Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Impaired intrinsic functional connectivity between the thalamus and visual cortex in migraine without aura

Abstract

Background

Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has confirmed disrupted visual network connectivity in migraine without aura (MwoA). The thalamus plays a pivotal role in a number of pain conditions, including migraine. However, the significance of altered thalamo-visual functional connectivity (FC) in migraine remains unknown. The goal of this study was to explore thalamo-visual FC integrity in patients with MwoA and investigate its clinical significance.

Methods

Resting-state fMRI data were acquired from 33 patients with MwoA and 22 well-matched healthy controls. After identifying the visual network by independent component analysis, we compared neural activation in the visual network and thalamo-visual FC and assessed whether these changes were linked to clinical characteristics. We used voxel-based morphometry to determine whether functional differences were dependent on structural differences.

Results

The visual network exhibited significant differences in regions (bilateral cunei, right lingual gyrus and left calcarine sulcus) by inter-group comparison. The patients with MwoA showed significantly increased FC between the left thalami and bilateral cunei and between the right thalamus and the contralateral calcarine sulcus and right cuneus. Furthermore, the neural activation of the left calcarine sulcus was positively correlated with visual analogue scale scores (r = 0.319, p = 0.043), and enhanced FC between the left thalamus and right cuneus in migraine patients was negatively correlated with Generalized Anxiety Disorder scores (r = − 0.617, p = 0.005).

Conclusion

Our data suggest that migraine distress is exacerbated by aberrant feedback projections to the visual network, playing a crucial role in migraine physiological mechanisms. The current study provides further insights into the complex scenario of migraine mechanisms.

Introduction

Migraine is typically characterized as a throbbing, unilateral pain and is usually accompanied by nausea, vomiting, and exaggerated sensitivities to normally well-tolerated light, noise and smell [1]. Migraine patients often suffer from anxiety, depression, sleep disturbances, and other comorbid conditions, significantly increasing the social burden and decreasing the quality of daily life [2]. Approximately one-third of migraineurs are preceded by visual, auditory, or somatosensory symptoms, termed the aura. The most common type of aura is characterized by visual discomfort which is associated with a reversible, transient and depolarized or hyperpolarized cortical event, termed cortical spreading depression (CSD). In addition, approximately 90% of migraineurs report symptoms of light hypersensitivity during a migraine attack, and about 45% report these symptoms in the interictal period [3, 4]. Therefore, investigating the mechanisms of the visual network in migraine may have significant implications for our understanding of the pathophysiology of migraine and its prognosis.

In recent decades, the pathophysiological mechanisms of visual pathway alterations have been extensively explored in neural disorders using different experimental approaches. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has proven to be a noninvasive and useful technique to explore the underlying pathogenesis of migraine-induced neural dysfunction, and spontaneous blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) responses have been used to probe the structural and functional abnormalities likely to contribute to migraine [5, 6]. However, functional imaging studies have not yet reached a consensus on the relevant changes in brain activation of the visual cortex. In terms of migraineurs with aura, some studies have demonstrated stronger activation in many brain regions associated with sensory-discriminative regulation, cognitive processing and pain modulation [7, 8]. On the other hand, some studies about migraineurs without aura have shown conflicting abnormalities compared with healthy controls (HC) [9, 10]. With the independent component method, migraine was linked to disrupted resting-state functional connectivity (FC) in multiple intrinsic neural networks including the visual network [11]. Although migraine has been characterized as a neurodevelopmental disorder of brain dysfunction, the pathophysiological mechanisms between aberrant activation of the visual network and emotional symptoms is still unclear.

