- Research article
- Open Access
The effect of 1 mg folic acid supplementation on clinical outcomes in female migraine with aura patients
© The Author(s). 2016
- Received: 13 May 2016
- Accepted: 17 June 2016
- Published: 23 June 2016
Migraine is a common neurovascular condition that may be linked to hyperhomocysteinemia. We have previously provided evidence that reduction of homocysteine with a vitamin supplementation can reduce the occurrence of migraine in women. The current study examined the occurrence of migraine in response to vitamin supplementation with a lower dose of folic acid.
This was a 6 month randomised, double blinded placebo controlled trial of daily vitamin supplementation containing 1 mg of folic acid, 25 mg of Vitamin B6 and Vitamin B12, on reduction of homocysteine and the occurrence of migraine in 300 female patients diagnosed with migraine with aura.
Vitamin supplementation with 1 mg of folic acid, did not significantly decrease homocysteine levels (P = 0.2). The treatment group did not show a significant decrease in the percentage of participants with high migraine disability, severity or frequency at the end of the 6 month intervention (P > 0.1).
1 mg of folic acid in combination with vitamin B6 and B12 is less effective in reducing migraine associated symptoms compared to the previously tested dosage of 2 mg folic acid in combination with 25 mg of vitamin B6 and 400 μg of vitamin B12.
- Folic acid
- Vitamin B6
- Vitamin B12
Migraine is a very common episodic neurological disorder which is typically characterised by attacks of 4 to 72 h of severe headache and associated with autonomic and neurological symptoms . The International Headache Society (IHS) has classified migraine into migraine with aura (MA) and migraine without aura (MO) . The incidence of migraine is much higher in females (70 %) than in males (30 %) and is at its highest during the peak reproductive years (between the ages of 25 and 55 years) . Despite the high prevalence of migraine, its pathophysiology is not completely understood. The activation of the trigeminovascular system which results in vasodilation of pain producing intracranial blood vessels is thought to be responsible for the typical pain migraineurs experience . Family and twin studies have shown that both common and rare migraine subtypes have a significant genetic basis with environmental interactions also playing an important role in disease manifestation . Previous studies have identified neurological, vascular and hormonal pathways to be involved in migraine susceptibility and pathophysiology [5, 6].
The human methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene is involved in the remethylation of homocysteine to methionine. The C677T allele (rs1801133), a common variant of the MTHFR gene has a frequency of approximately 23–41 % in the Caucasian population . The TT genotype of the MTHFR C677T SNP has been shown to be associated with a 50 % reduction in enzyme activity and consequently moderately increased levels of circulating homocysteine [7–10]. This variant and elevated homocysteine levels have been associated with the risk of several neurological conditions including migraine [11, 12]. Homocysteine related endothelial dysfunction might be involved in the initiation and maintenance of a migraine attack. Several studies have shown the TT genotype of the MTHFRC677T variant to significantly increase the risk of MA [8, 9].
Our laboratory has previously investigated the homocysteine-lowering effects of vitamin supplementation in MA patients and the modifying effect of C677T genotype on treatment response. In the Phase 1 trial, the effects of 2 mg folic acid, 25 mg vitamin B6 and 400 μg vitamin B12 were examined in 52 MA sufferers . The major finding of this study was that vitamin supplementation reduced plasma homocysteine levels and migraine disability significantly in this migraine group. This study also provided some evidence that the effect of vitamin supplementation on reduction of homocysteine levels and migraine disability was influenced by the MTHFRC677T genotype, whereby carriers of the C allele experienced a greater response compared to TT genotypes .
In the Phase 2 trial we replicated the treatment options in an independent and larger sample of MA sufferers and examined the genotypic effects of both the MTHFR and MTRR (5-Methyltetrahydrofolate-Homocysteine Methyltransferase Reductase) gene on the reduction of homocysteine and migraine disability in response to vitamin supplementation . The Phase 2 trial provided further evidence that the MTHFR variant influences treatment response and that the MTRR variant may also be acting independently to influence vitamin treatment response in migraineurs. Despite improvements in some participants, the more functionally affected MTHFR T allele and MTRR G carriers seemed to resist homocysteine reduction and did not respond as well in terms of alleviation of migraine symptoms . The purpose of this study was to determine if a lower folic acid dosage (1 mg) that lies within the currently recommended daily intake range was also effective in reducing homocysteine levels and migraine disability. This would enable the development of safe, personalised treatment and prophylactic regimes for migraine in the community.
