. Vianna DML, Brandão ML (2003) Anatomical connections of the periaqueductal gray: specific neural substrates for different kinds of fear. Braz J Med Biol Res 36(5):557–566

  55. Behbehani MM (1995) Functional characteristics of the midbrain periaqueductal gray. Prog Neurobiol 46(6):575–605

  56. Porreca F, Ossipov MH, Gebhart GF (2002) Chronic pain and medullary descending facilitation. Trends Neurosci 25(6):319–325

  57. Li Z, Liu M, Lan L et al (2016) Altered periaqueductal gray resting state functional connectivity in migraine and the modulation effect of treatment. Sci Rep 6:20298. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Wei Qin, Jinbo Sun, Jixin Liu, Minghao Dong, Qizhu Wu and Xiaoqi Huang from Xidian University and West China Hospital of Sichuan University for their assistant in this study.

Data availability statement

Raw data were generated at West China Hospital of Sichuan University and Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author Fanrong Liang on request.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81973958, No.81590951, No.81774400), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No.2017 M610593, No.2018 T110954, No.20190037), Major Program of Sichuan Provincial Education Department (No.17ZA0157).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zhengjie Li and Jun Zhou contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Acupuncture & Tuina School / The 3rd Teaching Hospital, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610036, Sichuan, China

    Zhengjie Li, Jun Zhou, Lei Lan, Shirui Cheng, Ruirui Sun, Fang Zeng & Fanrong Liang

  2. Radiology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305, USA

    Zhengjie Li & Max Wintermark

  3. Huaxi MR Research Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China

    Qiyong Gong

Authors
  1. Zhengjie Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jun Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lei Lan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shirui Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ruirui Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Qiyong Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Max Wintermark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Fang Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Fanrong Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study protocol and design: FL, FZ and QG; acquisition of data: LL, JZ, SC, and RS; analysis and interpretation of data: ZL, FZ and MW; and drafting of the manuscript: ZL, JZ and MW. All author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fang Zeng or Fanrong Liang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the 1st Teaching Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. All participants received a complete description of the study and granted written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors disclose no conflicts of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Z., Zhou, J., Lan, L. et al. Concurrent brain structural and functional alterations in patients with migraine without aura: an fMRI study. J Headache Pain 21, 141 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01203-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01203-5

Keywords

The Journal of Headache and Pain

ISSN: 1129-2377

Contact us