From: Are the current IHS guidelines for migraine drug trials being followed?
Acute |
Selection of patients |
Do the diagnostic criteria conform to those of the IHS? (+1/+0) |
Trial design |
Is the trial double blind? (+1/+0) |
Is the trial placebo-controlled? (+1/+0) |
Were the trial participants randomized at entry to the trial? (+1/+0) |
Evaluation of results |
IHS recommended |
Is the percentage of patients pain-free at 2 h used as a primary measure of efficacy? (+1/+0) |
Is sustained pain-free (percentage of patients pain-free within 2 h with no use of rescue medication or relapse within 48 h) used as a measure of efficacy? (+1/+0) |
Is “headache relief” (percentage of patients with a decrease in headache from severe or moderate to none or mild within 2 h before any rescue medication) used as a measure of efficacy? (+1/+0) |
Other |
Is the percentage of patients pain-free at 2 h used as a secondary measure of efficacy? |
Is sustained pain-free (percentage of patients pain-free within 2 h with no use of rescue medication or relapse within 24 h) used as a measure of efficacy? |
Prophylaxis |
Selection of patients |
Do the diagnostic criteria conform to those of the IHS? (+1/+0) |
Do the patients’ attacks of migraine occur 2–6 times per month? (+1/+0) |
Trial design |
Is the trial double blind? (+1/+0) |
Is the trial placebo-controlled? (+1/+0) |
Were the trial participants randomized at entry to the trial? (+1/+0) |
Were the trial participants stratified for frequency of migraine attacks occurring during baseline? (+1/+0) |
Are treatment periods of at least 3 months used? (+1/+0) |
Evaluation of results |
IHS recommended |
Is frequency of migraine attacks per 4 weeks used as a primary measure of efficacy? (+1/+0) |
Is the number of days with migraine per 4 weeks used as a measure of efficacy? (+1/+0) |
Other |
Is the number of days with headache per 4 weeks used as a measure of efficacy? |