Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Brain structure and cortical activity changes of new daily persistent headache: multimodal evidence from MEG/sMRI

The Journal of Headache and Pain volume 24, Article number: 45 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

New daily persistent headache (NDPH) is a rare but debilitating primary headache disorder that poses a significant burden on individuals and society. Despite its clinical importance, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of NDPH remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the brain structural changes and neural activity patterns in patients with NDPH using multimodal brain imaging analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) combined with magnetoencephalography (MEG).

Methods

Twenty-eight patients with NDPH and 37 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited for this study, and their structural and resting-state data were collected by 3.0 Tesla MRI and MEG. We analyzed the brain morphology using voxel-based morphometry and source-based morphometry. In each brain region, MEG sensor signals from 1 to 200 Hz were analyzed using an adapted version of Welch's method. MEG source localization was conducted using the dynamic statistical parametric mapping, and the difference of source distribution between patients with NDPH and HCs was examined.

Results

Our results revealed significant differences in the regional grey matter volume, cortical thickness, and cortical surface area between the two groups. Specifically, compared with HCs, patients with NDPH showed a significant decrease in cortical thickness of the left rostral cortex in the middle frontal gyrus, decreased cortical surface area of the left fusiform gyrus, decreased grey matter volume of the left superior frontal gyrus and the left middle frontal gyrus, and increased grey matter volume of the left calcarine. Furthermore, the power of the whole brain, bilateral frontal lobes, and right temporal lobe in the NDPH group were higher than that in HCs in the ripple frequency band (80-200 Hz). Functional and structural analysis suggested that there were structural changes and abnormal high frequency cortical activity in both frontal and temporal lobes in patients with NDPH.

Conclusion

Our findings indicated that patients with NDPH have abnormalities in brain morphology, such as cortical area, cortical thickness, and grey matter volume, accompanied by abnormal cortical neural activity. Brain structural changes in the frontotemporal cortex and abnormalities in cortical ripple activity may be involved in the pathogenesis of NDPH.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

New daily persistent headache (NDPH) is a specific type of primary headache, first described as benign persistent daily headache syndrome by Vanast in 1986 [1]. The overall 1-year prevalence of NDPH was 0.03% [2]. The NDPH has unique characteristics, and the diagnostic criteria for International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd Editon (ICHD-3) clearly state that the patients can accurately recall the onset of the headache and that the headache lasts for more than three months [3]. The headache can persist for many years after treatment, placing a considerable burden on society and individuals.

The headache forms of NDPH could be similar to migraine and tension-type headache, and the types of headaches are heterogeneous. Therefore, some scholars have pointed out whether NDPH can be treated as a separate disease or a companion symptom of other diseases [4]. Consistent precipitating factors (infection, stress, and trauma) were not found in NDPH in the available case reports, and the pathophysiology of NDPH is unclear [5].

Neuroimaging is one of the most outstanding achievements of modern science and is widely used in the study of primary headaches. In 1996, Cicek used MRI analysis and found changes in brain structure in patients with primary headaches [6]. Although this study did not analyze the degree of structural changes in brain regions in detail, it formed the basis for structural imaging related to primary headaches. A study of resting-state functional imaging and structural imaging revealed changes in specific brain regions of patients with NDPH [7]. However, other NDPH structural imaging studies reported no significant brain structural changes in patients with NDPH [8, 9]. Studies on the brain function of NDPH are even more scarce. In adolescents, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analysis has shown that patients with NDPH had altered functional connectivity in the amygdala, insula, frontal lobe, and cerebellum [10]. The functional connectivity between brain regions related to pain, emotion, and within cognitive networks were altered, suggesting that NDPH may be associated with brain dysfunction, which provides a direction for future research [7]. However, there were few studies focusing on both the structure and function of patients with NDPH, and the limited evidence only focused on adolescents.

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is an established method that assesses the magnetic fields generated by electrical activity in neurons [11]. Compared with electroencephalography (EEG), MEG is less affected by soft scalp tissue, skull, and other tissues, so it has a high spatial resolution (about 5 mm). In contrast to fMRI, MEG has a much higher temporal resolution and directly measures electromagnetic signals produced by neurons rather than by changes in blood oxygen that accompany neural activity [12].

Overall, we conducted a multimodal neuroimaging analysis using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and source-based morphometry (SBM) analysis in structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) combined with MEG. We compared brain structure and function between patients with NDPH and carefully matched healthy controls (HCs). Our hypothesis was that changes in brain morphology in patients with NDPH are accompanied by changes in cortical activity. Additionally, we assessed whether a correlation exists between clinical features and structure in patients with NDPH to shed light on the pathophysiology of NDPH.

