Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Estrogen modulation of cortical spreading depression

The Journal of Headache and Pain volume 24, Article number: 62 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background and aims

Cortical spreading depression (CSD), a transient neuronal and glial depolarization that propagates slowly across the cerebral cortex, is the putative electrophysiological event underlying migraine aura and a headache trigger. Migraine is three times more prevalent in women than men, linked to circulating female hormones. High estrogen levels or estrogen withdrawal may be a migraine trigger for many women. We, therefore, aimed to examine whether sex, gonadectomy, and female hormone supplementation and withdrawal affect the susceptibility to CSD.

Methods

To determine CSD susceptibility, we recorded the frequency of CSDs triggered during 2-h topical KCl application in intact or gonadectomized female and male rats, without or with estradiol or progesterone supplementation via daily intraperitoneal injections. Estrogen or progesterone treatment followed by withdrawal was studied in a separate cohort. To take the first step towards identifying potential mechanisms, we studied glutamate and GABAA receptor binding using autoradiography.

Results

The CSD frequency in intact female rats was higher than intact male and ovariectomized rats. We did not detect a change in CSD frequency during different stages of the estrous cycle in intact females. Daily estrogen injections for three weeks did not change CSD frequency. However, one-week estrogen withdrawal after two weeks of treatment significantly increased CSD frequency compared with the vehicle group in gonadectomized females. The same protocol of estrogen treatment and withdrawal was ineffective in gonadectomized males. In contrast to estrogen, daily progesterone injections for three weeks elevated CSD susceptibility, and one-week withdrawal after two weeks of treatment partially normalized this effect. Autoradiography did not reveal significant changes in glutamate or GABAA receptor binding density after estrogen treatment and withdrawal.

Conclusions

These data suggest that females are more susceptible to CSD, and sexual dimorphism is abrogated by gonadectomy. Moreover, estrogen withdrawal after prolonged daily treatment enhances CSD susceptibility. These findings may have implications for estrogen-withdrawal migraine, although the latter tends to be without aura.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Migraine is the most common neurological condition observed in approximately 12–15% of the population, and its prevalence is almost 3 times higher among women than men [1, 2]. This difference starts after puberty and disappears after menopause, peaking between ages 20 and 40, suggesting modulation by female hormones [3]. Migraine attacks can also be influenced by hormonal fluctuations, especially during the female menstrual cycle [4,5,6]. Moreover, female migraine patients who take oral contraceptives may experience more severe migraine attacks during hormone-free intervals, defined as “estrogen-withdrawal migraine”. Altogether, the data suggest that fluctuations in estrogens modulate susceptibility to migraine attacks in women, but the mechanism of this modulation is unknown.

Cortical spreading depression (CSD) is a wave of neuronal and glial depolarization that slowly propagates throughout the cortex irrespective of functional divisions or vascular territories [7]. A link between CSD and migraine aura has been hypothesized for more than 40 years [8,9,10] and is strongly supported by clinical and experimental data [11,12,13,14]. Auras often precede the headache, and experimental data show that CSD can activate the trigeminovascular system resulting in headache [15,16,17]. Since prophylactic drugs that are clinically effective in migraine without aura also suppress CSD [18], the latter may also play a role in the pathophysiology of migraine without aura [14]. However, it is not yet clear how CSD is triggered in migraine patients, although ischemic or epileptic mechanisms have been implicated [19, 20]. Many factors (e.g., genetic, hormonal, environmental) modulate the susceptibility to CSD [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Positive interactions among these factors have also been described in familial hemiplegic migraine type 1 knockin mice [21, 30].

Our study aimed to examine the effect of sex, gonadectomy, and prolonged daily treatment with female hormones and their withdrawal, mimicking daily oral contraceptive use, on CSD susceptibility using a well-established experimental model [18, 31].

Materials and methods

Animals

Experiments were approved by the MGH Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and carried out per the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication No. 85–23, 1996). Rats (Sprague-Dawley, 250–400 g, male and female, intact or gonadectomized; Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA, USA) were housed in a climate-controlled environment and a dark/light cycle of 12 h of daylight and 12 h of darkness with ad libitum access to food and water.

CSD susceptibility

Surgical preparation

Rats were anesthetized using isoflurane (3% for induction, 2% for maintenance during surgical procedures). Bupivacaine (0.25%) was administered locally at surgical sites for analgesia before the incisions. Rats were intubated via a tracheostomy for mechanical ventilation (SAR-830; CWE, Ardmore, PA, USA). Continuous measurement of mean arterial blood pressure (PowerLab; ADInstruments, Colorado Springs, MO, USA) and arterial blood sampling was performed via a femoral artery catheter. Rats were then paralyzed by intraperitoneal pancuronium (0.32–0.40 mg/kg/h) to facilitate mechanical ventilation. Arterial blood gases and pH were measured every 15–30 min and ventilation parameters were adjusted to maintain the arterial pCO2 at 35–45 mmHg (Corning 178 blood gas/pH analyzer; Corning, NY, USA). Rectal temperature was kept at 36.9 to 37.1 °C using a thermostatically controlled heating pad (Frederick Heat Company, Bowdoinham, ME, USA). The level of anesthesia was maintained throughout the procedure to abolish the blood pressure and the heart rate response to tail pinch. Adequate measures were taken to minimize pain or discomfort. Mean arterial blood pressure, pCO2, pO2 and pH were within physiological range for anesthetized and artificially ventilated animals (Table 1) [32].

