Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Review article
  • Open Access

PACAP and its role in primary headaches

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 2, 3
The Journal of Headache and PainOfficial Journal of the "European Headache Federation" and of "Lifting The Burden - The Global Campaign against Headache"201819:21

https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0852-4

©  The Author(s). 2018

  • Received: 6 November 2017
  • Accepted: 28 February 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) is a neuropeptide implicated in a wide range of functions, such as nociception and in primary headaches. Regarding its localization, PACAP has been observed in the sensory trigeminal ganglion (TG), in the parasympathetic sphenopalatine (SPG) and otic ganglia (OTG), and in the brainstem trigeminocervical complex. Immunohistochemistry has shown PACAP-38 in numerous cell bodies of SPG/OTG, co-stored with vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and, to a minor degree, with choline acetyltransferase. PACAP has in addition been found in a subpopulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-immunoreactive cells in the trigeminal system. The PACAP/VIP receptors (PAC1, VPAC1, and VPAC2) are present in sensory neurons and in vascular smooth muscle related to the trigeminovascular system. It is postulated that PACAP is involved in nociception. In support, abolishment of PACAP synthesis or reception leads to diminished pain responses, whereas systemic PACAP-38 infusion triggers pain behavior in animals and delayed migraine-like attacks in migraine patients without marked vasodilatory effects. In addition, increased plasma levels have been documented in acute migraine attacks and in cluster headache, in accordance with findings in experimental models of trigeminal activation. This suggest that the activation of the trigeminal system may result in elevated venous levels of PACAP, a change that can be reduced when headache is treated. The data presented in this review indicate that PACAP and its receptors may be promising targets for migraine therapeutics.

Keywords

  • PACAP
  • CGRP
  • Receptors
  • Migraine
  • Cluster headache

Background

The field of PACAP and its receptor PAC1 is currently very topical in the migraine field. Here we have provided an overview of available data bases; we used PubMed, Medline and Google Schoolar as sources. We report that PACAP is released in conjunction of migraine and cluster headache attacks. The most likely source of PACAP contributing to this elevation in cranial outflow resides in the trigeminovascular system (TVS) and the parasympathetic otic and sphenopalatine ganglia. The PAC1 receptor is less well described in the TVS, but found in the trigeminal and sphenopalatine ganglia. It is hypothesized that this may be a second neuropeptide system that might be useful to block in acute attacks.

Introduction

Migraine is thought to involve a primary dysregulation of sensory processing in the central nervous system (CNS) as a starting point of migraine [1]. It is thought that the origin of the disease rests in the hypothalamus – thalamus system, coupling to the brainstem. The central involvement is reflected early in many patients experiencing tactile allodynia and other neurological symptoms that affect the senses, including sensitivity to light, sound, and smell. These are thought to be consequences of central sensitization within the trigemino-thalamic pathway. The trigeminovascular system is involved with all its parts; the trigeminal nerve, the cranial vasculature, and nuclei within the brainstem/spinal cord.

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) are members of the VIP/secretin/growth hormone-releasing hormone/glucagon neuropeptide superfamily, widely expressed in vertebrate tissues [2–6]. VIP was first described by Victor Mutt during the early 1970s [7]. It was isolated from pig intestine and is localized to most organs and tissues in the body. During the following years, the other members of the family were described and characterized, including peptide histidine isoleucine/methionine (PHI/PHM), secretin, and PACAP [3, 8, 9]. The PACAP neuropeptide was discovered nearly 30 years ago based on its ability to enhance adenylate cyclase activity in rat pituitary cells, and was first isolated from ovine hypothalamic extracts [10]. Numerous studies on the localization/distribution/release of this group of neuropeptides from different tissues and involvement in diseases have been presented [11, 12]. The aim of this review is to focus on sensory aspects of PACAP and primary headaches, with special emphasis on migraine.

General features and localization of PACAP within the CNS

There are two forms of PACAP (− 27 and − 38), with both isoforms sharing functional and structural homologies with VIP [10] and being able to bind to G-protein-coupled receptors specific (PAC1) and less specific (VPAC1 and VPAC2; with comparable affinity to VIP, PACAP-27, and PACAP-38) to PACAP [3, 13, 14]. Recently, however, the functional presence of yet unidentified PACAP receptors have been proposed based on experimental results using selective modulators [15].

PACAP is a pleiotropic peptide that can be found in several exocrine and endocrine tissues, in the respiratory, intestinal, urinary, and reproductive systems, as well as in the central and peripheral nervous systems [16–23]. In neuronal tissues, the isoform PACAP-38 predominates. It is known to play hypophysiotropic, neuromodulatory, and neurotransmitter roles, and has been associated with differentiation- and proliferation-inducing effects in the developing nervous system, as well as with cytoprotective, anti-apoptotic, and anti-inflammatory features within various target organs [24–34]. Furthermore, PACAP has been shown to be a potent local and systemic vasodilator administered in a wide concentration range, associating with biphasic paradoxical hypertensive effects in very large doses [35–37].