Methods

Study population

Between October 2020 and October 2022, 30 patients with NDPH and 40 HCs were recruited from the Headache Department, Neurology Centre, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University. Each patient with NDPH needed to be diagnosed by at least two neurological specialists. Inclusion criteria for patients with NDPH included: (1) Patients who satisfied the definition of NDPH according to ICHD-3 criteria [3]; (2) All participants ranged in age from 14 to 70 years. Exclusion criteria included: (1) Patients combined with other types of primary headache or major systemic diseases; (2) Claustrophobia or metal implants in the body; (3) Poor quality of data (MRI had obvious errors in image segmentation or had a conspicuous abnormality that precluded accurate MEG image registration); (4) Pregnancy or breastfeeding. Patients with NDPH required a headache history registry (headache history, frequency of headache, medication of treatment) and clinical scale assessment at the same time of the MEG acquisition. The Headache Impact Test -6 (HIT-6) score was used to determine the impact intensity of headache [13]. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scores were used to evaluate anxiety and depression symptoms [14, 15]. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score was used to assess the quality of sleep [16]. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was used to assess the level of pain [17].

In addition, age- and sex-matched HCs were recruited. The inclusion criteria for HCs included: (1) No history or family history of headache, no headache episodes in the previous 1 year; (2) Match age and sex to patients of NDPH. Exclusion criteria for HCs include: (1) Major systemic diseases; (2) Claustrophobia or metal implants in the body; (3) Poor quality of data (MRI had obvious errors in image segmentation or had a conspicuous abnormality that precluded accurate MEG image registration); (4) Pregnancy or breastfeeding. The history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV2) infection was recorded for all participants.

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Committee of Beijing Tiantan Hospital of Capital Medical University (KY2022-044), which was registered on the https://www.clinicaltrials.gov (unique identifier: NCT05334927). All participants provided informed written consent according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

MRI data acquisition

All participants were imaged with a 3.0 Tesla MR scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) by standard head coil at Beijing Tiantan Hospital. This was examined by an experienced neuroradiologist who knew nothing about the participants’ diagnosis. Participants were required to avoid head and neck movements as much as possible, stay awake, relax, and keep eyes closed during the MRI scanning, with earplugs and foam padding to reduce scanner noise and head-movement. Only images without obvious quality problems and pathological changes were included in further analyses. T1-weighted volumetric images were obtained by the 3D BRAVO sequence (coronal acquisition, the field of view (FOV) = 256 mm, acquisition matrix = 256, slice number = 192, flip angle = 15°, TR = 850 ms, TE = 320 ms, voxel size = 1 x 1 x 1.5 mm3).

MEG data acquisition

The Elekta Neuromag 306-channel scanner (Elekta TRIUX ®) was used in this study to record neural activity at 2000 Hz with a low-pass filter set to 660 Hz. Each sensor element consists of a magnetometer and two orthogonal planar gradiometers. Four head position indicator (HPI) coils were placed on the participants’ scalp to indicate head position. Furthermore, coordinates of head points were digitized (Polhemus Fastrak®) for MRI co-registration, including nasion, anterior points in front of the ear points, and about 300 additional points on the scalp. These flags and head position points were used to register the MEG and MRI coordinate systems further. A pair of electrodes were placed and attached to the participants’ chests to capture electrocardiogram synchronized with the MEG recording. Two electrodes were attached above and below eye to detect electro-ocular activity. Five continuous minutes of MEG resting-state data were acquired per participant on the Elekta Neuromag 306-channel scanner. The participant was laid comfortably in the scanner and instructed to remain awake and close eyes, but without performing any specific task. MEG scan would be restarted if the participant falls asleep or has excessive head movements during the scan. Because NDPH was a persistent headache, all patients experienced headaches during the scan.

MRI processing

Voxel-Based Morphometry

The structural image data was converted to NIFTI format by MRIcron software. The SPM12 (https://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm12) and CAT12 (https://neuro-jena.github.io/cat/) toolboxes were used for data processing and analysis. All images were first spatially normalized using the standard Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) template in SPM12. Each normalized image was segmented into grey matter (GM), white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid, and the segmented data was quality checked to exclude participants with obvious errors in image segmentation. The segmented GM images were averaged and smoothed (FWHM = 8 mm), and CAT12 was used to estimate the volume and total intracranial volume (TIV) of different brain tissue classes for statistical analysis.

Surface-based morphometry

The FreeSurfer software package was used to analyze the participants’ T1 structural image data (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu), including head movement correction, normalization, removal of non-brain tissue, registration of MNI standard space, segmentation and smoothing of grey-white matter boundaries. The white matter surface was then deformed towards the GM boundary of each vertex. Cortical thickness was calculated based on the distance between the white matter boundary and the GM boundary at each vertex, with visual inspection of the entire cortex of each study participant and manual editing of inaccurate segmentation. According to the Desikan-Killiany Atlas, the brain was divided into 68 cortical regions. Regional average cortical thickness and area estimates were calculated by averaging all vertices.