The study recruited female Caucasian adult participants. European descents living in Australia, having emigrating ancestors within the last 160 years from various locations within the British Isles and other parts of Europe were recruited from East Coast of Australia and were interviewed and completed a detailed questionnaire that was administered through the Genomics Research Centre (GRC).
As migraine is more prevalent in females and this prevalence reduces drastically in males only females between the ages of 18 and 60 were recruited. Participants were included if they had suffered migraine for over > 5 years and had a current diagnosis of MA (>90 % of their migraine attacks were associated with aura), and a 1-year history of severe, long lasting attacks (at least 4 attacks lasting more than 48 h), had a family history of migraine. Confirmation of migraine diagnosis was carried out using the IHS criteria. As this hypothesised that the outcome variable, the response to vitamin therapy is influenced by inherited factors, genetic independence of participants was given important attention. Thus it was made sure that only participants that are not related by first degree were included in the study. Participants who were currently taking vitamin supplementation, were pregnant, or had been diagnosed with a clinically recognised co-morbid disease such as vascular disease, depression or epilepsy were excluded from the trial to reduce clinical and pathological heterogeneity. Participants that had taken part in another clinical trial or had received any experimental therapy within the last one month were also excluded from the trial. The patient group was not selected on the basis of pre-existing folic acid, B12 or B6 deficiency. This study was originally approved by Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC), approval number MSC/09/05/HREC.
Randomisation and blinding
Three hundred female patients meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned into either the placebo or the treatment group. A blocked random allocation sequence was generated using nQuery Advisor (Statistical Solutions, Cork, [Ireland]). Patients and everyone involved in this trial were blinded to randomisation and group allocation. One hundred random female patients were assigned to the placebo group and 200 random female patients were assigned to the vitamin tablet. The numbers in the treatment group were higher to increase the power for genotype comparisons in relation to treatment response.
Patients received either vitamin tablets containing 1 mg of folic acid, 25 mg of vitamin B6 and 400 μg of vitamin B12 or the placebo tablet. Both the vitamin and placebo tablets were produced by Blackmores (Warriewood, New South Wales, Australia) and were indistinguishable in appearance. Patients were instructed to take one tablet daily for 6 months.
Baseline and follow-up assessment
Before the treatment all participants were assessed for migraine disability using the Migraine Disability Assessment Score (MIDAS) instrument, which provides a measure of productive days lost to migraine headache in previous 3 months (i.e. migraine disability), as well as headache frequency and pain severity [13, 15]. Patients were asked to complete a daily diary during the trial period to record the details of their migraine symptoms (duration, frequency and severity) and treatment compliance. Patients were also instructed to take their usual migraine treatment for acute attacks. A blood sample was collected for baseline measurement of plasma homocysteine (μmol/l), folate (nmol/l), vitamin B6 and B12 (pmol/l) concentration. 2 ml of venous blood was collected for Genomic DNA extraction and genotyping purposes.
Patients were contacted after 3 months for headache diary and compliance checking. At the end of the 6 month trial the patients were reassessed at the GRC clinic. They were questioned about their migraine history in the last 6 months since the start of the trial. A second collection of blood samples was done for measurement of homocysteine, folate, B6 and B12 concentrations.
Clinical outcome measures
Migraine disability measured by the MIDAS instrument was the primary clinical outcome in this trial. Studies have shown that the MIDAS instrument is a valid and clinically useful instrument for assessing health-related quality of life in migraineurs. Based on the 5-question MIDAS rating, participants were arbitrarily categorised into a ‘low’ disability group if they had a MIDAS rating of 0–10 and into a ‘high’ disability group if they had a MIDAS rating greater than 11 [13, 15, 16]. Secondary outcome variables, which are partly captured within the primary outcome, were migraine frequency and head pain severity. These were measured as number of days with headache (over a 3 month period) and a pain score (based on a scale of 1–10), respectively [13, 15, 16].