Table 1 Systemic physiology
Full size table

Electrophysiological recordings

Rats were placed in a stereotaxic frame (David Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA, USA) and three burr holes were drilled under saline cooling over the right hemisphere at the following coordinates (mm from bregma): (1) posterior 5, lateral 2 (occipital cortex, 2 mm diameter for KCl application); (2) posterior 3.5, lateral 2 (parietal cortex, 1 mm diameter, recording site 1); (3) posterior 1, lateral 2 (frontal cortex, 1 mm diameter, recording site 2). At the KCl application hole, dura overlying the occipital cortex was gently removed and care was taken to avoid cortical damage or bleeding, which was an exclusion criterion. The steady (DC) potential and the electrocorticogram were recorded with glass micropipettes filled with 150 mM NaCl, inserted 300 μm below the dural surface (FHC, Inc. Bowdoinham, ME, USA). The Ag/AgCl reference electrode was placed subcutaneously in the neck. After the surgical preparation, the cortex was allowed to recover for 15 min under saline irrigation. The data were continuously recorded using a data acquisition system for offline analysis.

CSD induction

A cotton ball (2 mm diameter) soaked with 1 M KCl was placed on the pial surface and kept moist by placing 5 μl of KCl solution every 15 min. The number of KCl-induced CSDs was counted for 2 h. Propagation speed was calculated from the distance and CSD latency between the recording electrodes 1 and 2. The DC shift amplitude and duration at half-maximal amplitude were also measured. We used the frequency of KCl-induced CSDs (per 2 h) as the primary readout for CSD susceptibility because it generally correlates with CSD threshold measured by other means (e.g., escalating cathodal stimulation [12]), and because CSD frequency yields data with a normal distribution. The propagation speed, duration, and amplitude do not directly relate to CSD susceptibility and are used as important quality control measures (e.g., abnormal systemic physiology, local tissue damage, poor electrode positioning).

Vaginal cytology

To determine the specific estrous stage, vaginal smears were collected by an eyedropper and 0.9% saline. The eyedropper's tip was filled with a small amount of saline and inserted into the vagina. The fluid was expelled into the vagina, collected, placed onto a slide, and examined under a light microscope (× 10–20 magnification), while still wet [33]. Stages were tracked for at least two complete estrous cycles before the experiments to capture a relatively even number of animals in each stage. The final estrous stage determination was performed immediately before anesthesia induction and approximately 80–120 min before CSD recordings, as previously described [23, 25].

Hormone replacement

At least 6 days after gonadectomy, we started treatment with daily intraperitoneal injections of vehicle (0.2 ml sesame oil, n = 12 females, 7 males), β-estradiol-3-benzoate (50 μg/kg/day dissolved daily in sesame oil, n = 6 females, 6 males; Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA), or progesterone [34] (5 mg/kg/day dissolved daily in sesame oil, n = 5 females; Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA) for 21 days in gonadectomized (ovariectomy, Ovx; castration, Cst) rats. In a third group, after 14 days of treatment, either hormone was replaced with the vehicle for 7 days (estrogen withdrawal, n = 6 Ovx, 7 Cst; progesterone withdrawal, n = 6 Ovx).

Enzyme immunoassay for plasma estradiol measurement

Rats were treated with a single or 15-day once-daily intraperitoneal β-estradiol-3-benzoate (50 μg/kg) injection. After the last injection, blood was collected from the femoral artery or the jugular vein at various time points. Blood samples were collected into Microtainer (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), centrifuged at 2700 rcf at 4 °C, and plasma was collected and stored at -80 °C. Plasma concentrations were measured by using Estradiol (E2) Enzyme Immunoassay Test Kit (BioCheck Inc, Foster City, CA, USA). Duplicate or triplicate 25 μl plasma samples were measured using a spectrophotometer according to the manufacturer’s specifications.

Receptor autoradiography

At the end of the electrophysiological recordings, female rats (n = 6 per treatment group) were decapitated while under anesthesia, their brains were rapidly removed and frozen in isopentane chilled to -30 °C in dry ice. Some brains were also harvested from rats that did not undergo electrophysiological recording at the end of the treatment period. Brains were stored at  -80 °C until sectioned. Ten micron-thick sagittal sections were cut using a cryostat microtome (Microm HM505E, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and thaw-mounted onto Superfrost Plus glass slides (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and kept at  -25 °C until used.