Furthermore, previous functional imaging studies have proven that the thalamus, a key component of the trigemino-thalamo-cortical pathway, is regarded as a relay region for transmitting information out to the cerebral cortex and receiving feedback information from the cerebral areas [12, 13]. CSD is a potential neurophysiological phenomenon underlying the migraine and resulting in cortical network depolarization [4]. CSD-associated nociceptive information is transmitted through the trigeminovascular system to the brainstem and subsequently to thalamic and cortical areas to produce the sensation of pain [14]. In addition, some studies have demonstrated abnormal thalamic FC with the visual network or visual-related cortex in migraineurs compared with HC [15, 16]. With the diffusion tensor imaging technique, the study showed significantly higher fractional anisotropy and lower mean diffusivity in the bilateral thalami in migraine patients without aura [17]. These neurophysiological studies have already demonstrated that thalamic anomalies produce an alteration in the cortical processing of sensory information, including visual information. Notably, migraine and migraine-induced symptoms have a strong association with anxiety and depression [2]. Additional network circuits have been implicated in migraine pathophysiology and other types of negative emotional and affective processes, including the thalamo-cortical system, based on evidence for altered microstructures and functional connectivities [18]. Nevertheless, few of the currently available studies have specifically revealed abnormal thalamic FC with the visual network and correlations with neuropsychiatric symptoms. Therefore, probing the mechanisms of abnormal FC of the thalamus with the visual network and neuropsychiatric symptoms in MwoA may have significant implications for our understanding of migraine pathophysiology and its prognosis.

Materials and methods

Subjects

Thirty-three consecutive, right-handed episodic migraine patients were prospectively recruited from our hospital. The inclusion criteria were in accordance with the International Classification of Headache Disorders, Third Edition (ICHD-3. Code 1.1) [19]. Twenty-two age- and sex-matched, right-handed subjects with no family history of migraine, were recruited from hospital staff members and their relatives. The exclusion criteria were the following: chronic systemic diseases, illness affecting central nervous system function, substance abuse, or contraindications to MRI. All patients were in the interictal state, the time from the end of the last attack being at least 72 h, while an interval of at least 72 h from the next attack, ascertained by a telephonic interview. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants according to the approval of the ethics committee of our university.

Assessments and neuropsychological tests

Demographic data included age, sex and the following clinical characteristics obtained from migraineurs without aura: disease duration, mean pain intensity of migraine attacks, attacks frequency, duration of attacks and related psychological tests. The mean pain intensity of migraine attacks was measured using a visual analogic scale (VAS). Headache impact was obtained using the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6). Moreover, measures of anxiety and depression were obtained using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), respectively.

MRI scanning parameters

MRI data were acquired using a 3.0 T MRI scanner (Ingenia, Philips Medical Systems, Netherlands) with an 8-channel receiver array head coil. The participants were instructed to lie quietly with their eyes closed and think of nothing, but to remain awake. To improve image quality, earplugs and foam pads were used to attenuate scanner noise and minimize head movements. Structural images were acquired with a three-dimensional turbo fast echo T1WI sequence with high resolution as follows: repetition time (TR) = 8.1 ms; echo time (TE) = 3.7 ms; slices = 170; thickness = 1 mm; gap = 0 mm; flip angle = 8°; matrix = 256 × 256; and field of view (FOV) = 256 mm × 256 mm. The structural sequence took 5 min and 29 s. Functional images were acquired axially using a gradient echo-planar imaging sequence as follows: TR = 2000 ms; TE = 30 ms; slices = 36; thickness = 4 mm; gap = 0 mm; FOV = 240 mm × 240 mm; matrix = 64 × 64; and flip angle = 90°. The fMRI sequence took 8 min and 8 s.

Data preprocessing

Standard image data preprocessing, statistical analysis and visualization were performed by a toolkit from Data Processing Assistant for Resting-State fMRI (DPARSF; http://www.restfmri.net). The first 10 points of all subjects were discarded to avoid unstable magnetization. Afterwards, the remaining images were processed by the following steps: slice-timing adjustment, realignment, spatial normalization into Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) (resampling voxel size = 3 mm × 3 mm × 3 mm), smoothing with a 4-mm Gaussian kernel, detrending and filtering (0.01–0.08 Hz). The participants who had head motion less than 2.0 mm displacement or a 2.0° rotation in any direction were included. To control for non-neural noise in the time series, parameters for head motion, white matter (WM) signal, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) signal were included as covariates in the linear regression.

