Skip to main content

Table 3 Prediction performance results of various models in training set

From: Development and validation of non-invasive prediction models for migraine in Chinese adults

Model *

No. of variables

AUC(95%CI)

Sensitivity

Specificity

Youden index

Cut off value

P for H–L test #

Model 1

1

0.83(0.77–0.89)

0.820

0.683

0.504

0.621

0.923

Model 2

2

0.86(0.80–0.91)

0.789

0.833

0.622

0.640

0.390

Model 3

3

0.87(0.82–0.92)a

0.781

0.833

0.615

0.653

0.688

Model 4

4

0.88(0.84–0.93)ab

0.867

0.767

0.634

0.569

0.289

Model 5

5

0.90(0.85–0.94)ab

0.813

0.850

0.663

0.698

0.873

Model 6

6

0.91(0.86–0.95)abcd

0.695

0.950

0.645

0.828

0.148

Model 7

7

0.91(0.87–0.95)abcd

0.766

0.900

0.666

0.762

0.632

Model 8

8

0.92(0.89–0.96)abcd

0.922

0.800

0.722

0.494

0.049

  1. *Model 1: logit(p1) = -2.365 + 0.572 × "PSQI score"; Model 2: logit(p2) = -2.954 + 0.547 × "PSQI score" + 0.034 × "Qi-depressed score"; Model 3: logit(p3) = -2.606 + 0.599 × "PSQI score" + 0.046 × "Qi-depressed score"-0.039 × "Inherited special score"; Model 4: logit(p4) = -2.667 + 0.581 × "PSQI score" + 0.039 × "Qi-depressed score" + 0.034 × "Blood-stasis score"-0.05 × "Phlegm-dampness score"; Model 5: logit(p5) = -2.267 + 0.554 × "PSQI score" + 0.046 × "Qi-depressed score" + 0.041 × "Qi-deficient score"-0.04 × "Phlegm-dampness score"-0.043 × "Inherited special score"; Model 6: logit(p6) = -2.446 + 0.574 × "PSQI score" + 0.036 × "Qi-depressed score" + 0.039 × "Qi-deficient score" + 0.048 × "Blood-stasis score"-0.059 × "Phlegm-dampness score"-0.055 × "Inherited special score"; Model 7: logit(p7) = -0.84 + 0.612 × "PSQI score"-0.057 × "SDS score" + 0.046 × "Qi-depressed score" + 0.052 × "Qi-deficient score" + 0.051 × "Blood-stasis score"-0.063 × "Phlegm-dampness score"-0.057 × "Inherited special score"; Model 8: logit(p8) = -2.687 + 0.532 × "PSQI score" + 0.12 × "SAS score"-0.111 × "SDS score" + 0.043 × "Qi-depressed score" + 0.055 × "Qi-deficient score" + 0.051 × "Blood-stasis score"-0.068 × "Phlegm-dampness score"-0.058 × "Inherited special score"
  2. #indicated the P value for the Hosmer–Lemeshow test for various model
  3. aindicated that after Delong test, the AUC was significantly better than model 1
  4. bindicated that after Delong test, the AUC was significantly better than model 2
  5. cindicated that after Delong test, the AUC was significantly better than model 3
  6. dindicated that after Delong test, the AUC was significantly better than model 4
  7. AUC Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, H–L Hosmer–Lemeshow
Back to article page

The Journal of Headache and Pain

ISSN: 1129-2377

Contact us