Study | Design | Disease (N) | Control (N) | Ethnicity | Sample | Variant | Outcome | Genotype 1 | Genotype 2 | Genotype 3 | HWE | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lemos et al., 2010 [42] | Case-control study. The Authors state that sample size is a limitation of the study not providing enough power to detect a variant with an OR < 1.5. | Diagnosis according to the International Headache Society (IHS), using the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) I (before 2004) and II. N = 188 | People with no history of migraine, age-matched to cases N = 287 | Portuguese | Genomic DNA extraction from peripheral blood leucocytes | rs1553005 (CGRP) | 1) Investigate the role of BDNF in migraine susceptibility; 2) CGRP, studied for the first time as candidate gene in migraine; 3) possible interaction of BDNF and CGRP genes in migraine’s susceptibility. | GG: OR (95 %CI) 1.00 0), p= -; multivariable logistic regression analysis | GC: OR (95 %CI )1.40 (0.94–2.08), p = 0.09; multivariable logistic regression analysis | CC: OR (95 %CI) 0.86 (0.42–1.77), p = 0.69; multivariable logistic regression analysis | Case and control groups in HWE for the polymorphism | rs1553005(CGRP)*rs2049046(BDNF) = GC*AT – OR 1.88 (95 %CI 1.20–2.93), P = 0.005 |
Menon et al., 2011 [43] | Case-control study. Power analysis reported | Clinical diagnosis by an experienced clinical neurologist based on international criteria N = 278 | Individuals with no family history of migraine, age, sex and ethnicity matched to cases N = 322 | Australian (east coast) Caucasian:of European descent living in Australia, with ancestors emigrated within the last 160 years from the British Isles and other parts of Europe | Genomic DNA extraction from white blood cells | rs35815751 (16 bp deletion in intron 1 of the CALC A gene) | Invetigate the role of 16 bp deletion in the first intron of the CALCA gene in the risk of migraine | II (homozygous, insertion/insertion); no deletion/deletion OR (95 %CI) 1.2 (0.74–1.85) in migraine, for genotypes (P = 0.575) and for alleles (P = 0.502); logistic regression analysis | ID (heterozygous, insertion/deletion); no deletion/deletion OR (95 %CI) 1.1 (0.68–1.79) in migraine with aura, (genotypes, P = 0.666; alleles, P = 0.7); logistic regression analysis | DD (homozygous, deletion/deletion); no deletion/deletion OR (95 %CI) 1.6 (0.70–3.44) in migraine without aura, (genotypes, P = 0.325; alleles, P = 0.276); logistic regression analysis | Genotypes in HWE (migraineurs: PHWE=0.73 and controls: PHWE=0.247) | No association between rs35815751 and migraine for genotypes (P = 0.575) nor alleles (P = 0.502), and migraine with aura (genotypes, P = 0.666; alleles, P = 0.7) or without aura (genotypes, P = 0.325; alleles, P = 0.276) |
Guldiken et al., 2013 [44] | Case-control study on females. | Diagnosis of migraine by neurologist based on the criteria of ICHD-II. N = 134 | Healty volunteers, health care personal and postpartum females who were hospitalized in the obstetric clinic. N = 96 | Local (Turkish) | DNA isolation from peripheral blood | rs3781719 (SNP T-692 C of CALC A gene) | Investigated the frequency of CALCA T-692 C in migraineurs and its association to migraine attack frequency and severity | TT: 42.5 % | TC: 42.5 % | CC: 14.9 % | HWE has been evaluated. | No association between the genotype and allele frequency of migraine (P = 0.44), without and with aura (P = 0.52), and the severity and frequency of migraine attacks. Frequency of migraine attacks has been measured as the number of attacks in a month. The severity has been assessed with the visual analog scale |