Immunohistochemical evidence confirms the presence of PACAP in anatomical structures relevant to the pathogenesis of primary headaches including migraine, such as in the trigeminocervical system, including nerve fibers in the dura mater, the cerebral vessels [38], the facial skin [39], the trigeminal ganglion (TG) [15, 39–44], the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC) [15, 16, 45], the Rexed 1 and 2 laminae at the C1-C2 levels of the cervical spinal cord [45] and in various brainstem nuclei within the ‘migraine generator area’ [16, 46, 47] as well as in the parasympathetic sphenopalatine (SPG) and otic ganglia (OTG) [40, 41, 48–50]. Recent works have revealed that PACAP is localized in small neurons in the dorsal root ganglia and the TG which in addition store calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) [44]. Interestingly PACAP mRNA-labeled neurons constituted 10% of the total number of nerve cell bodies in the dorsal root ganglia, whereas the population of CGRP mRNA-labeled nerve cell bodies constituted 46% [51]. This agrees well with later in depth immunocytochemistry work on the TG [52] (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Immunohistochemical demonstration of distribution of PACAP and CGRP in the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) and the trigeminal ganglion (TG). The figures illustrates that in both ganglia there are cells storing the two neuropeptides and also being alone. The CGRP immunoreactivity occurs more frequent in the TG than does PACAP-ir. Arrows show CGRP positive and PACAP negative cells, while arrow heads show co-localization (above) or negative (below). There are also fibers positive to CGRP. In the SPG the arrow shows a single CGRP positive cell that co-localize PACAP while numerous cells are positive to PACAP only (arrow head). In the right hand SPG illustration  there are several CGRP positive fibers

In line with the above, early studies revealed the presence of specific PACAP-binding sites in relevant regions of the rat and human CNS [53, 54]. In addition, subsequent immunohistochemical and biochemical evidence demonstrated the presence of PAC 1 and VPAC 2 receptors in the rat TG [55]. Of note, there exist some discordant results, functional [56] and biochemical data on the mRNA level suggest that VPAC 1 receptors are not present in the TG of rats [55]. However, mRNA for all three types of VIP/PACAP receptors have been reported to occur in human and rat TG [57], and this is supported by another study in rat TG and TNC [15]. Moreover, protein expression has been shown by immunohistochemistry for all three types of PACAP receptors in both the human and rat SPG [49]. The evidence suggest a special role in terms of disease pathogenesis among relevant neuropeptides. The detailed histochemistry revealed that while VIP/PACAP are both seen in the parasympathetic ganglia (SPG/OTG), only PACAP has been found in the trigeminal system [42].

Early findings of neuropeptide release in primary headaches

The role of PACAP and VIP is under discussion because (i) they appear jointly in most of the SPG/OTG neurons and (ii) PACAP co-localizes with CGRP only in a small fraction of neurons within the TG in the small to medium sized neurons. Early studies showed that in migraine VIP was only released in a subpopulation of patients that had facial symptoms such as nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, and scleral injection in addition to headache (probably due to the activation of the parasympathetic system). Importantly, all cluster headache subjects showed both facial symptoms and VIP release [58]; however, at that time, the methodology to measure PACAP was not available. We suggested that this was due to activation of the parasympathetic system. Experimental studies in cats [59] revealed that the activation of the trigeminal system may in addition involve the parasympathetic system, as denervation of the trigeminal nerve aborted the activation of SPG, interpreted either as a direct or indirect coupling between these two systems.

Involvement of PACAP in migraine

Conclusions from the studies with PACAP infusion and knockouts

Human provocation studies of migraine using systemic administration of different molecules have generated important insights into the possible mechanisms in primary headache diseases. CGRP, VIP, and PACAP-38 are all strong vasodilators, sharing the activation of adenylate cyclase. The first direct evidence that highlighted the potential significance of PACAP in the pathophysiology of migraine came from observations made in a human study [60] where intravenous administration of PACAP-38 caused headache and vasodilation in healthy subjects as well as in migraineurs, and lead to delayed-type migraine-like attacks exclusively in migraine patients without aura (65–75%), a feature remarkably similar to that previously reported after nitroglycerin infusion [61, 62]. Because VIP had no such effect, it was suggested that this might be secondary to the activation of the PAC1 receptor, which is now under study in a clinical trial. For comparison, CGRP induces delayed migraine-like attacks in 65% of migraine patients, but not in normal subjects [63]. Today numerous CGRP active agents are on the verge of going to the market as effective therapy both for acute treatment and as prophylaxis.