The primary predictor variable for this study was the treatment groups (Vitamin vs placebo). The secondary predictor variables include plasma homocysteine levels and the C677T polymorphism of the MTHFR gene, grouped by TT and CT and CC genotypes. The C677T polymorphism was genotyped in the patient group in the GRC laboratory using previously published methods . The Plasma homocysteine, folate, B6 and B12 levels were measured in an accredited pathology laboratory (TetraQ, University of Queensland, Brisbane) [17, 18].
The analysis for the trial was conducted on a modified intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. The modified ITT cohort was composed of all randomised participants who started the trial and consumed study supplements on at least one occasion, excluding those who withdrew from the trial after the randomisation process had taken place but before the commencement of study supplement consumption. At baseline and follow-up time points, unpaired samples t-tests were used to test the group means and proportions were compared using the χ2 test of independence. The significance threshold was set at α level of 0.05. All analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 18.0; International Business Machines, Chicago, Illinois, USA).
Clinical characteristics of patient groups at baseline
Placebo (n = 87)
1 mg (n = 170)
79 (91 %)
134 (79 %)
56 (64 %)
109 (64 %)
43 (49 %)
Values are mean (SD) or n (%)
Summary of blood biochemistry measures at follow-up*
Placebo (n = 63)
1 mg (n = 126)
Summary of migraine outcomes at follow-up*
Placebo (n = 63)
1 mg (n = 126)
(a) High Disability
34 (52 %)
56 (45 %)
(b) High Frequency
28 (43 %)
44 (36 %)
(c) High Severity
12 (19 %)
16 (13 %)
When the treatment group was stratified by the MTHFR C677T genotype, an overall decrease in the percentage of high migraine disability, frequency and severity was observed for all three genotype groups after the 6 months of intervention however the decrease was not statistically significant(P > 0.10).
Migraine is a chronic and debilitating condition that has significant impact on both the sufferer and the society at large . Although there are several migraine therapies and medications currently available to treat migraine, most of them work with differing efficacy and are often associated with adverse effects . Migraine research thus continues to explore new and/or improved migraine treatments that are both effective and safe for use by all migraineurs .
The Genomics Research Centre had previously tested the effects of folate and vitamin B treatment response in migraineurs in two previous studies [13, 14]. The results of these previous studies and have reported the significant decrease in migraine associated symptoms after a 6 month intervention of a vitamin tablet containing 2 mg folic acid, 25 mg of vitamin B6 and 400 μg of vitamin B12 . When the effect of the MTHFRC677T and the MTRR A66G genetic variants on migraine treatment was assessed, it was observed that both these variants exert an independent effect on migraine treatment response .
The current trial investigated the effect of 1 mg folic acid, 25 mg of vitamin B6 and 400 μg of vitamin B12 on migraine associated symptoms on adult Caucasian females with MA. The aims of the current study was to investigate the effectiveness of a vitamin supplementation incorporating 1 mg folic acid, 25 mg of vitamin B6 and 400 μg of vitamin B12 in significantly reducing migraine associated symptoms and to investigate the effect of the MTHFRC677T variant on the reduction of homocysteine and migraine associated symptoms in response to the vitamin supplementation.
The results of this trial did not observe a significant reduction in homocysteine levels in the treatment group compared to the placebo group (P = 0.2) and there was also no significant decrease observed in migraine disability, frequency or severity in treatment group compared to the placebo group at the end of the treatment period. This result was in contrast to the previous trials which investigated vitamin supplementation of 2 mg folic acid, 25 mg of vitamin B6 and 400 μg of vitamin B12 and reported significant decrease in homocysteine levels as well as migraine associated symptoms compared to the placebo group at the end of treatment period. Similarly while the previous trial reported migraine associated variants, in the MTHFR and MTRR genes to have a significant effect on migraine treatment response, the current trial did not observe any significant effect of the MTHFR C677T gene variant on migraine treatment response. This current study has provided evidence that the folic acid dosage in the proposed vitamin supplementation for migraine treatment plays a pertinent part in reducing homocysteine levels and migraine associated symptoms.