Sutherland et al., 2013 [45] | Case-control study. Power analysis reported | Diagnosis by a clinical neurologist according to the IHS criteria. N = 284 | Matched for sex, age (+/−5 years) and ethnicity. N = 284 | South Eastern Australian: adult Caucasians of European descent living in Australia, with ancestors emigrated within the last 160 years from British Isles and other parts of Europe | DNA extraction from white blood cells | rs3781719 (SNP 624 (T/C) of the CALC A gene promoter) | Investigate the contribution of the 4 selected SNPs in the risk of migraine | TT: -migraine47.8 %; -migraine with aura 49.0 % -migraine without aura 45.7 % | TC: -migraine44.7 %; -migraine with aura 42.2 %; -migraine without aura 49.4 % | CC: -migraine7.5 %; -migraine with aura 8.8 %; -migraine without aura 4.9 % | HWE has been verified. Genotypes for SNPs were in HWE in case and control groups | No significant association with migraine (P = 0.260), migraine with aura (0.563) and migraine without aura (0.133) |
rs145837941 (4218T > C base-exchange in the coding sequence of CALC A) | TT: 94.9 % | TC: 4.7 % | CC: 0.4 % | No significant association with migraine (P = 0.913) | ||||||||
rs3754701 (SNP in the RAMP1 gene promoter at position − 1166 (T/A)) | TT: - migraine 37.4 %; - migraine with aura 42.1 %; - migraine without aura 30.6 % | TA: - migraine 49.4 %; - migraine with aura 44.8 %; - migraine without aura 56.1 % | AA: - migraine 13.2 %; - migraine with aura 13.1 %; - migraine without aura 13.3 % | No significant association with migraine (P = 0.360), migraine with aura (P = 0.276) and migraine without aura (P = 0.260) | ||||||||
rs7590387 ((G/C) 1.4 kb downstream of the RAMP1 gene) | GG: - migraine 25.7 %; - migraine with aura 23.9 %; - migraine without aura 28.4 % | GC: - migraine 54.4 %; - migraine with aura 54.3 %; - migraine without aura 54.5 % | CC: - migraine 19.9 %; - migraine with aura 21.7 %; - migraine without aura 17.0 % | No significant association with migraine (P = 0.341), migraine with aura (P = 0.566) and migraine without aura (P = 0.299) | ||||||||
Cargnin et al., 2015 [46] | Case-control study. Power calculation reported | Diagnosis fulfilling ICHD-II criteria for migraine without aura A for at least 1 year and for medication overuse headache (MOH) or previous or current diagnosis of MOH.Patients with migraine without aura and patients with MOH. N (migraine without aura) = 219; N (MOH) = 130 | Matched by age and sex and of same ethnicity. N = 209 | Italian (north-west) | DNA extraction from peripheral blood | rs3781719 [CALC A (T > C)] | Investigate the role of the two selected SNPs in: 1) risk of inconsistent response to triptans; 2) risk of trasformation of episodic migraine to MOH | TT: (A) OR (95 %CI) 0.96 (0.62–1.48), P = 0.84; logistic regression analysis adjusted for triptan (frovatriptan vs. other triptans), and for polymorphisms, associated with triptan response. A = log-additive model of inheritance; D = dominant model of inheritance; R = recessive model of inheritance | TC: (D) OR (95 %CI) 1.04 (0.59–1.85), P = 0.88; logistic regression analysis adjusted for triptan (frovatriptan vs. other triptans), and for polymorphisms, associated with triptan response. A = log-additive model of inheritance; D = dominant model of inheritance; R = recessive model of inheritance | CC: (R) OR (95 %CI) 0.80 (0.30–2.11), P = 0.65; logistic regression analysis adjusted for triptan (frovatriptan vs. other triptans), and for polymorphisms, associated with triptan response. A = log-additive model of inheritance; D = dominant model of inheritance; R = recessive model of inheritance | HWE tested. PHWE rs3781719 = 0.52; PHWE rs3754701 = 0.77; PHWE rs7590387 = 0.41. For only MOH patients: (PHWE rs3781719 = 0.18; PHWE rs3754701 = 1; PHWE rs7590387 = 0.69) | No significant association for endpoint 1 [risk of inconsistent response to triptans (being consistent responders defined as patients experiencing a ≥ 2 point reduction after triptan administration in at least 2 out of 3 consecutive attacks)]; significant association of RAMP1rs7590387GG [OR (95 %CI) (R) 0.27 (0.13–0.57) P = 0.0002)] for endpoint 2 (risk of trasformation of episodic migraine to MOH) |