In support of the above, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) angiographic study revealed that PACAP-38-induced headache was associated with significant dilation of the extracranial part of the middle meningeal arteries (MMAs), but not of the middle cerebral arteries (MCAs). This effect preceded the onset of migraine-like headache and was sensitive to the administration of a triptan class of drug [64]. A subsequent MRI angiographic human study demonstrated a remarkable and sustained vasodilation of extracranial but not intracranial arteries (including the MCAs) following PACAP-38 administration [65]. In addition to these, intravenous PACAP-38-induced migraine-like attacks have been found associated with alterations in brain network connectivity, by means of a resting-state functional MRI study [66]. The role of VIP in PACAP-induced vasodilation is unclear, as data regarding its levels after PACAP administration are contradictory [65, 67], and its vasodilation is less long-lasting than that of PACAP [65]. The migraine response to PACAP-38 has not been found to be influenced by the presence of the risk allele MEF2D [67, 68].

Experimental studies support the relevance of PACAP in sensory functions as well as in pain disorders, including primary headaches. Neurograms obtained following stimulation of the ipsilateral peroneal or sciatic nerve suggested that intrathecal PACAP may act as a neurotransmitter or modulator in sensory C-fibers, possibly with a contribution of A-fibers [69]. Interestingly, PACAP-27 was more potent than PACAP-38 or VIP at this function. On the other hand, the direct intrathecal administration of PACAP elicited a dose-dependent decrease in the tail-flick latency, whereas higher doses resulted in biting and scratching; these behaviors were interpreted as pain-like syndrome and supported a role of PACAP as a sensory neurotransmitter involved in nociception [70]. Intrathecal administration of PACAP(6–38), a PAC1 receptor antagonist reduced mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia, suggesting that these receptors are important for PACAP-induced pain [71]. The role of PAC1 receptor in pain sensation has also been supported by studies using PAC1 knockout mice, as these animals showed reduced chronic responses to chemical, mechanical, and thermal stimuli [72, 73]. Similar results were obtained with PACAP-knockout mice, presenting with diminished light-aversive behavior (i.e., photophobia), decreased c-fos expression in the TNC and TG, and reduced meningeal blood flow following nitroglycerin administration compared to wild-type controls [74].

PACAP has also been implicated in higher order processing of pain in brain regions such as thalamus and amygdala [75, 76], relevant in the central sensitization and emotional load of pain. Intracerebroventricularly applied PAC 1 receptor inhibitor decreased the delayed activation and sensitization of second-order nociceptive neurons within the trigeminocervical complex following dural stimulation [77]. This supports a potential role of PACAP in the development of central sensitization of pain in migraine. There are experimental results suggesting the role of PACAP in the development of peripheral sensitization as well in certain models of pain [78]. The data on the possible role of PACAP and its receptors in migraine pathogenesis by means of modulating neurogenic inflammation [73, 79–81] and mast cell degranulation [65, 82–86] are, however, conflicting.

PACAP as a biomarker in primary headaches

A support for a sensory role of PACAP in nociception came from experiments with capsaicin administration in vivo in rats [26], as it resulted in elevated cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of PACAP-27 by 177%, PACAP-38 by 93%, and CGRP by 692% [87]. Studies on animal models of trigeminal activation confirm the potential role of PACAP in the pathogenesis of migraine in particular, as immunoreactivity of both PACAP-27 and PACAP-38 were found elevated in the TNC of rats following electrical stimulation (at the TG) or chemical stimulation (by nitroglycerin) of the trigeminovascular system [88]. Furthermore, PACAP-38 levels were found elevated in the blood plasma of rats after electrical stimulation of the TG [88]. Likewise, elevated levels of PACAP were measured in the external jugular vein samples of cats following electrical stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus [89]. In fact, stimulation of the trigeminal system directly showed the release of not only PACAP but also VIP and CGRP into the external jugular venous blood [89, 90].

Human clinical studies provide concordant data, as of note, elevated levels of plasma PACAP-38 were revealed in the ictal period of migraineurs (i.e., during a spontaneous migraine attack) compared to the interictal phase [89, 91]. Interestingly, supportive data were reported in episodic cluster headache patients as well [92]. The interictal plasma PACAP concentrations of migraineurs were, however, significantly lower compared to the levels measured in healthy controls or in patients with tension-type headache [89, 91, 93].

Concluding remarks

The exact role of PACAP in primary headaches is still unknown but it is clearly present in many different parts of the CNS including several regions of interest in the discussions of migraine pathophysiology. Current evidence suggest that PACAP plays essential roles in the pathogenesis of migraine via modulating the function of nociceptive neurons within the trigeminocervical system.