Folate, a water-soluble vitamin, includes endogenous food folate and its synthetic form, folic acid . Folate lacks stability in its naturally occurring form in food storage and preparation; however, folic acid is stable and used for supplements and food fortification . There are many critical cellular pathways dependent on folate as a one-carbon source, including DNA, RNA, and protein methylation, as well as DNA synthesis and maintenance . A number of genetic polymorphisms affect critical components of folate pathways and metabolism, and have been associated with an increased risk for several diseases [25–31]. Mandatory folate fortification of wheat flour was implemented in Australia in 2009. The tolerable upper intake level (UL) (1000 μg/day)of folic acid was established as one-fifth of the lowest observed adverse effect level (5000 μg/day) associated with a potential adverse outcome . Even at dosages of 15,000–100,000 μg of folic acid daily, limited evidence was found of direct toxicity from folic acid [33–38]. However recently the possibility that folic acid intake might lead to changes in epigenetic patterns and thus the plausible hypotheses of how folic acid might affect certain diseases has led to concerns about higher folic acid intake and food fortification programs.
The most important concern has surrounded cancer as the field of epigenetics has been studied largely in the context of tumorogenesis where clear DNA methylation pattern changes in tumors have been reported [39–44]. It has been suggested that early exposure to folic acid might prevent some cancers and in contrast, after the development of tumors, higher intake of folic acid might promote growth of existing tumors . However, a very recent meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of the effects of B vitamins on 37,485 individuals with existing cardiovascular disease showed no increased risk of cancer incidence. Additionally, since the implementation of mandatory folic acid fortification in the United States in 1998, both incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer have continued to decline . With such varying studies results, extensive research is warranted to fully understand the effect of folic acid on disease risk.
Further research is thus needed to understand the use of vitamin supplementation incorporating various doses of folic acid, vitamin B6 and B12 in regards to not only on the reduction of migraine associated symptoms but also the long term effects of vitamin supplementation on the general well-being of migraineurs.
The recommend dosage of 1 mg folic acid in combination with vitamins vitamin B6 and B12 is less effective in reducing migraine associated symptoms compared to the previously tested dosage of 2 mg folic acid in combination with 25 mg of vitamin B6 and 400 μg of vitamin B12.
The authors acknowledge all the participants of this study who consented and volunteered to participate in the trial.
This study was supported by funding from a Queensland (Qld) Government Smart State CIF grant. The Genomics Research Centre is a member of the Therapeutic Innovation Australia (TIA), QLD node with funding provided through an ARC EIF Super Science Initiative, TIA NCRIS 2013 and TIA NCRIS 2015.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- de Vries B et al (2009) Molecular genetics of migraine. Hum Genet 126(1):115–32View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- (1994) Guidelines on the investigation and diagnosis of cobalamin and folate deficiencies. A publication of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology. BCSH General Haematology Test Force. Clin Lab Haematol. 16(2): 101–15Google Scholar
- Stovner L et al (2007) The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia 27(3):193–210View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goadsby PJ et al (2009) Neurobiology of migraine. Neuroscience 161(2):327–41View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cutrer FM (2010) Pathophysiology of migraine. Semin Neurol 30(2):120–30View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pietrobon D, Moskowitz MA (2013) Pathophysiology of migraine. Annu Rev Physiol 75:365–91View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kara I et al (2003) Association of the C677T and A1298C polymorphisms in the 5,10 methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene in patients with migraine risk. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 111(1–2):84–90View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kowa H et al (2000) The homozygous C677T mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene is a genetic risk factor for migraine. Am J Med Genet 96(6):762–4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lea RA et al (2004) The methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene variant C677T influences susceptibility to migraine with aura. BMC Med 2:3View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Di Rosa G et al (2007) Efficacy of folic acid in children with migraine, hyperhomocysteinemia and MTHFR polymorphisms. Headache 47(9):1342–4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klerk M et al (2002) MTHFR 677C-- > T polymorphism and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA 288(16):2023–31View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aguilar B, Rojas JC, Collados MT (2004) Metabolism of homocysteine and its relationship with cardiovascular disease. J Thromb Thrombolysis 18(2):75–87View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lea R et al (2009) The effects of vitamin supplementation and MTHFR (C677T) genotype on homocysteine-lowering and migraine disability. Pharmacogenet Genomics 19(6):422–8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menon S et al (2012) Genotypes of the MTHFR C677T and MTRR A66G genes act independently to reduce migraine disability in response to vitamin supplementation. Pharmacogenet Genomics 22(10):741–9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stewart WF et al (1999) Validity of an illness severity measure for headache in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Pain 79(2–3):291–301View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stewart WF et al (1999) Reliability of the migraine disability assessment score in a population-based sample of headache sufferers. Cephalalgia 19(2):107–14, discussion 74View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ghassabian S et al (2014) Fully validated LC-MS/MS method for quantification of homocysteine concentrations in samples of human serum: a new approach. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 972:14–21View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ghassabian S, Griffiths L, Smith MT (2015) A novel fully validated LC-MS/MS method for quantification of pyridoxal-5’-phosphate concentrations in samples of human whole blood. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 1000:77–83View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leonardi M et al (2005) The global burden of migraine: measuring disability in headache disorders with WHO’s classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). J Headache Pain 6(6):429–40View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rapoport A (2011) New frontiers in headache therapy. Neurol Sci 32(Suppl 1):S105–9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rainero I et al (2013) Genes and primary headaches: discovering new potential therapeutic targets. J Headache Pain 14:61View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Eitenmiller R, Landen W (1999) Vitamin analysis for the health and food science. Folate., pp 411–465Google Scholar
- O’Broin JD et al (1975) Nutritional stability of various naturally occurring monoglutamate derivatives of folic acid. Am J Clin Nutr 28(5):438–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stover PJ (2009) Folate biochemical pathways and their regulation. In: Folate in health and disease. Taylor & Francis Group, Gainesville, pp 49–74View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Choi SW, Mason JB (2002) Folate status: effects on pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis. J Nutr 132(8 Suppl):2413S–2418SPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bjelland I et al (2003) Folate, vitamin B12, homocysteine, and the MTHFR 677C- > T polymorphism in anxiety and depression: the hordaland homocysteine study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 60(6):618–26View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perez AB et al (2003) Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR): incidence of mutations C677T and A1298C in Brazilian population and its correlation with plasma homocysteine levels in spina bifida. Am J Med Genet A 119A(1):20–5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chango A et al (2005) No association between common polymorphisms in genes of folate and homocysteine metabolism and the risk of Down’s syndrome among French mothers. Br J Nutr 94(2):166–9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alcasabas P et al (2008) 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms and the risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in Filipino children. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51(2):178–82View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brustolin S, Giugliani R, Felix TM (2010) Genetics of homocysteine metabolism and associated disorders. Braz J Med Biol Res 43(1):1–7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sameer AS et al (2011) Risk of colorectal cancer associated with the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism in the Kashmiri population. Genet Mol Res 10(2):1200–10View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Insitute of Medicine, a., Dietary Reference Intakes for Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B6, Folate, Vitamin B12, Patothenic Acid, Biotin and Choline., in Folate. 1998, National Academy Press, Washington, p. 196–305Google Scholar
- Spies TD, Suarez RM et al (1946) The therapeutic effect of folic acid in tropical sprue. Science 104(2691):75View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gibberd FB et al (1970) Toxicity of folic acid. Lancet 1(7642):360–1PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hunter R et al (1970) Toxicity of folic acid given in pharmacological doses to healthy volunteers. Lancet 1(7637):61–3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hellstrom L (1971) Lack of toxicity of folic acid given in pharmacological doses to healthy volunteers. Lancet 1(7689):59–61View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Richens A (1971) Toxicity of folic acid. Lancet 1(7705):912View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sheehy TW (1973) Folic acid: lack of toxicity. Lancet 1(7793):37View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baylin SB (1997) Tying it all together: epigenetics, genetics, cell cycle, and cancer. Science 277(5334):1948–9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baylin SB, Herman JG (2000) DNA hypermethylation in tumorigenesis: epigenetics joins genetics. Trends Genet 16(4):168–74View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Momparler RL, Bovenzi V (2000) DNA methylation and cancer. J Cell Physiol 183(2):145–54View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feinberg AP (2001) Cancer epigenetics takes center stage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(2):392–4View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Esteller M (2008) Epigenetics in cancer. N Engl J Med 358(11):1148–59View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharma S, Kelly TK, Jones PA (2010) Epigenetics in cancer. Carcinogenesis 31(1):27–36View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ciappio E, Mason JB (2009) Folate and carcinogenesis basis mechanisms, in folate in health and disease. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 235–262Google Scholar
- Edwards BK et al (2010) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer 116(3):544–73View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar