Skip to main content

Table 4 Results and analyses of difference ERP components

From: Female versus male migraine: an event-related potential study of visual neurocognitive processing

   Migraineurs Healthy controls Statistics
Difference ERPs   Males Females Males Females Group F(1,88) Gender F(1,88) Group × Gender F(1,88)
P3dT Amplitude (μV) 5.061 ± 2.200 3.086 ± 1.668 5.698 ± 3.109 6.367 ± 3.840 20.225*** 2.245 9.215**
Latency (ms) 428.406 ± 34.649 417.841 ± 39.290 423.594 ± 37.222 415.478 ± 36.722 0.407 2.760 0.047
P3dN Amplitude (μV) 5.606 ± 2.007 3.787 ± 1.740 6.288 ± 2.137 6.950 ± 3.440 26.334*** 2.383 10.955**
Latency (ms) 387.754 ± 36.008 395.580 ± 35.748 396.464 ± 32.580 384.058 ± 38.505 0.056 0.148 2.890
P2dN Amplitude (μV) 4.529 ± 2.628 3.072 ± 2.208 4.407 ± 2.283 4.922 ± 2.651 6.643* 1.974 8.650**
Latency (ms) 165.362 ± 34.496 162.971 ± 32.135 176.594 ± 35.897 170.522 ± 37.271 2.867 0.582 0.110
  1. Data were expressed as mean ± SD
  2. P3dT, P3dN and P2dN represent the P3 target effect (target minus standard), P3 and P2 novel effects (novel minus standard), respectively
  3. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 by repeated-measures ANOVA (Bonferroni correction)
\