Structural data were preprocessed using the Statistical Parametric Mapping software (SPM8, http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm) and a voxel-based morphometric (VBM) analysis. Images were first segmented into gray matter (GM), WM and CSF partitions. Total brain parenchyma volume was computed as the sum of GM and WM volumes. Subsequently, the GM partitions were utilized to create a template using the diffeomorphic anatomical registration through exponentiated lie algebra (DARTEL) algorithm. The warped GM images were then modulated and resliced within the template. Finally, a Gaussian kernel with a full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of 8 mm was used to smooth all the GM images. With respect to the region of interest (ROI) volume, the thalamus was defined using WFU PickAtlas software (http://www.ansir.wfubmc.edu). Obvious structural damage was not observed based on the conventional MRI series.

Independent component analysis (ICA) and ROI-wise FC analysis

Imaging data after preprocessing were analysed by Group ICA of fMRI Toolbox (GIFT, http://mialab.mrn.org/software/gift/). The number of independent components was determined using the fastICA and the self-organizing group ICA algorithms. The GICA back reconstruction step was used to separate single-subject components from the set of aggregate components calculated by the previous step. The visual network was selected from these components as the “best-fit” network component, previously described in an earlier fMRI study [20]. To estimate intra-group spatial consistency, we performed one-sample t-tests (p < 0.05, family-wise error (FWE) corrected) on the visual network spatial maps. To estimate inter-group differences in the visual network, we used two-sample t-tests (p < 0.001, uncorrected) within the mask created by the one-sample t-test, and the covariates (age, sex and GM volume) were removed to control their effects. The surviving clusters were reported and extracted as ROIs. Finally, individual ICA Z-scores were extracted from the visual clusters identified in the above analyses and used for linear correlation analyses with clinical parameters and neuropsychological test results.

The thalamus ROI was generated by WFU_PickAtlas software. Then, Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to calculate ROI-wise FC matrices between the mean time series of the thalamus and that of each ROI extracted from the visual network above. Finally, Fisher’s transform was conducted to normalize the correlation coefficients. For between-group comparisons, the statistical inference was performed at p < 0.001, uncorrected. Age, sex, whole-brain GM volume and ipsilateral thalamus volume were included as nuisance covariates.

Statistical analysis and correlation analysis

Differences in demographic data were analysed using a between-group t-test for means and a Chi-square test for proportions; p < 0.05 was significant. To examine the relationships between signal changes in neural activation and clinical indicators of MwoA, the mean Z-values of surviving regions identified by ICA and FC analysis were extracted for each patient. Partial correlations were implemented for calculating the correlation between the mean Z-values and clinical indicators after adjusting for age, sex, GM volume and ipsilateral thalamic parenchyma volume using SPSS 24.0 (version 24.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA), and the p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographic data and structural MRI findings

Table 1 summarizes the demographic and neurophysiological characteristics of the participants who were included in this study. The patients with MwoA and HC did not show significant differences in terms of age or sex. Moreover, the volumes of both groups did not reveal any significant differences, neither at a statistical threshold corrected for multiple comparisons (FDR corrected, q < 0.05) nor at an uncorrected threshold (p < 0.001; cluster size > 100) (Table 2).

Table 1 Characteristics of patients with MwoA and healthy contrasts
Table 2 Comparisons of volumes between patients with MwoA and healthy controls

ICA results

As illustrated in Fig. 1, a resting-state visual network, encompassing certain occipital and temporal cortices, corresponded to the previous description in both migraine patients and HCs. The resting-state visual network exhibited statistically significant regional differences between the two groups (p < 0.001, uncorrected). The bilateral cunei had an increased component activity in patients with MwoA compared with HC. However, the right lingual gyrus and left calcarine cortex demonstrated the opposite neural activity in MwoA relative to controls (Fig. 2; Table 3). Specifically, the two-sample t-tests revealed significant differences in the ICA Z-values of the significant brain regions in Fig. 2 (p < 0.001).