MEG processing

According to the MEG sensor position, 306 channels were divided into eight brain regions (left and right frontal, parietal, occipital, and temporal lobe). All bad channels were detected and excluded before passing the raw data through MaxFilter. A band-pass filter between 1 to 200 Hz was applied. The raw data was removed line noise of 50 Hz power, and downsampled to 1000 Hz. Using independent component analysis (ICA), components such as ocular and cardiac artifacts were removed.

Welch's algorithm was used to calculate the MEG sensor power spectral density for each participant at the sensor level. In order to quantify brain activation in individual brain regions, the result was calculated using the mean of each frequency band of the sensor. Intergroup comparisons were carried out in six frequency bands: delta (1-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-13 Hz), beta (13-30 Hz), gamma (30-80 Hz), and ripple (80-200 Hz). In the source level, the boundary element model was created and the MRI was co-registered with 3D digitized coordinates. And surface-based source space was computed. The forward solution could be calculated with the magnetic fields and electric potentials at the measurement sensors. Then, the inverse problem and noise covariance were computed. And used dynamic statistical parametric mapping (dSPM) for source estimation. The dSPM method was based on the generalized least-squares or weighted minimum-norm estimate, normalized for noise sensitivity [18, 19]. It transformed the resulting source strengths relative to noises into an F-distributed statistical parameter value at each source. The dSPM F-values were summed for each vertex over the entire time series. The vertex with the largest sum of F-values was identified and defined it as the most active area [20] (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The pipeline of resting-state magnetoencephalographic spectral and source analysis

Full size image

Statistical analysis

The sample size was determined based on the available data and previous literature. Assuming no negative correlation between endpoints, a sample size of 65 cases (37 HC group and 28 NDPH group) would provide 85% power to reject the null hypothesis equal means at a two-sided alpha of 0.05. IBM SPSS 22.0 was used to perform the statistical analysis. Mean ± standard deviation and median with interquartile range were described as the normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. Categorical variables were expressed as number (percentage). The comparison of continuous and categorical variables between the patient and HC groups was carried out using independent sample t-test and chi-square test respectively in demographic and clinical data. Before the independent sample t-test, we test the normality of the data by the Kruskal–Wallis test. The Mann–Whitney U test was applied to compare non-normally distributed data between the groups. Correlations between GM, cortical thickness, surface area, and demographic data were calculated using Pearson’s correlation (statistical tests were carried out at p < 0.002 [0.05/25] significance level after Bonferroni correction). All statistical tests are two-tailed tests, with P < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Covariates consist of age, sex, and TIV, and independent sample t-tests were used to compare GM volume between groups. Using the general linear model (GLM), age and sex were included as covariates, detected average cortical thickness and the surface area of 68 cerebral cortical regions between groups. This study used an uncorrected threshold of P < 0.01 for initial vertex-wise comparisons. To correct for multiple comparisons, a Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 times was performed. Only the cluster with a continuous extent of 100 vertices and a significance threshold of P < 0.05 in the cluster level were reported. The independent sample t-test was used to compare the power spectral density of the MEG sensor between groups, and FDR correction was performed. The difference in the distribution of magnetic source activity between patients and the HC groups was compared by Fisher's exact test (α = 0.05).

Results

Clinical characteristics and demographics

Thirty patients (14 males and 16 females) with NDPH were recruited and willing to participate in this study. A total of 40 well-matched HCs were recruited. Two patients and 3 HCs were excluded due to poor quality of data, segmentation errors. Finally, twenty-eight patients with NDPH (14 males, 14 females) and 37 HCs (16 males, 21 females) were included in this study. There were no significant differences in age and sex between the groups. All participants were right-handed and no SARS-CoV2 infection before developing headache. The median onset time of NDPH was 17 years, and the median duration was 3.5 years, ranging from 1 to 14 years. The clinical manifestations of the NDPH group were mainly nausea and vomiting (7.14%), photophobia (39.28%), and phonophobia (53.57%). Three patients were unwilling to cooperate with the completion of HIT-6, GAD-7, and PSQI scale assessments, and two patients with NDPH were reluctant to cooperate with the completion of the PHQ-9 scale evaluation. Demographic and clinical features are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Participants’ demographics and clinical characteristics
Full size table

Brain morphological changes in patients with NDPH

Compared with HCs, patients with NDPH had decreased cortical thickness of the left rostral middle frontal gyrus (left, MNI x/y/z = -24.6/35.5/28.8, cluster size = 116.78, p = 0.002), decreased cortical surface area of the left fusiform gyrus (left, MNI x/y/z = -40.7/-72.1/-13.9, cluster size = 48.36, p = 0.006) (Table 2) (Fig. 2), decreased GM volume of the left superior frontal gyrus and the left middle frontal gyrus (left, MNI x/y/z = -21.0/21.0/56.0, cluster size = 515, t = -3.23, p = 0.002), increased GM volume of the left calcarine (left, MNI x/ y/z = -24.0/-74.0/9.0, cluster size = 308, t = 3.69, p = 0.032) (Table 3) (Fig. 3).