The position of PACAP in migraine rests on the following main observations: (i) PACAP levels are increased in the circulation of cats and rats upon stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus [89, 94], and the TG, respectively [88]. (ii) PACAP levels in the external jugular vein are reduced with amelioration of migraine headache when subjects were treated with sumatriptan, and lower levels of PACAP occur between attacks when compared with attacks [89]. (iii) Systemic infusion of PACAP-38 in migraine patients results in migraine-like headache [60]. (iv) The plasma levels of PACAP-38 are altered in ictal and interictal periods of migraine patients [91]. The unanswered questions that remain are related to the origin of endogenous PACAP and the mechanism through which systemic PACAP can induce migraine. Though Banks suggests that PACAP has actions in the CNS and provides evidence in support [95], the available data strongly indicate that PACAP does not pass the wall of cerebral arteries, as studied in isolated perfused MCAs [96], which agrees with the view that the peptide is a large molecule that does not pass the blood-brain barrier (BBB) [96, 97]. Therefore, as suggested also for CGRP, the relevant target of systemically administered PACAP could very well be effects on sites located outside the BBB, such as the TG and other ganglia as well as the dura mater; however, this is still not settled, and the role of the BBB needs to be clarified.

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    The concordant experimental and clinical data show that PACAP and its receptors may have a role in the pathogenesis of primary headaches, especially migraine and cluster headache.

     
  2. 2.

    The relation with other neuronal messenger molecules deserves future study.

     
  3. 3.

    Collectively the current understanding of PACAP and its receptors in relation intracranial structures and brain provide valuable information as potential targets of effective future therapeutics.

     

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council (grant no 5958), the Heart-Lund Foundation, and the projects EUROHEADPAINFP7-Health 2013-Innovation; Grant No. 602633; GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00034, KTIA_NAP_13-2014-0022, GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00048, the MTA-SZTE Neuroscience Research Group.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Competing interests

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 221 84 Lund, Sweden
(2)
Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Center, University of Szeged, Semmelweis u. 6, Szeged, H-6725, Hungary
(3)
MTA-SZTE Neuroscience Research Group, University of Szeged, Semmelweis u. 6, Szeged, H-6725, Hungary