Fig. 1
figure1

Group-level visual network in patients with MwoA (A) and healthy controls (B). Statistical maps were overlaid on the inflated 3D brain surface from the ‘Colin 27’ atlas. Significant thresholds were corrected using cluster-level family-wise error (FWE) correction and set at p < 0.05, cluster size > 30. MwoA: migraine without aura

Fig. 2
figure2

T-maps of statistically significant differences within the visual network between patients with MwoA and HC (p < 0.001, uncorrected) (A). Comparison of average ICA Z-values in surviving visual areas between patients with MwoA and HC (B). ICA: independent component analysis; MwoA: migraine without aura; HC: healthy controls; L: left; R: right; **p < 0.001

Table 3 Significant differences in ICA-Z value within visual areas between two groups

ROI-wise FC analysis and correlation analysis results

Compared with HC, patients with MwoA showed significantly increased connectivity between the left thalamus and bilateral cunei. Moreover, the right thalamus also showed a stronger connectivity with the contralateral calcarine cortex and right cuneus (Fig. 3). The threshold was set at p < 0.001, uncorrected (cluster size > 10).

Fig. 3
figure3

Aberrant ROI-wise functional connectivity between the bilateral thalami and visual network in patients with MwoA compared with HC (A). The threshold was set at p < 0.001, uncorrected. The significant positively correlation between the ICA-Z values of the left calcarine sulcus and VAS scores (B). The significant negatively correlation between functional connectivity of the left thalamus to the right cuneus and GAD scores (C). THA: thalamus; CAL: calcarine; ICA: independent component analysis; VAS: visual analogic scale; GAD: generalized anxiety disorder; L: left; R: right

Furthermore, in patients with MwoA, the decreased ICA values of the left calcarine sulcus were positively correlated with VAS scores (r = 0.319, p = 0.043). For the left thalamus, the enhanced FC to the right cuneus demonstrated a negative correlation with GAD scores (r = − 0.617, p = 0.005) (Fig. 3). None of the other aberrant FC values were correlated with GAD or PHQ scores.

Discussion

In the current study, we compared GM, WM and brain parenchyma volumes but did not detect any differences, which was consistent with our previous study [21]. However, previous studies have reported disrupted volume measures in migraine patients in several brain networks, including the visual network [22, 23]. A longitudinal analysis [23] demonstrated that GM volume changes in migraine are dynamic and remodelled over time according to patients’ clinical features, and that many regions may be involved in the regulation of the progression of migraine characteristics. Since we did not detect any significant differences in GM volume between migraine patients and HC, the most likely explanation for this might be the absence of classification of clinical features in migraine patients, such as pain severity, disease duration and attacks frequency. On the other hand, an alternative possibility is that analytical techniques were not sensitive enough to detect regional differences in GM volume or intensity. Our findings suggested that abnormal neural activity and functional networks may exist prior to major structural alterations in patients with MwoA.

Consistent with previous network analyses, this study showed that several brain areas exhibited significantly abnormal ICA values, including the cuneus, lingual gyrus and calcarine sulcus. These areas are the major regions of the visual network identified in previous resting-state positron emission tomography (PET) [24] and fMRI [25] studies. ICA values decreased in the right lingual gyrus as well as in the left calcarine sulcus, which are mainly involved in processing and modulation of pain [26, 27]. A resting-state fMRI study [28] showed that similarly decreased regional homogeneity of the lingual gyrus in MwoA with long-term and short-term disease duration, compared with HC, and showed that a long history of MwoA might contribute to accumulating brain dysfunction due to repetitive attacks. Furthermore, PET research [29] has illustrated hypermetabolism in the right lingual gyrus, which is involved in visual-related perceptual abnormalities (e.g., photophobia, afterimages and visual snow) and non-visual symptoms (e.g., tinnitus). However, our findings did not detect any correlation between abnormal neural activation or volume of the lingual gyrus and scores from the neuropsychological tests. From the above findings, we speculated that resting-state functional abnormalities involving the lingual gyrus play a crucial role in migraine physiological mechanisms, but share certain modulation processes in different migraine subtypes and comorbidities.