Table 2 Brain region with cortical thickness and surface area changes in patients with NDPH
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

The abnormal cortical thickness and surface area in NDPH. A The NDPH group showed significantly decreased cortical thickness in the left rostral middle frontal gyrus compared with HCs. B The NDPH group showed significantly decreased cortical surface area in the left fusiform gyrus compared with HCs. HCs, healthy controls; NDPH, new daily persistent headache;  L Left; R Right

Full size image
Table 3 Brain region with grey matter volume changes in patients with NDPH
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

The abnormal grey matter volume in NDPH. A The NDPH group showed decreased grey matter volume in the left superior frontal and middle frontal gyrus compared with HCs. B The NDPH group showed increased grey matter volume in the calcarine compared with HCs. HCs, healthy controls; NDPH, new daily persistent headache;  L Left; R Right

Full size image

MEG analysis

There was no significant difference in delta and beta bands power between patients with NDPH and HCs. Patients' resting-state neural oscillations altered, with an increase in theta band power in the left frontal (p = 0.041) and right frontal (p = 0.021). Patients with NDPH showed increased alpha band power in the left frontal (p = 0.021), increased gamma band power in the right frontal lobe (p = 0.010), and right temporal lobe (p = 0.006). The NDPH group had significantly increased ripple band power of the whole brain (p = 0.006), left frontal lobe (p = 0.044), right frontal lobe (p < 0.001), and right temporal lobe (p = 0.002) (Table 4). The statistical results of the power spectrum between all groups are shown in Table S1. In the source analysis, there was a significant difference in the distribution of neuromagnetic activity regions between the NDPH group and the HC group (p = 0.030) in the ripple band (Fig. 4). In other frequency bands, the distribution of neuromagnetic activity regions was not statistically significant (Table S2).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The distribution of neuromagnetic activity in the ripple band. The distribution of the neuromagnetic activity was significantly different between the HC and NDPH groups. HC, healthy control; NDPH, new daily persistent headache. L_F, left frontal lobe; R_F, right frontal lobe; L_P, left parietal lobe; R_P, right parietal lobe; L_O, left occipital lobe; R_O, right occipital lobe; L_T, left temporal lobe; R_T, right temporal lobe

Full size image
Table 4 The power spectral density of each frequency band
Full size table

Correlation analysis

The relationship between brain regions with statistically different structures and clinical features in all patients with NDPH was as follows. The GM volume of the left middle frontal gyrus was negatively correlated with the HIT-6 score (p = 0.030, r = -0.443, n = 25) and PSQI score (p = 0.021, r = -0.467, n = 25). The GM volume of the left superior frontal gyrus was negatively correlated with the HIT-6 score (p = 0.022, r = -0.465, n = 25) and PSQI score (p = 0.034, r = -0.433, n = 25). The cortical thickness of the left rostral middle frontal gyrus was negatively correlated with the VAS score (p = 0.049, r = -0.368, n = 28) and PSQI score (p = 0.039, r = -0.415, n = 25). The cortical surface area of left fusiform gyrus was negatively correlated with the PHQ-9 score (p = 0.043, r = -0.400, n = 26). Clinical features, including VAS, PHQ-9, GAD-7, HIT-6, and PSQI scores, were not significantly correlated with all brain morphology data after Bonferroni correction.

Discussion

In this study, we performed the first multimodal imaging analysis of structural magnetic resonance combined with MEG in NDPH, a rare headache disease. We found that patients with NDPH had abnormalities of brain structure and cortical activity. The main findings of this study included: (1) Compared to HCs, the NDPH group had significantly decreased cortical thickness of the left rostral middle frontal gyrus, the decreased cortical surface area of the left fusiform gyrus, decreased GM volume of the left middle and superior frontal gyrus, and increased GM volume of left calcarine; (2) As expected, our study showed significant difference in theta, alpha, gamma and ripple bands power between patients with NDPH and HCs. Notably, our study found that the median time to onset of NDPH was 17 years and the minimum age of onset was 11 years. This age of onset was smaller than that reported in previous literatures, but considering that the population in this study was mainly Asian and the case number of previous studies was small, the results of this study were a good supplement to the epidemiology of NDPH [21, 22]. Our Results provide insights into the brain mechanisms that might be related to NDPH and open new avenues for biomarker and personalized treatment research.

