Skip to main content

Advertisement

Correction to: Ultra-high field MR angiography in human migraine models: a 3.0 T/7.0 T comparison study

The original article was published in The Journal of Headache and Pain 2019 20:48

Correction to: J Headache Pain

https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-0996-x

After publication of the original article [1], the authors have notified us that an updated version of Figures 1, 2 and 3 should have been published. The incorrect and revised figures can be found below.

Incorrect figures:

figurea
figureb
figurec

Revised figures:

Fig. 1
figure1

Standard deviations of the intradural MMA measurements in the four analysis iterations. 7.0 T High Res: 7.0 T scan at full resolution; 7.0 T Low Res: 7.0 T scan resampled to 3.0 T resolution

Fig. 2
figure2

Change in intradural MMA circumference over time after each of the three interventions. 3.0 T and 7.0 T data is depicted as mean ± SE, all data analyzed with LAVA software

Fig. 3
figure3

Bland-Altmann plot depicting agreement between circumference measurements of intradural MMA 3.0 T vs 7.0 T within subject, within drug, within time point analyzed with LAVA software. Each point represents difference in circumference between 3.0 T and 7.0 T as a function of mean of the two measurements. Dashed lines are overall mean of differences ±2SD

The original article has been corrected.

Reference

  1. 1.

    Christensen et al (2019) Ultra-high field MR angiography in human migraine models: a 3.0 T/7.0 T comparison study. J Headache Pain 20:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-0996-x

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Messoud Ashina.

Additional information

The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-0996-x

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.