In addition, decreased ICA values of the left calcarine sulcus were positively correlated with VAS scores in patients with MwoA. The calcarine sulcus, located on the medial surface of the occipital lobe, is the main node within the visual network. Moreover, the calcarine sulcus is responsible for multisensory processing in affective, sensory and cognitive aspects of pain [3, 30]. Furthermore, abnormal FC of the calcarine has been shown to be involved in many independent networks, corresponding to the perspective that the experience of pain is complex and involves multidimensional processing [31]. Thus, the lower activity of the left calcarine sulcus in MwoA patients could be related to the lower tolerance threshold to the normally noxious or non-noxious sensory stimuli. Besides, a longitudinal investigation [23] showed a significant morphological correlation between migraine progression and visual areas, especially in the calcarine cortex and cuneus. Our findings may indirectly explain the regulation of the calcarine sulcus in headache severity in another aspect. We speculated that the decreased ICA values of the left calcarine sulcus in patients with MwoA could be related to functional impairments in pain compensatory mechanisms and aggravate the visual burden in the long-term pain response.

The cuneus is within the extrastriate cortex and is involved in visual selective attention by relaying top-down information from the attention network to visual areas [32]. One PET study [33] showed that in patients with migraine, activation of the primary visual cortex was induced by the same luminous stimulation, during the spontaneous headache and after pain relief. Although the activation of the cuneus was captured in both conditions, no cortical activation was found in the attack-free period as expected by the similar luminous stimulation, which is contrary to our results. However, another PET study [24] did not induce significant activation in controls, but there was greater activation within the visual cortex in interictal migraineurs, with constant uniform luminance stimulus. Clinically, it has been hypothesized that migraineurs with visual discomfort have a lower sensitivity threshold to visual stimulation visually and a decreased pre-activation level of the sensory cortex compared with healthy subjects. The presentation of our results, in terms of the cuneus when there is increased activation in the interictal period, may account for the disrupted neural habituation. Therefore, the higher activation of the bilateral cunei may be involved in a compensatory role in the deficit of habituation and relieving the headache.

However, regional brain dysfunctions alone are not sufficient to explain the pathological mechanisms of migraine. Recent resting-state fMRI studies have provided evidence that dysfunctional connectivity within pain pathways and other sensory pathways led to the development of migraine during or between the attacks [25, 34]. The perception of nociceptive signals is mediated by the thalamus and the thalamic neurons project signals to somatosensory and visual cortices depending on the trigeminal pathway [35]. Most importantly, we provided direct evidence that spontaneous BOLD fluctuations in FC between the left thalamus and the right cuneus were negatively correlated with anxiety in the resting state. Our results are similar to recent resting-state fMRI findings in which the bilateral thalami participate in the regulation of the visual pathway [36]. In the current study, heightened intrinsic connectivity within the visual network in migraineurs may thereby set the stage for abnormally intensified responses to sensory information, such as pain-related signals. Increased connectivity of the thalamus to the visual cortex could provide a neuroanatomical framework for understanding why visual stimuli that are well-tolerated in controls can elicit an unpleasant experience in migraineurs and evoke escape responses. One possible explanation was that the pathogenesis of migraine seems to be driven by complex dysfunction of thalamic FC and temporal activation of neuronal networks. If the feedback system that inhibits visual perception is dysfunctional, the aberrant visual signals will be passed on to the cortex causing the conscious perception of nociception. Taken together, these studies suggest that the thalamus might regulate the balance facilitation and inhibition within dysfunctional pain control centers and plays a crucial role in modifying the top-down activity of pain control processing in migraine.

From the aforementioned discussions, the thalamus is a core structure in transmitting sensory input to the cortex, including painful and other negative signals. Our data indicate the involvement of thalamo-visual connectivity in the modulation of pain severity. This is in line with the effective preventative medications in the thalamus, such as beta-blockers and gabapentin [37, 38]. Additionally, migraine is more than just headache, and we have to take into account that migraineurs are suffering from accompanying symptoms to various sensory stimuli, even those that are well-tolerated by healthy controls. Our findings further suggest that neuronal modulation of the thalamo-visual pathway is responsible for emotional processing, such as anxiety, and decreases the adaptation of the thalamic cortex to negative signals. However, a recent study highlighted the regulatory mechanisms of brainstem circuits, rather than the thalamus as a core source of sensory adaptation [39].