Brain morphological signature of NDPH

In this study, VBM/SBM analysis showed multiple brain morphological changes in patients with NDPH. In contrast to a previous comprehensive VBM/SBM analysis study on patients with NDPH [8], we reported decreased cortical thickness and GM volume in the left frontal lobe, and similar results were reported in a previous NDPH sMRI study [10]. The frontal lobe involves pain regulation, cognitive control, and executive function [23, 24]. Decreased cortical thickness of the middle frontal in patients with NDPH implies increased pain sensitivity and leads to persistent pain. In a function neuroimaging study on chronic inflammatory pain, patients have a significantly negative correlation between the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex activity and pain sensitivity [25]. NDPH can be characterized by migraine-like headaches, and sometimes it is difficult to distinguish between the two disorders. Elevated levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α are commonly observed in patients with migraine [26]. Although the etiology of NDPH is not fully understood, previous clinical evidence suggested that infection and inflammation may be important predisposing factors for NDPH [27]. Interestingly, decreased cortical thickness of the middle frontal gyrus was associated with increased pain intensity and poorer quality of sleep [28]. The middle frontal gyrus is involved in forming slow waves, the major electrophysiological features of non-rapid eye movement [29]. During slow-wave sleep, dopamine metabolism in the striatum and the thalamus are reduced, reducing pain sensitivity [30]. This would explain the correlation between cortical thickness of the middle frontal gyrus and sleep quality [31]. Decreased GM volume of the middle frontal gyrus and superior frontal gyrus, especially on the left side, is common in adults and children with repeated and prolonged exposure to pain. In a VBM study of migraine, there was also a decrease of GM volume in the superfrontal and middle frontal gyrus in the migraine group [32]. The superior frontal and middle frontal gyrus are involved in integrating and processing pain signals. Taken in isolation, they are also related to executive function and correlated with the patient's quality of life [33].

In addition, we identified the decreased cortical surface area of the fusiform gyrus in patients, which was associated with body and facial recognition [34]. Bonanno et al. recently confirmed that patients with migraine without aura had decreased GM volume in bilateral fusiform gyrus [35]. A fMRI study also reported that abnormal fusiform gyrus activity was negatively correlated to the subject's pain intensity [36, 37]. In clinical scale analysis, a decrease in the surface area of the fusiform gyrus correlates with the degree of depression. We suspected hyperconnectivity between the fusiform gyrus, the left amygdalostriatal transition area, and the basolateral amygdala. Structural changes in the fusiform gyrus may cause amygdala subregional network dysfunction, leading to different subtypes of mood disorders [38].

We found that 39.28% of NDPH group had photophobia symptoms and their GM volume of calcarine increased. The brain perfusion of occipital in patients with NDPH was altered in our previous study, and we suggested that patients with NDPH may have abnormal activation of the visual system [39, 40]. This is not surprising given the visual pathway's established role in nociceptive pathways. Changes in the visual cortex had also been observed in other headache disorders. There was increased cortex thickness of visual cortex in patients with migraine with aura and might be involved in increased density of neurons [41, 42].

The resting state cortical oscillation of patients with NDPH

Neural oscillation is crucial for understanding pain. It plays an important role in integrating and separating activity in different brain regions, which is essential for brain function, including pain. Since Dr. Berger used a galvanometer to observe changes in voltage in human skulls, brain activity in different frequency bands have been gradually recognized [43, 44]. Studies of neural oscillations associated with pain have identified several key bands, particularly the theta, beta and gamma bands were associated with nociceptive processes.

Our data supported that the theta band power of the bilateral frontal lobe was significantly increased in patients with NDPH. Theta oscillations originating in the hippocampus are associated with work memory, episodic memory, and pain. Abnormal theta oscillation in the sensorimotor cortex has been shown to cause increased pain sensitivity in animal experiments [45,46,47]. In patients with fibromyalgia, abnormal theta band power may be associated with dysfunction of sensory processing in chronic pain [48].

We observed increased alpha band power in the left frontal lobe in patients. Abnormal alpha band power is also shown in many chronic pain diseases, and it has also been associated with pain experience [49]. Recent evidence had suggested that alpha band power and peak alpha frequency are associated with pain perception [50]. The MEG/EEG analysis of patients with neuropathic pain found that the neural oscillations were generally abnormal, and the abnormal brain regions were mainly concentrated in the ascending nociceptive pathway, default mode network and salience network [51, 52].

We observed increased gamma band power in the right frontal lobe and right temporal lobe in patients with NDPH. Our results were similar to a previous study which found a significant increase in gamma oscillatory power in frontal and temporal regions in patients with migraine [53]. Gamma oscillations are generated in neuronal networks involving excitatory pyramidal cells and inhibitory gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA)-energic interneurons. Zhou et al. found that increased activity of gamma oscillation in the prefrontal cortex and cerebellar may be a characteristic marker in patients with chronic neuropathic pain [54]. Because the increased gamma band power was associated with an increased pain sensitivity, our findings may provide evidence of pain chronicity in patients with NDPH [55].

