- Poster presentation
- Open access
- Published:
P019. Transcutaneous supraorbital neurostimulation in “de novo” patients with migraine without aura: the first Italian experience
The Journal of Headache and Pain volume 16, Article number: A136 (2015)
Background
Pharmacological anti-migraine preventive therapies are widely used to reduce the impact of migraine on quality of life; nevertheless, they may exhibit incomplete efficacy and significant side effects. Transcutaneous supraorbital neurostimulation (tSNS) has been recently proposed for the treatment of migraine. Moreover, tSNS has been recently found superior to sham stimulation for episodic migraine prevention in a randomized trial [1].
Objective
To evaluate both the safety and efficacy of a brief period of tSNS in a group of patients with migraine without aura (MwoA). To this end, we used a tSNS medical device, called Cefaly® (CEFALY Technology, Herstal, Belgium), approved for use in migraine prevention by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and for sale in Europe.
Methods
We enrolled 24 consecutive patients with MwoA experiencing a low frequency of attacks (≤5 attacks/month), whom had never taken migraine preventive drugs in the course of their life. Patients performed a daily supraorbital high frequency tSNS, for 20 minutes, for two months. Primary outcome measures were the reduction in migraine attacks and migraine days per month (p < 0.05). Secondary outcome measures were the reduction of headache severity during migraine attacks (by means of visual analogic scale) and HIT-6 (Headache Impact Test) rating, as well as in monthly intake of rescue medication (p < 0.05). Finally, compliance, treatment satisfaction, and potential adverse effects related to tSNS were evaluated.
Results
Between run-in and second month of tSNS treatment, both primary and secondary endpoints were met. Indeed, we observed a statistically significant decrease in the frequency of migraine attacks (p < 0.001) and migraine days (p < 0.001) per month, as well as a reduction in average pain intensity during migraine attacks (p = 0.002), HIT-6 rating (p < 0.001), and intake of rescue medication (p < 0.001). All patients showed good compliance levels and no relevant adverse events occurred during the tSNS period.
Conclusions
In patients with MwoA experiencing a low frequency of attacks, significant improvements in multiple migraine severity parameters was observed following a brief period of high frequency tSNS [2]. Therefore, tSNS may be considered a valid option for the preventive treatment of migraine attacks in patients who cannot or are not willing to take daily medications, or in which low migraine frequency and/or intensity would not require pharmacological preventive therapies.
Written informed consent to publish was obtained from the patient(s).
References
Schoenen J, Vandersmissen B, Jeangette S, Herroelen L, Vandenheede M, Gérard P, Magis D: Migraine prevention with a supraorbital transcutaneous stimulator: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2013, 80 (8): 697-704.
Magis D, Sava S, d'Elia TS, Baschi R, Schoenen J: Safety and patients’ satisfaction of transcutaneous supraorbital neurostimulation (tSNS) with the Cefaly® device in headache treatment: a survey of 2,313 headache sufferers in the general population. J Headache Pain. 2013, 14: 95-
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Russo, A., Conte, F., Marcuccio, L. et al. P019. Transcutaneous supraorbital neurostimulation in “de novo” patients with migraine without aura: the first Italian experience. J Headache Pain 16 (Suppl 1), A136 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-16-S1-A136
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-16-S1-A136