The present study has several limitations. First, we did not remove the global signal in order to avoid spurious negative correlations. The negative correlations among brain regions have been associated with global signal removal, and this removal may affect correlation analyses between the thalamus and the visual cortex. Second, we must admit that no significant results persisted after the use of FDR correction, probably due in part to the relatively strict calculation. A more stringent threshold and Bonferroni correction will be considered in future studies. Nonetheless, our research is still meaningful for providing some insight in this field. Third, the difference in the timing of the data collection is another limitation in this study. Migraineurs can be studied during or between attacks, and migraineurs in different phases and subtypes have been induced different neural functional results. This limitation should be taken into account when interpreting the resting-state study, and this study might reflect only the neuropathological mechanisms of a particular subtype of migraine to some degree. Fourth, FC method could potentially help improve our understanding of underlying migraine mechanisms, but so far it has been suspected to be not reproducible and no reproducible neuroimaging biomarkers of migraine have been identified [40]. Finally, in addition to aberrant FC patterns, more studies are required to explore the possibility of differences in structural connectivity within the visual network in patients with MwoA, which can be measured by diffusion tensor imaging.

Conclusion

Despite these limitations, our current study identified associations of abnormal thalamic FC patterns to the visual network with anxiety in migraineurs without aura. In addition, disrupted neural activation of visual areas was detected in patients with MwoA in the resting state. These findings mainly explicate the possible role of the potential neural interactions within the thalamo-visual pathway, which may lead to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of MwoA.

Availability of data and materials

Clinical, neuroimaging and statistical data will be available upon request from any qualified investigator.

Abbreviations

BOLD:

Blood oxygenation level dependent

FC:

Functional connectivity

fMRI:

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

GAD:

Generalized anxiety disorder

HC:

Healthy controls

HIT:

Headache impact test

ICA:

Independent component analysis

MwoA:

Migraine without aura

PHQ:

Patient health questionnaire

VAS:

Visual analogic scale

References

  1. 1.

    Charles A (2018) The pathophysiology of migraine: implications for clinical management. The Lancet Neurology 17(2):174–182

  2. 2.

    Ligthart L, Gerrits MM, Boomsma DI, Penninx BW (2013) Anxiety and depression are associated with migraine and pain in general: an investigation of the interrelationships. J Pain 14(4):363–370

  3. 3.

    Schwedt TJ, Chiang C, Chong CD, Dodick DW (2015) Functional MRI of migraine. The Lancet Neurology 14(1):81–91

  4. 4.

    Noseda R, Burstein R (2013) Migraine pathophysiology: anatomy of the trigeminovascular pathway and associated neurological symptoms, cortical spreading depression, sensitization, and modulation of pain. Pain 154:S44–S53

  5. 5.

    Chong CD, Schwedt TJ, Hougaard A (2017) Brain functional connectivity in headache disorders: A narrative review of MRI investigations. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 39(4):650–669

  6. 6.

    Lovati C, Giani L, Mele F, Sinelli A, Tien TT, Preziosa G, Mariani C (2016) Brain plasticity and migraine transformation: fMRI evidences. Expert Rev Neurother 16(12):1413–1425

  7. 7.

    Datta R, Aguirre GK, Hu S, Detre JA, Cucchiara B (2013) Interictal cortical hyperresponsiveness in migraine is directly related to the presence of aura. Cephalalgia 33(6):365–374

  8. 8.

    Griebe M, Flux F, Wolf ME, Hennerici MG, Szabo K (2014) Multimodal assessment of optokinetic visual stimulation response in migraine with aura. Headache 54(1):131–141

  9. 9.

    Xue T, Yuan K, Cheng P, Zhao L, Zhao L, Yu D, Dong T, Deneen KM, Gong Q, Qin W, Tian J (2013) Alterations of regional spontaneous neuronal activity and corresponding brain circuit changes during resting state in migraine without aura. NMR Biomed 26(9):1051–1058

  10. 10.

    Liu J, Zhao L, Lei F, Zhang Y, Yuan K, Gong Q, Liang F, Tian J (2015) Disrupted resting-state functional connectivity and its changing trend in migraine suffers. Hum Brain Mapp 36(5):1892–1907

  11. 11.