Finally, our study showed that the ripple band power of the whole brain, bilateral frontal, and right temporal lobe of patients with NDPH was significantly increased. Physiological ripple oscillations are involved in the memory consolidation process. Ripple oscillations have also been observed in patients with epilepsy and brain tumors [56]. The ripple oscillations in the hippocampus can be consistent with previous experiences. Interestingly, we also observed that patients with NDPH could still clearly recall their first onset years later [57]. Compared with HCs, we found that the distribution of cortical neural activity of patients with NDPH altered in the ripple band by the source-level analysis. This change suggested the presence of whole-brain dysfunction in patients of NDPH.

Study limitations and future directions

This is the first study that combined sMRI and MEG to explore characteristics of brain structure, resting-state neural oscillation in patients with NDPH. Here we note some limitations in this study. The sample size was relatively small, and our preliminary results need to be verified with more data. Another limitation of this study was the lack of clinical scale information of HC group and a few patients of NDPH. We only analyzed resting-state MEG data, future studies could focus on changes in brain function in patients with NDPH while conducting cognitive tasks to further assess abnormalities in pain regulation circuits.

Conclusion

Our study expands the research on the brain structure and function related to NDPH. This study showed that patients with NDPH have changes in brain morphology such as cortical surface area, cortical thickness, and GM volume, accompanied by abnormal cortical neural activity. Brain structural changes in the frontotemporal cortex and abnormalities in cortical ripple activity may be involved in the pathogenesis of NDPH. These results provide new insights into the mechanisms of NDPH and may aid in the development of new treatment strategies.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

dSPM:

Dynamic statistical parametric mapping

FWE:

Family wise error

fMRI:

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

GAD-7:

Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7

GLM:

General linear model

GM:

Grey matter

GABA:

Gamma aminobutyric acid

HCs:

Healthy controls

HIT-6:

Headache Impact Test-6

HPI:

Headache position indicator

ICA:

Independent component analysis

MEG:

Magnetoencephalography

MNI:

Montreal Neurological Institute

PHQ-9:

Patient Health Questionnaire-9

PSQI:

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

SARS-CoV2:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

SBM:

Source-based morphometry

sMRI:

Structural magnetic resonance imaging

TIV:

Total intracranial volume

VBM:

Voxel-based morphometry

VAS:

Visual Analogue Scale

References

  1. Vanast W (1986) New daily persistent headache: definition of a benign syndrome. Headache 26:317

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grande RB, Aaseth K, Lundqvist C, Russell MB. Prevalence of new daily persistent headache in the general population. The Akershus study of chronic headache. Cephalalgia. 2009;29(11):1149–55.

  3. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1).

  4. Goadsby PJ (2011) New daily persistent headache: a syndrome, not a discrete disorder. Headache 51(4):650–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li D, Rozen TD (2002) The clinical characteristics of new daily persistent headache. Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache 22(1):66–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wöber-Bingöl C, Wöber C, Prayer D et al (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging for recurrent headache in childhood and adolescence. Headache 36(2):83–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Szabo E, Chang Y-HC, Shulman J, et al. Alterations in the structure and function of the brain in adolescents with new daily persistent headache: A pilot MRI study. Headache. 2022;62(7):858–69.

  8. Naegel S, Zeller J, Hougard A et al (2022) No structural brain alterations in new daily persistent headache - a cross sectional VBM/SBM study. Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache 42(4–5):335–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rozen TD (2016) New daily persistent headache: A lack of an association with white matter abnormalities on neuroimaging. Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache 36(10):987–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Szabo E, Chang YC, Shulman J et al (2022) Alterations in the structure and function of the brain in adolescents with new daily persistent headache: A pilot MRI study. Headache 62(7):858–869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Singh SP (2014) Magnetoencephalography: basic principles. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 17(Suppl 1):S107

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sejnowski TJ, Churchland PS, Movshon JA (2014) Putting big data to good use in neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 17(11):1440–1441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kosinski M, Bayliss M, Bjorner J et al (2003) A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: The HIT-6™. Qual Life Res 12:963–974

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB (2001) The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 16(9):606–613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B (2006) A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 166(10):1092–1097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF III, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ (1989) The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 28(2):193–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Langley G, Sheppeard H (1985) The visual analogue scale: its use in pain measurement. Rheumatol Int 5(4):145–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dale AM, Liu AK, Fischl BR et al (2000) Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron 26(1):55–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dale AM, Sereno MI (1993) Improved localizadon of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J Cogn Neurosci 5(2):162–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang WS, Nakajima M, Ochi A, et al. Detection of epileptogenic focus using advanced dynamic statistical parametric mapping with magnetoencephalography in a patient with MRI-negative focal cortical dysplasia type IIB. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2019:1–5.

