Skip to main content

Table 1 Assessment of inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of interventions. Direct, NMA, and indirect values represent effect sizes of mean difference between active and placebo arms in monthly migraine frequency from baseline to end of intervention. NMA = network meta-analysis

From: What is the efficacy of aerobic exercise versus strength training in the treatment of migraine? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of clinical trials

Comparison

Number of Studies

NMA

Direct Comparison 

Indirect Comparison

Difference between Direct & Indirect Comparison

p-value

StrengthTraining:Placebo

3

-3.55

-3.55

NA

NA

NA

HighAerobics:Placebo

3

-3.13

-3.21

-2.62

-0.60

0.85

StrengthTraining:Topiramate

0

-2.57

NA

-2.57

NA

NA

ModerateAerobics:Placebo

16

-2.18

-2.11

-7.08

4.96

0.31

HighAerobics:Topiramate

0

-2.15

NA

-2.15

NA

NA

ModerateAerobics:Topiramate

1

-1.20

0.05

-5.42

5.47

0.16

Topiramate:Placebo

1

-0.98

0.27

-5.20

5.47

0.16

HighAerobics:ModerateAerobics

2

-0.95

-0.36

-1.80

1.44

0.53

HighAerobics:StrengthTraining

0

0.42

NA

0.42

NA

NA

ModerateAerobics:StrengthTraining

0

1.37

NA

1.37

NA

NA

Amitriptyline:Placebo

0

3.82

NA

3.82

NA

NA

Amitriptyline:Topiramate

0

4.80

NA

4.80

NA

NA

Amitriptyline:ModerateAerobics

1

6

6

NA

NA

NA

Amitriptyline:HighAerobics

0

6.95

NA

6.95

NA

NA

Amitriptyline:StrengthTraining

0

7.37

NA

7.37

NA

NA

  1. NA not available, NMA network meta-analysis