Aspartate, AMPA, kainate, NMDA, and GABAA binding sites were visualized by quantitative in vitro receptor autoradiography using D-[3H]aspartate (TRK-606, 28 Ci/mmol, GE Healthcare), [3H]kainate (NET-875, 47 Ci/mmol, PerkinElmer), [3H]AMPA (NET-833, 52 Ci/mmol, PerkinElmer), [3H]MK-801 (ART-661, 17–25 Ci/mmol, American Radiolabeled Chemicals) and [3H]muscimol (NET-574, 14.7 Ci/mmol, PerkinElmer). Specific parameters for each radioligand are listed in Supplemental Table 1, but the general steps were similar. Briefly, sections were brought to room temperature 15 min before preincubation in a radioligand-free buffer (to reduce the levels of endogenous ligands and modulators). Sections were then incubated with nanomolar concentrations of tritiated ligands in the absence (total binding) or in the presence of an excess of unlabeled drug specific for the target receptor (to assess nonspecific binding). After washing steps in ice-cold buffer (to remove unbound radioligand) and a rinse in ice-cold deionized water (to remove salts) or fixation step in 2.5% glutaraldehyde, sections were dried under a stream of cold air and exposed for 1 to 2 weeks to a tritium sensitive film (Amersham 3H-Hyperfilm, Arlington Heights, IL, USA) in a light-tight X-ray cassette. After film processing, radioligand binding in selected brain regions was assessed by measuring the optical density of the autoradiograms using a computerized image analysis system (Imaging Research, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada). The density of specific labeling was obtained by subtracting nonspecific binding from total binding values.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as whisker-box plots or mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Analyses were made using Prism 9 (Graphpad Software, Inc., CA, USA). Individual statistical tests are indicated in text or figure legends. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All data were analyzed in a blinded fashion. The CSD frequency was the primary endpoint in all experiments, on which sample size calculations were based. In the absence of prior experience with gonadal hormone effects on CSD frequency in rats in our lab, the initial sample size calculation empirically targeted 90% power to detect 40% effect size, assuming a coefficient of variation of 25%. After completion of the experiments to reach this sample size, we performed a second power calculation, using the observed effect size and the coefficient of variation in this pilot cohort. If the updated sample size needed to achieve statistical significance was more than 20, we deemed it futile and stopped the experiments. Otherwise, we resumed the experiments to reach the updated sample size. Because experiments were spread over 2 years, we frequently included additional untreated rats as time controls during the later experiments and combined them with the initial cohorts studied; therefore, the sample sizes in the earlier experiments were larger than in the subsequent experiments. Experimental losses due to technical failures also contributed to the variation in sample sizes in different groups and cohorts. All sample sizes and exclusions are indicated in the figure legends. The normal distribution of data was confirmed using the Shapiro-Wilk test for each dataset. Normally distributed data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons and expressed as whisker-box plots. Non-normal distributed data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results

Topical application of 1 M KCl-evoked repetitive CSDs, detected sequentially in serially placed electrodes (Fig. 1), the frequency of which was used as a previously validated measure of CSD susceptibility [35]. The CSD frequency was higher in female rats compared with males, and ovariectomy decreased CSD frequency to the level of males. None of the other CSD attributes differed among the groups. Within the intact female cohort, we did not find a difference in CSD frequency among metestrus/diestrus with low estrogen, proestrus with high estrogen, and estrus with a drop in estrogen (Fig. 2) [36]. These data suggested that gonadal hormones enhance CSD susceptibility in normal cycling females regardless of cycle stage.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of female sex and ovariectomy on CSD susceptibility. Representative DC potentials from DC1 and DC2 recording sites show recurrent CSDs triggered by topical 1 M KCl application onto the occipital cortex. CSD frequency, speed, duration, and amplitude are shown for male (n = 29), female (n = 26) and ovariectomized females (n = 21)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

The estrous cycle stages did not differ in CSD susceptibility. There was no difference among the estrus (n = 7), proestrus (n = 7), and metestrus/diestrus (n = 5) stages in CSD frequency, speed, duration, or amplitude triggered by topical 1 M KCl as shown in Fig. 1. Data shown here are from the female group in Fig. 1

Full size image

We next examined the effect of daily estrogen injections in Ovx rats. First, we measured the plasma levels of β-estradiol after either a single dose or a once-daily dose for 15-days of 50 μg/kg/day intraperitoneal β-estradiol-3-benzoate. Samples were collected at various time points after the last injection. After either a single dose or 15-day treatment, plasma β-estradiol dropped to undetectable levels within 12 h (Fig. 3A). These data showed that intraperitoneal dosing results in transient daily surges rather than steady-state levels. Once-daily β-estradiol-3-benzoate (50 μg/kg/day intraperitoneal) for 21 days did not change CSD frequency; however, withdrawal of estrogen after 14 days significantly elevated CSD frequency compared with the vehicle group (Fig. 3B). Interestingly, the same treatment paradigms did not influence CSD frequency in Cst rats suggesting an interaction with sex (Fig. 4). There was no effect of β-estradiol-3-benzoate treatment or withdrawal on the other CSD attributes (Fig. 3B and 4). Altogether, these data revealed a CSD-enhancing effect of estrogen withdrawal in a prolonged daily dosing paradigm in Ovx rats. Unlike estrogen, once-daily progesterone (5 mg/kg/day intraperitoneal) for 21 days significantly elevated CSD frequency compared with vehicle in Ovx rats. Progesterone withdrawal for 1 week after 14-day treatment reversed this effect (Fig. S1). These data suggested that the effect on CSD susceptibility is hormone-specific.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effects of estradiol replacement and withdrawal in ovariectomized rats on CSD susceptibility. A Plasma concentrations of β-estradiol after a single intraperitoneal injection (left panel) and once-daily intraperitoneal injection (right panel) of 50 μg/kg/day β-estradiol-3-benzoate. Samples were collected at indicated times after the last dose. B Experimental timeline shows the treatment protocol with once-daily intraperitoneal injections in ovariectomized rats. Representative DC potentials from DC1 and DC2 recording sites show recurrent CSDs triggered by topical 1 M KCl application onto the occipital cortex, as shown in Fig. 1. CSD frequency, speed, duration, and amplitude are shown for ovariectomized rats after 3 weeks of vehicle treatment (Ovx + V, n = 12), ovariectomized rats after 3 weeks of 50 μg/kg/day β-estradiol-3-benzoate treatment (Ovx + E, n = 6) and ovariectomized rats treated with 50 μg/kg/day β-estradiol-3-benzoate for 2 weeks followed by withdrawal (Ovx + E/W, n = 6)