  21. Rozen TD (2016) Triggering Events and New Daily Persistent Headache: Age and Gender Differences and Insights on Pathogenesis-A Clinic-Based Study. Headache 56(1):164–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Uniyal R, Paliwal VK, Tripathi A (2017) Psychiatric comorbidity in new daily persistent headache: A cross-sectional study. Eur J Pain 21(6):1031–1038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cieslik EC, Zilles K, Caspers S, et al. Is there "one" DLPFC in cognitive action control? Evidence for heterogeneity from co-activation-based parcellation. Cerebral cortex (New York, NY : 1991). 2013;23(11):2677–89.

  24. Seminowicz DA, Moayedi M (2017) The Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Acute and Chronic Pain. J Pain 18(9):1027–1035

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Karshikoff B, Jensen KB, Kosek E et al (2016) Why sickness hurts: A central mechanism for pain induced by peripheral inflammation. Brain Behav Immun 57:38–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Musubire AK, Cheema S, Ray JC, Hutton EJ, Matharu M (2023) Cytokines in primary headache disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Headache Pain 24(1):36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Evans RW, Turner DP (2021) Clinical features of new daily persistent headache: A retrospective chart review of 328 cases. Headache 61(10):1529–1538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shen C, Luo Q, Chamberlain SR et al (2020) What Is the Link Between Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Sleep Disturbance? A Multimodal Examination of Longitudinal Relationships and Brain Structure Using Large-Scale Population-Based Cohorts. Biol Psychiat 88(6):459–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Murphy M, Riedner BA, Huber R, Massimini M, Ferrarelli F, Tononi G (2009) Source modeling sleep slow waves. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(5):1608–1613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Thompson T, Gallop K, Correll CU et al (2017) Pain perception in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Ageing Res Rev 35:74–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Martin LE, Pollack L, McCune A, Schulte E, Savage CR, Lundgren JD (2015) Comparison of obese adults with poor versus good sleep quality during a functional neuroimaging delay discounting task: A pilot study. Psychiatry Res 234(1):90–95

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen WT, Chou KH, Lee PL et al (2018) Comparison of gray matter volume between migraine and “strict-criteria” tension-type headache. J Headache Pain 19(1):4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang S, Li H, Xu Q et al (2021) Regional homogeneity alterations in multi-frequency bands in tension-type headache: a resting-state fMRI study. J Headache Pain 22(1):129

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Peelen MV, Downing PE (2005) Within-subject reproducibility of category-specific visual activation with functional MRI. Hum Brain Mapp 25(4):402–408

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Bonanno L, Lo Buono V, De Salvo S et al (2020) Brain morphologic abnormalities in migraine patients: an observational study. J Headache Pain 21(1):39

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Parise M, Kubo TT, Doring TM, Tukamoto G, Vincent M, Gasparetto EL (2014) Cuneus and fusiform cortices thickness is reduced in trigeminal neuralgia. J Headache Pain 15(1):17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ter Minassian A, Ricalens E, Humbert S, Duc F, Aubé C, Beydon L (2013) Dissociating anticipation from perception: Acute pain activates default mode network. Hum Brain Mapp 34(9):2228–2243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tang S, Li H, Lu L et al (2019) Anomalous functional connectivity of amygdala subregional networks in major depressive disorder. Depress Anxiety 36(8):712–722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang X, Wang W, Bai X et al (2023) Alterations in regional homogeneity and multiple frequency amplitudes of low-frequency fluctuation in patients with new daily persistent headache: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Headache Pain 24(1):14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Bai X, Wang W, Zhang X et al (2022) Cerebral perfusion variance in new daily persistent headache and chronic migraine: an arterial spin-labeled MR imaging study. J Headache Pain 23(1):156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Noseda R, Kainz V, Jakubowski M et al (2010) A neural mechanism for exacerbation of headache by light. Nat Neurosci 13(2):239–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Gaist D, Hougaard A, Garde E et al (2018) Migraine with visual aura associated with thicker visual cortex. Brain : a journal of neurology 141(3):776–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Berger H (1934) Über das elektrenkephalogramm des menschen. DMW-Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 60(51):1947–1949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Buzsaki G (2004) Draguhn A. Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks science 304(5679):1926–1929

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Goyal A, Miller J, Qasim SE et al (2020) Functionally distinct high and low theta oscillations in the human hippocampus. Nat Commun 11(1):2469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Solomon EA, Stein JM, Das S, et al. Dynamic theta networks in the human medial temporal lobe support episodic memory. Curr Biol. 2019;29(7):1100–11. e1104.