References

  1. Schulte LH, May A (2016) The migraine generator revisited: continuous scanning of the migraine cycle over 30 days and three spontaneous attacks. Brain 139:1987–1993View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arimura A (2007) PACAP: the road to discovery. Peptides 28:1617–1619View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Vaudry D, Falluel-Morel A, Bourgault S, Basille M, Burel D, Wurtz O, Fournier A, Chow BK, Hashimoto H, Galas L, Vaudry H (2009) Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide and its receptors: 20 years after the discovery. Pharmacol Rev 61:283–357View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexandre D, Anouar Y, Jegou S, Fournier A, Vaudry H (1999) A cloned frog vasoactive intestinal polypeptide/pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide receptor exhibits pharmacological and tissue distribution characteristics of both VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors in mammals. Endocrinology 140:1285–1293View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wong AO, Leung MY, Shea WL, Tse LY, Chang JP, Chow BK (1998) Hypophysiotropic action of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) in the goldfish: immunohistochemical demonstration of PACAP in the pituitary, PACAP stimulation of growth hormone release from pituitary cells, and molecular cloning of pituitary type I PACAP receptor. Endocrinology 139:3465–3479View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nowak JZ, Zawilska JB (2003) PACAP in avians: origin, occurrence, and receptors--pharmacological and functional considerations. Curr Pharm Des 9:467–481View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mutt V, Said SI (1974) Structure of the porcine vasoactive intestinal octacosapeptide. The amino-acid sequence. Use of kallikrein in its determination. Eur J Biochem 42:581–589View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bataille D, Gespach C, Laburthe M, Amiranoff B, Tatemoto K, Vauclin N, Mutt V, Rosselin G (1980) Porcine peptide having N-terminal histidine and C-terminal isoleucine amide (PHI): vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and secretin-like effects in different tissues from the rat. FEBS Lett 114:240–242View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhou ZC, Gardner JD, Jensen RT (1989) Interaction of peptides related to VIP and secretin with Guinea pig pancreatic acini. Am J Phys 256:G283–G290Google Scholar
  10. Miyata A, Arimura A, Dahl RR, Minamino N, Uehara A, Jiang L, Culler MD, Coy DH (1989) Isolation of a novel 38 residue-hypothalamic polypeptide which stimulates adenylate cyclase in pituitary cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 164:567–574View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Uddman R, Malm L, Sundler F (1980) The origin of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) nerves in the feline nasal mucosa. Acta Otolaryngol 89:152–156View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Grunditz T, Hakanson R, Hedge G, Rerup C, Sundler F, Uddman R (1986) Peptide histidine isoleucine amide stimulates thyroid hormone secretion and coexists with vasoactive intestinal polypeptide in intrathyroid nerve fibers from laryngeal ganglia. Endocrinology 118:783–790View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Laburthe M, Couvineau A, Tan V (2007) Class II G protein-coupled receptors for VIP and PACAP: structure, models of activation and pharmacology. Peptides 28:1631–1639View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Schytz HW, Olesen J, Ashina M (2010) The PACAP receptor: a novel target for migraine treatment. Neurotherapeutics 7:191–196View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Jansen-Olesen I, Baun M, Amrutkar DV, Ramachandran R, Christophersen DV, Olesen J (2014) PACAP-38 but not VIP induces release of CGRP from trigeminal nucleus caudalis via a receptor distinct from the PAC1 receptor. Neuropeptides 48:53–64View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Palkovits M, Somogyvari-Vigh A, Arimura A (1995) Concentrations of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) in human brain nuclei. Brain Res 699:116–120View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Masuo Y, Ohtaki T, Masuda Y, Tsuda M, Fujino M (1992) Binding sites for pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP): comparison with vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) binding site localization in rat brain sections. Brain Res 575:113–123View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fahrenkrug J, Hannibal J (2011) Localisation of the neuropeptide PACAP and its receptors in the rat parathyroid and thyroid glands. Gen Comp Endocrinol 171:105–113View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Koves K, Kantor O, Scammell JG, Arimura A (1998) PACAP colocalizes with luteinizing and follicle-stimulating hormone immunoreactivities in the anterior lobe of the pituitary gland. Peptides 19:1069–1072View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Borzsei R, Mark L, Tamas A, Bagoly T, Bay C, Csanaky K, Banki E, Kiss P, Vaczy A, Horvath G, Nemeth J, Szauer E, Helyes Z, Reglodi D (2009) Presence of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide-38 in human plasma and milk. Eur J Endocrinol 160:561–565View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Moody TW, Ito T, Osefo N, Jensen RT (2011) VIP and PACAP: recent insights into their functions/roles in physiology and disease from molecular and genetic studies. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 18:61–67View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Barberi M, Muciaccia B, Morelli MB, Stefanini M, Cecconi S, Canipari R (2007) Expression localisation and functional activity of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and their receptors in mouse ovary. Reproduction 134:281–292View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Masuo Y, Tokito F, Matsumoto Y, Shimamoto N, Fujino M (1994) Ontogeny of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and its binding sites in the rat brain. Neurosci Lett 170:43–46View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Koves K, Arimura A, Somogyvari-Vigh A, Vigh S, Miller J (1990) Immunohistochemical demonstration of a novel hypothalamic peptide, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide, in the ovine hypothalamus. Endocrinology 127:264–271View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hashimoto H, Shintani N, Tanida M, Hayata A, Hashimoto R, Baba A (2011) PACAP is implicated in the stress axes. Curr Pharm Des 17:985–989View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Reglodi D, Kiss P, Lubics A, Tamas A (2011) Review on the protective effects of PACAP in models of neurodegenerative diseases in vitro and in vivo. Curr Pharm Des 17:962–972View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Seaborn T, Masmoudi-Kouli O, Fournier A, Vaudry H, Vaudry D (2011) Protective effects of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) against apoptosis. Curr Pharm Des 17:204–214View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ohtsuka M, Fukumitsu H, Furukawa S (2008) PACAP decides neuronal laminar fate via PKA signaling in the developing cerebral cortex. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 369:1144–1149View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Watanabe J, Nakamachi T, Matsuno R, Hayashi D, Nakamura M, Kikuyama S, Nakajo S, Shioda S (2007) Localization, characterization and function of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide during brain development. Peptides 28:1713–1719View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Reglodi D, Kiss P, Horvath G, Lubics A, Laszlo E, Tamas A, Racz B, Szakaly P (2012) Effects of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide in the urinary system, with special emphasis on its protective effects in the kidney. Neuropeptides 46:61–70View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferencz A, Weber G, Helyes Z, Hashimoto H, Baba A, Reglodi D (2010) Presence of endogenous PACAP-38 ameliorated intestinal cold preservation tissue injury. J Mol Neurosci 42:428–434View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Racz B, Reglodi D, Horvath G, Szigeti A, Balatonyi B, Roth E, Weber G, Alotti N, Toth G, Gasz B (2010) Protective effect of PACAP against doxorubicin-induced cell death in cardiomyocyte culture. J Mol Neurosci 42:419–427View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Elekes K, Sandor K, Moricz A, Kereskai L, Kemeny A, Szoke E, Perkecz A, Reglodi D, Hashimoto H, Pinter E, Szolcsanyi J, Helyes Z (2011) Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide plays an anti-inflammatory role in endotoxin-induced airway inflammation: in vivo study with gene-deleted mice. Peptides 32:1439–1446View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhou CJ, Shioda S, Yada T, Inagaki N, Pleasure SJ, Kikuyama S (2002) PACAP and its receptors exert pleiotropic effects in the nervous system by activating multiple signaling pathways. Curr Protein Pept Sci 3:423–439View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Warren JB, Cockcroft JR, Larkin SW, Kajekar R, Macrae A, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR (1992) Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide is a potent vasodilator in humans. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 20:83–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ishizuka Y, Kashimoto K, Mochizuki T, Sato K, Ohshima K, Yanaihara N (1992) Cardiovascular and respiratory actions of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptides. Regul Pept 40:29–39View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Naruse S, Suzuki T, Ozaki T, Nokihara K (1993) Vasodilator effect of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) on femoral blood flow in dogs. Peptides 14:505–510View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Eftekhari S, Warfvinge K, Blixt FW, Edvinsson L (2013) Differentiation of nerve fibers storing CGRP and CGRP receptors in the peripheral trigeminovascular system. J Pain 14:1289–1303View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Moller K, Zhang YZ, Hakanson R, Luts A, Sjolund B, Uddman R, Sundler F (1993) Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide is a sensory neuropeptide: immunocytochemical and immunochemical evidence. Neuroscience 57:725–732View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Baeres FM, Moller M (2004) Origin of PACAP-immunoreactive nerve fibers innervating the subarachnoidal blood vessels of the rat brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 24:628–635View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Nielsen HS, Hannibal J, Fahrenkrug J (1998) Embryonic expression of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide in sensory and autonomic ganglia and in spinal cord of the rat. J Comp Neurol 394:403–415View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Tajti J, Uddman R, Moller S, Sundler F, Edvinsson L (1999) Messenger molecules and receptor mRNA in the human trigeminal ganglion. J Auton Nerv Syst 76:176–183View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hou M, Uddman R, Tajti J, Edvinsson L (2003) Nociceptin immunoreactivity and receptor mRNA in the human trigeminal ganglion. Brain Res 964:179–186View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Eftekhari S, Salvatore CA, Johansson S, Chen TB, Zeng Z, Edvinsson L (2015) Localization of CGRP, CGRP receptor, PACAP and glutamate in trigeminal ganglion. Relation to the blood-brain barrier. Brain Res 1600:93–109View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Uddman R, Tajti J, Hou M, Sundler F, Edvinsson L (2002) Neuropeptide expression in the human trigeminal nucleus caudalis and in the cervical spinal cord C1 and C2. Cephalalgia 22:112–116View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Tajti J, Uddman R, Edvinsson L (2001) Neuropeptide localization in the "migraine generator" region of the human brainstem. Cephalalgia 21:96–101View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Legradi G, Shioda S, Arimura A (1994) Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-like immunoreactivity in autonomic regulatory areas of the rat medulla oblongata. Neurosci Lett 176:193–196View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Uddman R, Tajti J, Moller S, Sundler F, Edvinsson L (1999) Neuronal messengers and peptide receptors in the human sphenopalatine and otic ganglia. Brain Res 826:193–199View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Csati A, Tajti J, Kuris A, Tuka B, Edvinsson L, Warfvinge K (2012) Distribution of vasoactive intestinal peptide, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide, nitric oxide synthase, and their receptors in human and rat sphenopalatine ganglion. Neuroscience 202:158–168View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Steinberg A, Frederiksen SD, Blixt FW, Warfvinge K, Edvinsson L (2016) Expression of messenger molecules and receptors in rat and human sphenopalatine ganglion indicating therapeutic targets. J Headache Pain 17:78View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Mulder H, Uddman R, Moller K, Zhang YZ, Ekblad E, Alumets J, Sundler F (1994) Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide expression in sensory neurons. Neuroscience 63:307–312View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Edvinsson L, Uddman R (2005) Neurobiology in primary headaches. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 48:438–456View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Cauvin A, Robberecht P, De Neef P, Gourlet P, Vandermeers A, Vandermeers-Piret MC, Christophe J (1991) Properties and distribution of receptors for pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (PACAP) in rat brain and spinal cord. Regul Pept 35:161–173View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Suda K, Smith DM, Ghatei MA, Murphy JK, Bloom SR (1991) Investigation and characterization of receptors for pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide in human brain by radioligand binding and chemical cross-linking. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:958–964View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Chaudhary P, Baumann TK (2002) Expression of VPAC2 receptor and PAC1 receptor splice variants in the trigeminal ganglion of the adult rat. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 104:137–142View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Saghy E, Payrits M, Helyes Z, Reglodi D, Banki E, Toth G, Couvineau A, Szoke E (2015) Stimulatory effect of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide 6-38, M65 and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide 6-28 on trigeminal sensory neurons. Neuroscience 308:144–156View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Knutsson M, Edvinsson L (2002) Distribution of mRNA for VIP and PACAP receptors in human cerebral arteries and cranial ganglia. Neuroreport 13:507–509View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Goadsby PJ, Edvinsson L (1994) Human in vivo evidence for trigeminovascular activation in cluster headache. Neuropeptide changes and effects of acute attacks therapies. Brain 117(Pt 3):427–434View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Goadsby PJ, Edvinsson L (1994) Joint 1994 Wolff award presentation. Peripheral and central trigeminovascular activation in cat is blocked by the serotonin (5HT)-1D receptor agonist 311C90. Headache 34:394–399View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Schytz HW, Birk S, Wienecke T, Kruuse C, Olesen J, Ashina M (2009) PACAP38 induces migraine-like attacks in patients with migraine without aura. Brain 132:16–25View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Olesen J, Iversen HK, Thomsen LL (1993) Nitric oxide supersensitivity: a possible molecular mechanism of migraine pain. Neuroreport 4:1027–1030View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Sicuteri F, Del Bene E, Poggioni M, Bonazzi A (1987) Unmasking latent dysnociception in healthy subjects. Headache 27:180–185View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Lassen LH, Haderslev PA, Jacobsen VB, Iversen HK, Sperling B, Olesen J (2002) CGRP may play a causative role in migraine. Cephalalgia 22:54–61View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Amin FM, Asghar MS, Guo S, Hougaard A, Hansen AE, Schytz HW, van der Geest RJ, de Koning PJ, Larsson HB, Olesen J, Ashina M (2012) Headache and prolonged dilatation of the middle meningeal artery by PACAP38 in healthy volunteers. Cephalalgia 32:140–149View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Amin FM, Hougaard A, Schytz HW, Asghar MS, Lundholm E, Parvaiz AI, de Koning PJ, Andersen MR, Larsson HB, Fahrenkrug J, Olesen J, Ashina M (2014) Investigation of the pathophysiological mechanisms of migraine attacks induced by pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38. Brain 137:779–794View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Amin FM, Hougaard A, Magon S, Asghar MS, Ahmad NN, Rostrup E, Sprenger T, Ashina M (2016) Change in brain network connectivity during PACAP38-induced migraine attacks: a resting-state functional MRI study. Neurology 86:180–187View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Guo S, Vollesen AL, Hansen YB, Frandsen E, Andersen MR, Amin FM, Fahrenkrug J, Olesen J, Ashina M (2016) Part II: biochemical changes after pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 infusion in migraine patients. CephalalgiaGoogle Scholar
  68. Guo S, Vollesen AL, Hansen RD, Esserlind AL, Amin FM, Christensen AF, Olesen J, Ashina M (2016) Part I: pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 induced migraine-like attacks in patients with and without familial aggregation of migraine. CephalalgiaGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang YZ, Sjolund B, Moller K, Hakanson R, Sundler F (1993) Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide produces a marked and long-lasting depression of a C-fibre-evoked flexion reflex. Neuroscience 57:733–737View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Narita M, Dun SL, Dun NJ, Tseng LF (1996) Hyperalgesia induced by pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide in the mouse spinal cord. Eur J Pharmacol 311:121–126View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Davis-Taber R, Baker S, Lehto SG, Zhong C, Surowy CS, Faltynek CR, Scott VE, Honore P (2008) Central pituitary adenylate cyclase 1 receptors modulate nociceptive behaviors in both inflammatory and neuropathic pain states. J Pain 9:449–456View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Jongsma H, Pettersson LM, Zhang Y, Reimer MK, Kanje M, Waldenstrom A, Sundler F, Danielsen N (2001) Markedly reduced chronic nociceptive response in mice lacking the PAC1 receptor. Neuroreport 12:2215–2219View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Mabuchi T, Shintani N, Matsumura S, Okuda-Ashitaka E, Hashimoto H, Muratani T, Minami T, Baba A, Ito S (2004) Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide is required for the development of spinal sensitization and induction of neuropathic pain. J Neurosci 24:7283–7291View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Markovics A, Kormos V, Gaszner B, Lashgarara A, Szoke E, Sandor K, Szabadfi K, Tuka B, Tajti J, Szolcsanyi J, Pinter E, Hashimoto H, Kun J, Reglodi D, Helyes Z (2012) Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide plays a key role in nitroglycerol-induced trigeminovascular activation in mice. Neurobiol Dis 45:633–644View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Martin M, Otto C, Santamarta MT, Torrecilla M, Pineda J, Schutz G, Maldonado R (2003) Morphine withdrawal is modified in pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide type I-receptor-deficient mice. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 110:109–118View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Missig G, Roman CW, Vizzard MA, Braas KM, Hammack SE, May V (2014) Parabrachial nucleus (PBn) pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) signaling in the amygdala: implication for the sensory and behavioral effects of pain. Neuropharmacology 86:38–48View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Akerman S, Goadsby PJ (2015) Neuronal PAC1 receptors mediate delayed activation and sensitization of trigeminocervical neurons: relevance to migraine. Sci Transl Med 7:308ra157View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Sandor K, Bolcskei K, McDougall JJ, Schuelert N, Reglodi D, Elekes K, Petho G, Pinter E, Szolcsanyi J, Helyes Z (2009) Divergent peripheral effects of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 on nociception in rats and mice. Pain 141:143–150View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Helyes Z, Pozsgai G, Borzsei R, Nemeth J, Bagoly T, Mark L, Pinter E, Toth G, Elekes K, Szolcsanyi J, Reglodi D (2007) Inhibitory effect of PACAP-38 on acute neurogenic and non-neurogenic inflammatory processes in the rat. Peptides 28:1847–1855View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Nemeth J, Reglodi D, Pozsgai G, Szabo A, Elekes K, Pinter E, Szolcsanyi J, Helyes Z (2006) Effect of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide-38 on sensory neuropeptide release and neurogenic inflammation in rats and mice. Neuroscience 143:223–230View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Zhang Y, Malmberg AB, Sjolund B, Yaksh TL (1996) The effect of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (PACAP) on the nociceptive formalin test. Neurosci Lett 207:187–190View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Baun M, Pedersen MH, Olesen J, Jansen-Olesen I (2012) Dural mast cell degranulation is a putative mechanism for headache induced by PACAP-38. Cephalalgia 32:337–345View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Bhatt DK, Gupta S, Olesen J, Jansen-Olesen I (2014) PACAP-38 infusion causes sustained vasodilation of the middle meningeal artery in the rat: possible involvement of mast cells. Cephalalgia 34:877–886View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Mori T, Kawashima T, Beppu Y, Takagi K (1994) Histamine release induced by pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide from rat peritoneal mast cells. Arzneimittelforschung 44:1044–1046PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Odum L, Petersen LJ, Skov PS, Ebskov LB (1998) Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) is localized in human dermal neurons and causes histamine release from skin mast cells. Inflamm Res 47:488–492View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Schytz HW (2010) Investigation of carbachol and PACAP38 in a human model of migraine. Dan Med Bull 57:B4223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Zhang Y, Malmberg AB, Yaksh TL, Sjolund B, Sundler F, Hakanson R (1997) Capsaicin-evoked release of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (PACAP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) from rat spinal cord in vivo. Regul Pept 69:83–87View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Tuka B, Helyes Z, Markovics A, Bagoly T, Nemeth J, Mark L, Brubel R, Reglodi D, Pardutz A, Szolcsanyi J, Vecsei L, Tajti J (2012) Peripheral and central alterations of pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide-like immunoreactivity in the rat in response to activation of the trigeminovascular system. Peptides 33:307–316View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Zagami AS, Edvinsson L, Goadsby PJ (2014) Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide and migraine. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 1:1036–1040View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Zagami AS, Goadsby PJ, Edvinsson L (1990) Stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus in the cat causes release of vasoactive peptides. Neuropeptides 16:69–75View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Tuka B, Helyes Z, Markovics A, Bagoly T, Szolcsanyi J, Szabo N, Toth E, Kincses ZT, Vecsei L, Tajti J (2013) Alterations in PACAP-38-like immunoreactivity in the plasma during ictal and interictal periods of migraine patients. Cephalalgia 33:1085–1095View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Tuka B, Szabo N, Toth E, Kincses ZT, Pardutz A, Szok D, Kortesi T, Bagoly T, Helyes Z, Edvinsson L, Vecsei L, Tajti J (2016) Release of PACAP-38 in episodic cluster headache patients - an exploratory study. J Headache Pain 17:69View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  93. Han X, Dong Z, Hou L, Wan D, Chen M, Tang W, Yu S (2015) Interictal plasma pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide levels are decreased in migraineurs but remain unchanged in patients with tension-type headache. Clin Chim Acta 450:151–154View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Zagami AS, Edvinsson L, Hoskin KL, Goadsby PJ (1995) Stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus causes extracranial release of PACAP. Cephalalgia 15(Suppl 14):109Google Scholar
  95. Reglodi D, Tamas A (2016) Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase activating polypeptide — PACAP. Cham. Springer International PublishingGoogle Scholar
  96. Erdling A, Sheykhzade M, Maddahi A, Bari F, Edvinsson L (2013) VIP/PACAP receptors in cerebral arteries of rat: characterization, localization and relation to intracellular calcium. Neuropeptides 47:85–92View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Syed AU, Koide M, Braas KM, May V, Wellman GC (2012) Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) potently dilates middle meningeal arteries: implications for migraine. J Mol Neurosci 48:574–583View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement

The Journal of Headache and Pain

ISSN: 1129-2377

Contact us