    Yu D, Yuan K, Luo L, Zhai J, Bi Y, Xue T, Ren X, Zhang M, Ren G, Lu X (2017) Abnormal functional integration across core brain networks in migraine without aura. Mol Pain 13:1–10

  12. 12.

    Noseda R, Jakubowski M, Kainz V, Borsook D, Burstein R (2011) Cortical projections of functionally identified thalamic trigeminovascular neurons: implications for migraine headache and its associated symptoms. J Neurosci 31(40):14204–14217

  13. 13.

    Herrero MXE, A-Trinidad BC, Navarro J (2002) Functional anatomy of thalamus and basal ganglia. Childs Nerv Syst 18(8):386–404

  14. 14.

    Tolner E A,Chen S and Eikermann-Haerter K. (2019) Current understanding of cortical structure and function in migraine. Cephalalgia 0 (0), 1–17

  15. 15.

    Coppola G, Di Renzo A, Tinelli E, Lepre C, Di Lorenzo C, Di Lorenzo G, Scapeccia M, Parisi V, Serrao M, Colonnese C, Schoenen J, Pierelli F (2016) Thalamo-cortical network activity between migraine attacks: insights from MRI-based microstructural and functional resting-state network correlation analysis. The Journal of Headache and Pain 17(1):1–9

  16. 16.

    Coppola G, Di Renzo A, Tinelli E, Di Lorenzo C, Di Lorenzo G, Parisi V, Serrao M, Schoenen J, Pierelli F (2016) Thalamo-cortical network activity during spontaneous migraine attacks. Neurology 87(20):2154–2160

  17. 17.

    Coppola G, Tinelli E, Lepre C, Iacovelli E, Di Lorenzo C, Di Lorenzo G, Serrao M, Pauri F, Fiermonte G, Bianco F, Pierelli F (2014) Dynamic changes in thalamic microstructure of migraine without aura patients: a diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur J Neurol 21(2):213–287

  18. 18.

    Mehnert J, Bader D, Nolte G, May A (2019) Visual input drives increased occipital responsiveness and harmonized oscillations in multiple cortical areas in migraineurs. NeuroImage: Clinical 23:101815

  19. 19.

    Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) (2013) The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 33(9):629–808

  20. 20.

    Smith SM, Fox PT, Miller KL, Glahn DC, Fox PM, Mackay CE, Filippini N, Watkins KE, Toro R, Laird AR, Beckmann CF (2009) Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(31):13040–13045

  21. 21.

    Wei H, Chen J, Chen Y, Yu Y, Zhou G, Qu L, Yin X, Li J and Zhang H. (2019) Impaired functional connectivity of limbic system in migraine without aura. Brain Imaging and Behavior https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-019-00116-5

  22. 22.

    Szabó N, Faragó P, Király A, Veréb D, Csete G, Tóth E, Kocsis K, Kincses B, Tuka B, Párdutz Á, Szok D, Tajti J, Vécsei L, Kincses ZT (2018) Evidence for plastic processes in migraine with aura: a diffusion weighted MRI study. Front Neuroanat 11:138

  23. 23.

    Messina R, Rocca MA, Colombo B, Pagani E, Falini A, Goadsby PJ, Filippi M (2018) Gray matter volume modifications in migraine. Neurology 91(3):e280–e292

  24. 24.

    Boulloche N, Denuelle M, Payoux P, Fabre N, Trotter Y, Geraud G (2010) Photophobia in migraine: an interictal PET study of cortical hyperexcitability and its modulation by pain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 81(9):978–984

  25. 25.

    Lee MJ, Park B, Cho S, Kim ST, Park H, Chung C (2019) Increased connectivity of pain matrix in chronic migraine: a resting-state functional MRI study. The Journal of Headache and Pain 20(1):1–10

  26. 26.

    Tedeschi G, Russo A, Conte F, Corbo D, Caiazzo G, Giordano A, Conforti R, Esposito F, Tessitore A (2015) Increased interictal visual network connectivity in patients with migraine with aura. Cephalalgia 36(2):139–147

  27. 27.