  47. Fu B, Wen S-n, Wang B, Wang K, Zhang J-y, Liu S-j. Acute and chronic pain affects local field potential of the medial prefrontal cortex in different band neural oscillations. Mol Pain. 2018;14:1744806918785686.

  48. Choe MK, Lim M, Kim JS, Lee DS, Chung CK (2018) Disrupted Resting State Network of Fibromyalgia in Theta frequency. Sci Rep 8(1):2064

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Prichep LS, Shah J, Merkin H, Hiesiger EM (2018) Exploration of the Pathophysiology of Chronic Pain Using Quantitative EEG Source Localization. Clin EEG Neurosci 49(2):103–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Furman AJ, Meeker TJ, Rietschel JC et al (2018) Cerebral peak alpha frequency predicts individual differences in pain sensitivity. Neuroimage 167:203–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kisler LB, Kim JA, Hemington KS, et al. Abnormal alpha band power in the dynamic pain connectome is a marker of chronic pain with a neuropathic component. NeuroImage: Clinical. 2020;26:102241.

  52. Kim JA, Bosma RL, Hemington KS et al (2019) Neuropathic pain and pain interference are linked to alpha-band slowing and reduced beta-band magnetoencephalography activity within the dynamic pain connectome in patients with multiple sclerosis. Pain 160(1):187–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Li F, Xiang J, Wu T, Zhu D, Shi J (2016) Abnormal resting-state brain activity in headache-free migraine patients: A magnetoencephalography study. Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 127(8):2855–2861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhou R, Wang J, Qi W et al (2018) Elevated Resting State Gamma Oscillatory Activities in Electroencephalogram of Patients With Post-herpetic Neuralgia. Front Neurosci 12:750

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Wang J, Wang J, Xing GG, Li X, Wan Y (2016) Enhanced Gamma Oscillatory Activity in Rats with Chronic Inflammatory Pain. Front Neurosci 10:489

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Kucewicz MT, Cimbalnik J, Matsumoto JY et al (2014) High frequency oscillations are associated with cognitive processing in human recognition memory. Brain : a journal of neurology 137(Pt 8):2231–2244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Mahr JB, Fischer B. Internally Triggered Experiences of Hedonic Valence in Nonhuman Animals: Cognitive and Welfare Considerations. Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science. 2022:17456916221120425.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the participants and medical staff involved in this study, and Dr. Bingjiang Lyu for helpful discussion.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers: 32170752, 91849104, and 31770800), and the National Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (grant number: Z200024).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Dong Qiu and Wei Wang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.119 South Fourth Ring West Road, Fengtai District, 100070, Beijing, China

    Dong Qiu, Wei Wang, Yanliang Mei, Hefei Tang, Ziyu Yuan, Peng Zhang, Yaqing Zhang, Xueying Yu & Yonggang Wang

  2. Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.119 South Fourth Ring West Road, Fengtai District, 100070, Beijing, China

    Chunqing Yang & Qun Wang

Authors
  1. Dong Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yanliang Mei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hefei Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ziyu Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Peng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yaqing Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xueying Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Chunqing Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Qun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yonggang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

QD, WW, and YGW supported the conception and design of this project. DQ, WW, YGW, QW, YLM, HFT, PZ, YZY, YQZ, XYY and CQY acquired data. DQ analyzed the data. ZYY and WW contributed to data quality control. QD produced the first draft. All authors contributed intellectual content to the revised manuscript and have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yonggang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Committee of Beijing Tiantan Hospital of Capital Medical University (KY2022-044), which was registered on the https://www.clinicaltrials.gov (unique identifier: NCT05334927). All participants provided informed written consent according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

All authors consent for the publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

The power spectral density of each frequency band. HCs, healthy controls; NDPH, new daily persistent headache; All, all brain regions; L_F, left frontal lobe; R_F, right frontal lobe; L_P, left parietal lobe; R_P, right parietal lobe; L_O, left occipital lobe; R_O, right occipital lobe; L_T, left temporal lobe; R_T, right temporal lobe.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

The number of NDPH and HCs in different neuromagnetic activity areas. HCs, healthy controls; NDPH, new daily persistent headache; All, all brain regions; L_F, left frontal lobe; R_F, right frontal lobe; L_P, left parietal lobe; R_P, right parietal lobe; L_O, left occipital lobe; R_O, right occipital lobe; L_T, left temporal lobe; R_T, right temporal lobe; *, p<0.05.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiu, D., Wang, W., Mei, Y. et al. Brain structure and cortical activity changes of new daily persistent headache: multimodal evidence from MEG/sMRI. J Headache Pain 24, 45 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01581-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01581-6

Keywords

The Journal of Headache and Pain

ISSN: 1129-2377

Contact us