rs3754701 [RAMP 1 (T > A)] | TT; (A) OR (95 %CI) 0.90 (0.60–1.37), P = 0.63; logistic regression analysis adjusted for triptan (frovatriptan vs. other triptans), and for polymorphisms, associated with triptan response. A = log-additive model of inheritance; D = dominant model of inheritance; R = recessive model of inheritance | TA; (D) OR (95 %CI) 0.73 (0.41–1.32), P = 0.30; logistic regression analysis adjusted for triptan (frovatriptan vs. other triptans), and for polymorphisms, associated with triptan response. A = log-additive model of inheritance; D = dominant model of inheritance; R = recessive model of inheritance | AA; (R) OR (95 %CI) 1.19 (0.53–2.67), P = 0.66; logistic regression analysis adjusted for triptan (frovatriptan vs. other triptans), and for polymorphisms, associated with triptan response. A = log-additive model of inheritance; D = dominant model of inheritance; R = recessive model of inheritance | |||||||||
rs7590387 [RAMP 1 (C > G)] | CC: (A) OR (95 %CI) 1.11 (0.75–1.65), P = 0.60; logistic regression analysis adjusted for triptan (frovatriptan vs. other triptans), and for polymorphisms, associated with triptan response. A = log-additive model of inheritance; D = dominant model of inheritance; R = recessive model of inheritance | CG: (D) OR (95 %CI) 0.84 (0.46–1.54), P = 0.57; logistic regression analysis adjusted for triptan (frovatriptan vs. other triptans), and for polymorphisms, associated with triptan response. A = log-additive model of inheritance; D = dominant model of inheritance; R = recessive model of inheritance | GG: (R) OR (95 %CI) 1.69 (0.86–3.30), P = 0.12; logistic regression analysis adjusted for triptan (frovatriptan vs. other triptans), and for polymorphisms, associated with triptan response. A = log-additive model of inheritance; D = dominant model of inheritance; R = recessive model of inheritance | |||||||||
Wan et al., 2015 [48] | Exploratory analysis. Limitations reported by the Authors: small sample, the analysis could not be conducted on the specific tissue derived from trigeminovascular or cerebral biopsies,the blood DNA was from multiple cell lineages with likely different DNA methylation | Migraineurs recruited at International Headache Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital. N = 26 | Matched healthy controls with no significant differences in gender and age compared to migraineurs group. N = 25 | Patients recruited at International Headache Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital | DNA extraction from EDTA blood samples obtained through the cubital vein | Analysis of CpG islands of the RAMP1 gene in a 3000 bp region including putative promoter sequences and the first exon | Investigate if the methylation pattern of the promoter of RAMP1 gene in peripheral leukocyte is associated with migraine | Low methylation trend without statistical significance in migraine vs. control (total average methylation level: 8.41 % ±1.92 % vs. 9.90 % ± 3.88 %, P = 0.197) | The ROC the curve and Youden criterion have been used for the determination of the optimum cut-off of methylation level | No significant difference in the DNA methylation pattern of RAMP 1 between migraine and control groups | ||
Moreno-Mayordomo et al., 2019 [47] | Prospective, observational, multicentre, study enrolling female participants. Sample power calculation reported | Diagnosis of chronic migraine according to ICHD- III edition, beta version. classified as responders to onabotulinum toxinA (defined as defined as a reduction of at least 50 % in the number of monthly migraine days 3 months after the second administration. N = 117 | Diagnosis of chronic migraine according to ICHD- III edition, beta version. classified as non responders to onabotulinum toxinA. N = 33 | Caucasian ethnicity and Spanish origin | Genomic DNA extraction from peripheral blood anticoagulated in EDTA-K3 | rs3781719 (CALC A) | Investigate the effect of rs3781719 on the response to OnabotulinumtoxinA | TT: 53.85 % responders and 27.27 % non responders | TC: 38.46 % responders and 63.63 % non responders | CC: 7.69 % responders and 9.09 % non responders | All of the variants wer in HWE Apart from rs222749 of TRPV 1 gene. | Significant differences in risk to lack of response to onabotulim toxin A for the SNP rs3781719 of gene CALC A: OR (95 %CI) (dominant model) 3,11 (1,33 − 7,26), (codominant model) 1,6 (0,85 − 3,0), (recessive model) 1,2 (0,31 − 4,71) |