    Conforto AB, Chaim KT, Peres MFP, Gonçalves AL, Siqueira IL, Barreiros MAM, Amaro JE (2017) Interictal abnormal fMRI activation of visual areas during a motor task cued by visual stimuli in migraine. Einstein (São Paulo) 15(1):17–23

  28. 28.

    Zhao L, Liu J, Dong X, Peng Y, Yuan K, Wu F, Sun J, Gong Q, Qin W, Liang F (2013) Alterations in regional homogeneity assessed by fMRI in patients with migraine without aura stratified by disease duration. The Journal of Headache and Pain 14(1):1–9

  29. 29.

    Schankin CJ, Maniyar FH, Sprenger T, Chou DE, Eller M, Goadsby PJ (2014) The relation between migraine, typical migraine aura and "visual snow". Headache 54(6):957–966

  30. 30.

    Klein I, Paradis A, Poline J, Kosslyn S M and Le Bihan D. (2000) Transient activity in the human calcarine cortex during visual-mental imagery: an event-related fMRI study. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 12 (supplement 2), 15-23

  31. 31.

    Yu Z, Peng J, Lv Y, Zhao M, Xie B, Liang M, Li H, Zhou Z (2016) Different mean thickness implicates involvement of the cortex in migraine. Medicine 95(37):e4824

  32. 32.

    Ninomiya T, Sawamura H, Inoue KI, Takada M (2012) Segregated pathways carrying frontally derived top-down signals to visual areas MT and V4 in macaques. J Neurosci 32(20):6851–6858

  33. 33.

    Denuelle M, Boulloche N, Payoux P, Fabre N, Trotter Y, Géraud G (2011) A PET study of photophobia during spontaneous migraine attacks. Neurology 76(3):213–218

  34. 34.

    Ruscheweyh R, Pereira D, Hasenbring MI, Straube A (2019) Pain-related avoidance and endurance behaviour in migraine: an observational study. The Journal of Headache and Pain 20(1):1–9

  35. 35.

    Noseda R, Kainz V, Jakubowski M, Gooley JJ, Saper CB, Digre K, Burstein R (2010) A neural mechanism for exacerbation of headache by light. Nat Neurosci 13(2):239–245

  36. 36.

    Wang T, Chen N, Zhan W, Liu J, Zhang J, Liu Q, Huang H, He L, Zhang J, Gong Q (2015) Altered effective connectivity of posterior thalamus in migraine with cutaneous allodynia: a resting-state fMRI study with granger causality analysis. The J Headache Pain 17(1):17

  37. 37.

    Andreou AP, Shields KG, Goadsby PJ (2010) GABA and valproate modulate trigeminovascular nociceptive transmission in the thalamus. Neurobiol Dis 37(2):314–323

  38. 38.

    Shields KG (2004) Propranolol modulates trigeminovascular responses in thalamic ventroposteromedial nucleus: a role in migraine? Brain 128(1):86–97

  39. 39.

    Ganmor E, Katz Y, Lampl I (2010) Intensity-dependent adaptation of cortical and thalamic neurons is controlled by brainstem circuits of the sensory pathway. Neuron 66(2):273–286

  40. 40.

    Skorobogatykh K, van Hoogstraten WS, Degan D, Prischepa A, Savitskaya A, Ileen BM, Bentivegna E, Skiba I, D Acunto L, Ferri L, Sacco S, Hansen JM, Amin FM (2019) Functional connectivity studies in migraine: what have we learned? The J Headache Pain 20(1):108

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all migraineurs and controls for their participation in the study.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

WHL designed and drafted the manuscript. ZX and CYC analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. YYS, GX, ZGP and ZQQ performed the experiments. QLJ contributed to the acquisition of fMRI data and analyzed them. YX, LJ and ZH revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Junrong Li or Hong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All patients and controls provided written informed consent prior to participation. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee according to Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, H., Zhou, X., Chen, Y. et al. Impaired intrinsic functional connectivity between the thalamus and visual cortex in migraine without aura. J Headache Pain 20, 116 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-1065-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Migraine
  • Thalamus
  • Visual network
  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.