- Oral presentation
- Open access
- Published:
O011. Patients with “prolonged aura” do not show clinical or demographic differences from the patients with “typical aura”
The Journal of Headache and Pain volume 16, Article number: A67 (2015)
Background
A recent systematic review of the duration of migraine aura reported that aura symptoms may last longer than one hour in a significant proportion of patients[1]. Here we investigated in a prospective diary-aided study whether patients with a “prolonged aura” (PA - an aura in which there is at least one symptom lasting for more than one hour) are different from the patients with a “typical aura” (TA).
Methods
We recruited 176 consecutive patients affected by migraine with aura at the Headache Centres of Pavia and Trondheim. The study received approval by the local Ethics Committees. All patients signed an informed consent form. Fifty-four patients completed the study recording prospectively the characteristics of three consecutive attacks in an ad hoc aura diary that included the time of onset and the end of each aura symptom and the headache. We also collected demographic and clinical variables of each patient including age, gender, presence of headache associated with aura, frequency of migraine with aura attacks, age at onset of migraine with aura, duration of illness, co-occurrence of migraine without aura or tension-type headache, age of migraine without aura onset, use of a migraine preventive therapy, family history for migraine with aura and white matter lesions at MRI in the analysis. We performed an analysis to evaluate if there was any demographic or clinical variable associated with having suffered from at least one PA out of three attacks.
Results
Fifty-four patients completed the study recording in a diary the characteristics of three consecutive auras (n=162 auras). Fourteen out of 54 patients (26%) had at least one PA, while 30 patients (74%) had three TA. In univariate analyses, none of the clinical or demographic parameters was significantly associated with the fact of having experienced a PA (Table 1).
Conclusions
For the first time we demonstrate that patients with “prolonged aura” have no demographic and clinical differences with patients with “typical aura”. These data support the need to review the ICHD criteria for migraine with aura.
Written informed consent to publication was obtained from the patient(s).
Conflict of interest
None.
References
Viana M, Sprenger T, Andelova M, Goadsby PJ: The typical duration of migraine aura: A systematic review. Cephalalgia. 2013, 33 (7): 483-90. 10.1177/0333102413479834.
Acknowledgements
This study was carried out in collaboration with UCADH (University Consortium for Adaptive Disorders and Head pain), University of Pavia, Italy. This work was supported by grants of the Italian Ministry of Health to RC 2013-2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Viana, M., Linde, M., Sances, G. et al. O011. Patients with “prolonged aura” do not show clinical or demographic differences from the patients with “typical aura”. J Headache Pain 16 (Suppl 1), A67 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-16-S1-A67
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-16-S1-A67