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Effects of estradiol replacement and withdrawal in castrated rats on CSD susceptibility. CSD frequency, speed, duration, and amplitude are shown for castrated rats after 3 weeks of vehicle treatment (Cst + V, n = 7), castrated rats after 3 weeks of 50 μg/kg/day β-estradiol-3-benzoate treatment (Cst + E, n = 6) and castrated rats treated with 50 μg/kg/day β-estradiol-3-benzoate for 2 weeks followed by withdrawal (Cst + E/W, n = 7)

Full size image

Lastly, we studied glutamate and GABAA receptor density using autoradiography. The overall distribution of aspartate, AMPA, kainate, NMDA, and GABAA binding sites matched the distributions previously reported. We did not find a significant difference in labeling intensity among the Ovx rats treated with vehicle, Ovx treated with estrogen, and Ovx treated with estrogen followed by withdrawal in any of the brain regions examined (superficial and deep cortex, striatum, hippocampus; Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Receptor autoradiography after estrogen treatment or withdrawal. Aspartate, AMPA, kainate, NMDA, and GABAA binding sites were visualized by quantitative in vitro receptor autoradiography using D-[3H]aspartate, [3H]kainate, [3H]AMPA, [3H]MK-801 and [.3H]muscimol in frozen sections from ovariectomized female rats treated with vehicle (Ovx + V), with β-estradiol-3-benzoate (Ovx + E), or with β-estradiol-3-benzoate followed by withdrawal (Ovx + E/W). Specific radioligand binding in selected brain regions (superficial and deep cortical layers, in the striatum and in hippocampus (CA1, CA2, CA3) was assessed by measuring the optical density of the autoradiograms using a computerized image analysis system (Imaging Research, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada). No significant treatment effect was noted for any of the radioligands. Individual values for each rat (expressed as Relative Optical Densities) are shown, together with group means and SEMs (n = 6 per treatment group)

Full size image

Discussion

We here show that CSD susceptibility displays sex differences and that female rats have a higher susceptibility to CSD than males. These data are consistent with a previous report in rats using comparable methods [23]. We have previously reported a similar phenotype in familial hemiplegic migraine type 1 knockin but not in wild-type mice [21]. However, others have observed a higher CSD susceptibility in female wild-type mice, which was independent of the estrous cycle [37], using methods that may have achieved a higher sensitivity [38]. Lastly, the extracellular threshold [K+]e for eliciting CSD was lower in female rats compared with males [29]. Altogether, we believe these data establish sexual dimorphism in CSD susceptibility.

The lack of variation in CSD susceptibility among the estrous cycle stages in the rat was not surprising given that the total duration of the rat estrous cycle is 4–5 days, compared with the ~ 28-day human menstrual cycle. In the rat, metestrus/diestrus lasts 54–80 h, proestrus 12–14 h, and estrus 25–27 h. Performing the experiments at a precise time within the intended estrous cycle stage is difficult when estrogen levels can peak or trough within a just few hours [39, 40]. Moreover, the effect, as well as the mechanisms of gonadal hormone influence on CSD susceptibility, may be different on a shorter time scale. Prior work in rats using the same method also failed to detect a difference in CSD susceptibility among estrous cycle stages [23, 25]. Others have reported a lower KCl-concentration threshold to trigger CSD in mice during diestrus (i.e., enhanced CSD susceptibility). Interestingly, however, estradiol and progesterone levels measured during the diestrus were 10-fold higher and 3-fold lower, respectively, compared with the estrus stage in that study [26]. Moreover, the endpoint of KCl-concentration threshold to trigger a CSD differs from the frequency of CSDs triggered by continuous topical KCl application used herein [35]. Therefore, a direct comparison between this study and ours is difficult.

The fact that Ovx abrogated the sex difference in CSD frequency indicates that female gonadal hormones modulate CSD susceptibility. However, our daily estrogen replacement paradigm in Ovx rats did not alter KCl-induced CSD frequency, suggesting that simple daily estrogen pulses are not sufficient to reproduce the effect of functioning female gonads on CSD (Fig. 3). In contrast, withdrawal after 2 weeks of daily treatment resulted in elevated CSD frequencies. These data appeared at odds with prior work from one group in a similar rat model where the implantation of 17β-estradiol-releasing capsules for two weeks, aiming for steady serum levels corresponding to proestrus peak, increased KCl-induced CSD frequency [23, 27]. Conversely, withdrawing the 17β-estradiol-releasing capsules resulted in a frequency reduction in that study [23]. Importantly, however, the therapeutic paradigm significantly differed between our study and Chauvel et al. (i.e., daily estrogen injections vs. continuous estrogen-releasing capsules and 7-day vs. 20-h withdrawal, respectively). These data suggest that CSD modulation by daily estrogen injections in our study, where plasma levels peaked within an hour and declined to undetectable levels 12 h after the dose, is opposite to that of steady estrogen elevations for 2 weeks, highlighting the difficulty in pharmacologically recapitulating the ovarian cycle. Another study showed that topical application of β-estradiol in neocortical slices increased the repetition rate of CSDs induced by hypotonic medium [28]; however, obvious methodological differences preclude direct comparisons with our study. Importantly, we also studied castrated rats and did not find any effect of estrogen treatment or withdrawal, suggesting that genetic sex also plays a role in the CSD response to estrogens. It should be noted that all hormone treatment and withdrawal experiments were performed in gonadectomized animals in our study, precluding any interactions with other gonadal hormones.

Previous reports of enhanced CSD susceptibility upon prolonged high serum estradiol are also not congruent with the clinical risk of migraine attacks in relation to ovarian hormones [4, 5, 41]. For example, migraine attacks often improve during pregnancy when blood estradiol is persistently high. More importantly, menstrual migraine occurs just before and during menstruation, coincident with an abrupt drop in blood estradiol, implicating estrogen withdrawal rather than steady elevated levels as the culprit. Similarly, migraine frequency (with or without aura) increases between days 3–7 of the 7-day hormone-free interval in women treated with a combined hormonal contraception [42]. Indeed, the International Classification of Headache Disorders defines estrogen-withdrawal headache or migraine as a headache or a migraine developing within five days after the cessation of daily administration of exogenous estrogen for three weeks or longer and resolving within three days of its onset [43]. Importantly, this type of migraine occurs with daily oral contraceptives, which is associated with diurnal fluctuations in serum estrogen levels that we aimed to approximate [44, 45]. To date, there have been no clinical reports of estrogen-withdrawal migraine after estrogen patches or gels that are associated with steady estrogen elevations.

It is important to note that our estradiol replacement paradigm was not intended to recapitulate the hormonal changes during the normal menstrual cycle but rather approximated daily oral contraceptive use. As such, our estrogen withdrawal likely simulated the 7-day hormone-free interval in women treated with oral contraception rather than the premenstrual hormonal changes, and therefore, more relevant for estrogen-withdrawal migraines than menstrual migraines. Our daily estrogen replacement paradigm did create fluctuation of the plasma estradiol mimicking daily oral contraceptives, and CSD frequency increased seven days after the cessation of the 2-week treatment, congruent with estrogen-withdrawal migraine after oral contraceptive use. It is likely that the plasma half-life of estradiol does not reflect its biological half-life [33] since estradiol remains bound to estrogen receptors in the brain for at least 2 or 3 days [46, 47], and brain concentrations may remain high after treatment cessation, perhaps explaining the latency to an attack.

In contrast to estrogen, daily treatment with progesterone increased CSD frequency in this study. Others have reported a similar increase in CSD frequency after two week-implantation of progesterone capsules to Ovx rats or by single application to female rat neocortical slices [27, 28]. Progesterone and its metabolites have also been shown to enhance neuronal excitability [48, 49]. Therefore, experimental data suggest that progesterone may have an adverse effect on migraine pathophysiology, although clinical data on progesterone modulation of migraine are equivocal [41, 50].

To begin to address possible mechanisms contributing to reduced CSD susceptibility in ovariectomized rats and estrogen withdrawal-induced increased susceptibility, we used in vitro receptor autoradiography to examine the density of binding sites for sodium-dependent excitatory amino-acid transporters (the major transport mechanisms for extracellular glutamate removal in the central nervous system), for the 3 subtypes of ionotropic glutamate receptors and for GABAA receptors. Although glutamatergic and GABAergic transmission are thought to underlie CSD mechanisms, migraine pathophysiology and mechanisms of action of prophylactic antimigraine agents [51], treatment-related changes in CSD susceptibility were not accompanied by changes in any of the binding sites examined. Several studies have used autoradiography to examine changes in receptor binding following ovariectomy and/or chronic estrogen treatment, including glutamate or GABAA. Such studies have reported increases in hippocampal NMDA receptor binding [52, 53], one study showing changes in female but not male rats [54], no effect on kainate or AMPA receptor density [53], and a decrease in GABAA receptors in the frontal cortex [55]. The lack of a difference in NMDA or GABAA binding among treatment groups in our study might be due to differences in treatment regimen or timing. Indeed, the effect of estradiol treatment on receptor densities can vary widely among studies. For example, both increased [56] and decreased [57, 58] [3H]muscimol binding following chronic administration have been reported. Nevertheless, these studies show that receptor autoradiography is sensitive enough to detect changes in receptor binding after interventions affecting female sex hormones. Of course, autoradiography only interrogates receptor binding rather than function. Possible changes at the level of receptor signal transduction and/or channel kinetics may have contributed to function. For example, chronic drug treatment may act downstream from receptors, leaving the density of binding sites unaffected [59]. Electrophysiological methods could more directly examine functional changes in glutamate or GABA receptor activity and could be undertaken in future studies.

As noted above, continuous topical KCl application to calculate the frequency of CSDs differs from CSD threshold determinations by stepwise escalating intensities of electrical stimulation or stepwise escalating concentrations of KCl as models for CSD susceptibility. While the former is indeed inversely, and presumably non-linearly, related to the CSD threshold, it is also influenced by changes in the absolute refractory period after a CSD. In theory, an intervention can influence CSD frequency by selectively altering the refractory period without actually changing the CSD threshold. Therefore, comparisons of our data to previous literature should consider this methodological difference. It should also be noted that other CSD attributes (speed, duration, amplitude) did not differ among any of the groups in this study. These are mainly used as quality control measures (i.e., experimental preparation, cortical integrity) and often lack the sensitivity to detect changes in CSD susceptibility.

Conclusions

In summary, our data demonstrate the sexual dimorphism in CSD susceptibility. Higher CSD susceptibility in female rats did not differ among the estrous cycle stages, likely because of the short cycle duration compared with humans. More importantly, we show that estrogen withdrawal after a 2-week daily replacement paradigm in Ovx rats increased KCl-induced CSD frequency, mimicking estrogen-withdrawal migraines. More work is needed to elucidate the molecular and structural correlates of this enhanced CSD susceptibility. Of course, ovarian hormone modulation of migraine may also involve the nociceptive pathways [60], and mechanisms downstream to CSD should also be examined.

Availability of data and materials

The database during and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CSD:

Cortical spreading depression

Cst:

Castrated

DC:

Direct current

KCl:

Potassium chloride

NaCl:

Sodium chloride

Ovx:

Ovariectomized

rcf:

Relative centrifugal force

SEM:

Standard error of the mean

References

  1. Jensen R, Stovner LJ (2008) Epidemiology and comorbidity of headache. Lancet Neurol 7(4):354–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sakai F, Igarashi H (1997) Prevalence of migraine in Japan: a nationwide survey. Cephalalgia 17(1):15–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta S, Mehrotra S, Villalon CM, Perusquia M, Saxena PR, MaassenVanDenBrink A (2007) Potential role of female sex hormones in the pathophysiology of migraine. Pharmacol Ther 113(2):321–340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin VT, Behbehani M (2006) Ovarian hormones and migraine headache: understanding mechanisms and pathogenesis–part 2. Headache 46(3):365–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Martin VT, Behbehani M (2006) Ovarian hormones and migraine headache: understanding mechanisms and pathogenesis–part I. Headache 46(1):3–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin VT, Lipton RB (2008) Epidemiology and biology of menstrual migraine. Headache 48(Suppl 3):S124-130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ayata C, Lauritzen M (2015) Spreading depression, spreading depolarizations, and the cerebral vasculature. Physiol Rev 95(3):953–993. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00027.2014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kunkler PE, Kraig RP (2003) Hippocampal spreading depression bilaterally activates the caudal trigeminal nucleus in rodents. Hippocampus 13(7):835–844

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Milner PM (1958) Note on a possible correspondence between the scotomas of migraine and spreading depression of Leao. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 10(4):705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lauritzen M, Jorgensen MB, Diemer NH, Gjedde A, Hansen AJ (1982) Persistent oligemia of rat cerebral cortex in the wake of spreading depression. Ann Neurol 12(5):469–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ayata C (2010) Cortical spreading depression triggers migraine attack: pro. Headache 50(4):725–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01647.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ayata C (2009) Spreading depression: from serendipity to targeted therapy in migraine prophylaxis. Cephalalgia 29(10):1095–1114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hadjikhani N, Sanchez Del Rio M, Wu O, Schwartz D, Bakker D, Fischl B et al (2001) Mechanisms of migraine aura revealed by functional MRI in human visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(8):4687–4692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Vincent MB, Hadjikhani N (2007) Migraine aura and related phenomena: beyond scotomata and scintillations. Cephalalgia 27(12):1368–1377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01388.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang X, Levy D, Kainz V, Noseda R, Jakubowski M, Burstein R (2011) Activation of central trigeminovascular neurons by cortical spreading depression. Ann Neurol 69(5):855–865. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22329

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang X, Levy D, Noseda R, Kainz V, Jakubowski M, Burstein R (2010) Activation of meningeal nociceptors by cortical spreading depression: implications for migraine with aura. J Neurosci 30(26):8807–8814. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0511-10.2010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Harriott AM, Chung DY, Uner A, Bozdayi RO, Morais A, Takizawa T et al (2021) Optogenetic spreading depression elicits trigeminal pain and anxiety behavior. Ann Neurol 89(1):99–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ayata C, Jin H, Kudo C, Dalkara T, Moskowitz MA (2006) Suppression of cortical spreading depression in migraine prophylaxis. Ann Neurol 59(4):652–661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nozari A, Dilekoz E, Sukhotinsky I, Stein T, Eikermann-Haerter K, Liu C et al (2010) Microemboli may link spreading depression, migraine aura, and patent foramen ovale. Ann Neurol 67(2):221–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21871

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tamim I, Chung DY, de Morais AL, Loonen ICM, Qin T, Misra A et al (2021) Spreading depression as an innate antiseizure mechanism. Nat Commun 12(1):2206. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22464-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Eikermann-Haerter K, Dilekoz E, Kudo C, Savitz SI, Waeber C, Baum MJ et al (2009) Genetic and hormonal factors modulate spreading depression and transient hemiparesis in mouse models of familial hemiplegic migraine type 1. J Clin Invest 119(1):99–109. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI36059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Balkaya M, Seidel JL, Sadeghian H, Qin T, Chung DY, Eikermann-Haerter K et al (2019) Relief following chronic stress augments spreading depolarization susceptibility in familial hemiplegic migraine mice. Neuroscience 415:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.07.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chauvel V, Multon S, Schoenen J (2018) Estrogen-dependent effects of 5-hydroxytryptophan on cortical spreading depression in rat: modelling the serotonin-ovarian hormone interaction in migraine aura. Cephalalgia 38(3):427–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102417690891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brennan KC, Beltran-Parrazal L, Lopez-Valdes HE, Theriot J, Toga AW, Charles AC (2007) Distinct vascular conduction with cortical spreading depression. J Neurophysiol 97(6):4143–4151. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00028.2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chauvel V, Vamos E, Pardutz A, Vecsei L, Schoenen J, Multon S (2012) Effect of systemic kynurenine on cortical spreading depression and its modulation by sex hormones in rat. Exp Neurol 236(2):207–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.05.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ebine T, Toriumi H, Shimizu T, Unekawa M, Takizawa T, Kayama Y et al (2016) Alterations in the threshold of the potassium concentration to evoke cortical spreading depression during the natural estrous cycle in mice. Neurosci Res 112:57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2016.06.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chauvel V, Schoenen J, Multon S (2013) Influence of ovarian hormones on cortical spreading depression and its suppression by L-kynurenine in rat. PLoS One 8(12):e82279. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082279

  28. Sachs M, Pape HC, Speckmann EJ, Gorji A (2007) The effect of estrogen and progesterone on spreading depression in rat neocortical tissues. Neurobiol Dis 25(1):27–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Adamek S, Vyskocil F (2011) Potassium-selective microelectrode revealed difference in threshold potassium concentration for cortical spreading depression in female and male rat brain. Brain Res 1370:215–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Negro A, Seidel JL, Houben T, Yu ES, Rosen I, Arreguin AJ et al (2020) Acute sleep deprivation enhances susceptibility to the migraine substrate cortical spreading depolarization. J Headache Pain 21(1):86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01155-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kudo C, Nozari A, Moskowitz MA, Ayata C (2008) The impact of anesthetics and hyperoxia on cortical spreading depression. Exp Neurol 212(1):201–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Skelton JL, Gardner-Medwin AR, George SA (1983) The effects of carbon dioxide, oxygen and pH on spreading depression in the isolated chick retina. Brain Res 288(1–2):229–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Becker JB, Arnold AP, Berkley KJ, Blaustein JD, Eckel LA, Hampson E et al (2005) Strategies and methods for research on sex differences in brain and behavior. Endocrinology 146(4):1650–1673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wong R, Ray D, Kendall DA (2012) Progesterone pharmacokinetics in the mouse: implications for potential stroke therapy. J Pharm Pharmacol 64(11):1614–1620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.2012.01537.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ayata C (2013) Pearls and pitfalls in experimental models of spreading depression. Cephalalgia 33(8):604–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102412470216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ajayi AF, Akhigbe RE (2020) Staging of the estrous cycle and induction of estrus in experimental rodents: an update. Fertil Res Pract 6:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00074-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Brennan KC, Romero Reyes M, Lopez Valdes HE, Arnold AP, Charles AC (2007) Reduced threshold for cortical spreading depression in female mice. Ann Neurol 61(6):603–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Charles A, Brennan K (2009) Cortical spreading depression-new insights and persistent questions. Cephalalgia 29(10):1115–1124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Westwood FR (2008) The female rat reproductive cycle: a practical histological guide to staging. Toxicol Pathol 36(3):375–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623308315665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chai NC, Peterlin BL, Calhoun AH (2014) Migraine and estrogen. Curr Opin Neurol 27(3):315–324. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. MacGregor EA (2004) Oestrogen and attacks of migraine with and without aura. Lancet Neurol 3(6):354–361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Merki-Feld GS, Epple G, Caveng N, Imthurn B, Seifert B, Sandor P et al (2017) Temporal relations in hormone-withdrawal migraines and impact on prevention- a diary-based pilot study in combined hormonal contraceptive users. J Headache Pain 18(1):91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-017-0801-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) (2018). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 38(1):1–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102417738202.

  44. Todd C, Lagman-Bartolome AM, Lay C (2018) Women and migraine: the role of hormones. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 18(7):42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-018-0845-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Edlow AG, Bartz D (2010) Hormonal contraceptive options for women with headache: a review of the evidence. Rev Obstet Gynecol 3(2):55–65

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Schwartz SM, Blaustein JD, Wade GN (1979) Inhibition of estrous behavior by progesterone in rats: role of neural estrogen and progestin receptors. Endocrinology 105(5):1078–1082

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Walker WA, Feder HH (1977) Anti-estrogen effects on estrogen accumulation in brain cell nuclei: neurochemical correlates of estrogen action on female sexual behavior in guinea pigs. Brain Res 134(3):467–478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kapur J, Joshi S (2021) Progesterone modulates neuronal excitability bidirectionally. Neurosci Lett 744:135619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135619

  49. Shiono S, Sun H, Batabyal T, Labuz A, Williamson J, Kapur J et al (2021) Limbic progesterone receptor activity enhances neuronal excitability and seizures. Epilepsia 62(8):1946–1959. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.16970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Martin VT, Wernke S, Mandell K, Ramadan N, Kao L, Bean J et al (2005) Defining the relationship between ovarian hormones and migraine headache. Headache 45(9):1190–1201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.00242.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Costa C, Tozzi A, Rainero I, Cupini LM, Calabresi P, Ayata C et al (2013) Cortical spreading depression as a target for anti-migraine agents. J Headache Pain 14:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-14-62

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Woolley CS, Weiland NG, McEwen BS, Schwartzkroin PA (1997) Estradiol increases the sensitivity of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells to NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic input: correlation with dendritic spine density. J Neurosci 17(5):1848–1859. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-05-01848.1997

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Weiland NG (1992) Estradiol selectively regulates agonist binding sites on the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor complex in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. Endocrinology 131(2):662–668. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.131.2.1353442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Romeo RD, McCarthy JB, Wang A, Milner TA, McEwen BS (2005) Sex differences in hippocampal estradiol-induced N-methyl-D-aspartic acid binding and ultrastructural localization of estrogen receptor-alpha. Neuroendocrinology 81(6):391–399. https://doi.org/10.1159/000089557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Francois-Bellan AM, Segu L, Hery M (1989) Regulation by estradiol of GABAA and GABAB binding sites in the diencephalon of the rat: an autoradiographic study. Brain Res 503(1):144–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(89)91715-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Maggi A, Perez J (1984) Progesterone and estrogens in rat brain: modulation of GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid) receptor activity. Eur J Pharmacol 103(1–2):165–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(84)90205-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Goetz C, Bourgoin S, Cesselin F, Brandi A, Bression D, Martinet M et al (1983) Alterations in central neurotransmitter receptor binding sites following estradiol implantation in female rats. Neurochem Int 5(4):375–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-0186(83)90066-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Hamon M, Goetz C, Euvrard C, Pasqualini C, Le Dafniet M, Kerdelhue B et al (1983) Biochemical and functional alterations of central GABA receptors during chronic estradiol treatment. Brain Res 279(1–2):141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(83)90172-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Pejchal T, Foley MA, Kosofsky BE, Waeber C (2002) Chronic fluoxetine treatment selectively uncouples raphe 5-HT(1A) receptors as measured by [(35)S]-GTP gamma S autoradiography. Br J Pharmacol 135(5):1115–1122. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0704555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Martin VT, Lee J, Behbehani MM (2007) Sensitization of the trigeminal sensory system during different stages of the rat estrous cycle: implications for menstrual migraine. Headache 47(4):552–563

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

CK was supported by AHS/Merck US Human Health Migraine and Women’s Health Research Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neurovascular Research Unit, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA

    Chiho Kudo, Andrea M. Harriott, Michael A. Moskowitz, Christian Waeber & Cenk Ayata

  2. Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Suita, Osaka, 5650871, Japan

    Chiho Kudo

  3. Stroke Service, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA

    Andrea M. Harriott & Cenk Ayata

  4. School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

    Christian Waeber

  5. Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

    Christian Waeber

Authors
  1. Chiho Kudo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea M. Harriott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael A. Moskowitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christian Waeber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cenk Ayata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CA designed the study, CK collected the data, CK, CW and CA analyzed the data, CK, AMH, MAM, CW and CA drafted the manuscript, and all authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cenk Ayata.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures were conducted in compliance with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines for use of laboratory animals and institutional guidelines for animal care and use for research purposes were strictly followed and the study was approved by institutional review board. All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplemental Table 1.

Specific parameters for the quantitative in vitro receptor labeling protocol for each radioligand.

Additional file 2:

 Figure S1. Effects of progesterone replacement and withdrawal in ovariectomized rats on CSD susceptibility. CSD frequency, speed, duration, and amplitude are shown for ovariectomized rats after 3 weeks of vehicle (Ovx+V, n = 12) or 5 mg/kg/day progesterone treatment (Ovx+P, n = 5) or progesterone treatment for 2 weeks followed by withdrawal (Ovx+P/W, n = 6).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kudo, C., Harriott, A.M., Moskowitz, M.A. et al. Estrogen modulation of cortical spreading depression. J Headache Pain 24, 62 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01598-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01598-x

Keywords

The Journal of Headache and Pain

ISSN: 1129-2377

Contact us