Skip to main content

Acupuncture for tension-type headache: a multicentre, sham-controlled, patient-and observer-blinded, randomised trial

Abstract

Acupuncture treatment is frequently sought for tension-type headache (TTH), but there is conflicting evidence as to its effectiveness. This randomised, controlled, multicentre, patient-and observer-blinded trial was carried out in 122 outpatient practices in Germany on 409 patients with TTH, defined as ≥0 headache days per month of which ≤1 included migraine symptoms. Interventions were verum acupuncture according to the practice of traditional Chinese medicine or sham acupuncture consisting of superficial needling at nonacupuncture points. Acupuncture was administered by physicians with specialist acupuncture training. Ten 30-min sessions were given over a six-week period, with additional sessions available for partial response. Response was defined as >50% reduction in headache days/month at six months and no use of excluded concomitant medication or other therapies. In the intent-to-treat analysis (all 409 patients), 33% of verum patients and 27% of sham controls (p=0.18) were classed as responders. Verum was superior to sham for most secondary endpoints, including headache days (1.8 fewer; 95% CI 0.6, 3.0; p=0.004) and the International Headache Society response criterion (66% vs. 55% response, risk difference 12%, 95% CI: 2%-21%; p=0.024).). The relative risk on the primary and secondary response criterion was very similar (0.8); the difference in statistical significance may be due to differences in event rate. TTH improves after acupuncture treatment. However, the degree to which treatment benefits depend on psychological compared to physiological effects and the degree to which any physiological effects depend on needle placement and insertion depth are unclear.

References

  1. 1.

    Olesen J, Bousser M-G, Diener HC et al (2004) The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia, 24[Suppl 1] 9–160 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2003.00824.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Göbel H, Petersen-Braun M, Soyka D (1994) The epidemiology of headache in Germany: a nationwide survey of a representative sample on the basis of the headache classification of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 14:97–106 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1994.1402097.x, 8062362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rasmussen BK (2001) Epidemiology of headache. Cephalalgia 21:774–777 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2001.00248.x, 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrkvVKrsA%3D%3D, 11595011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Schwartz BS, Stewart WF, Simon D, Lipton RB (1998) Epidemiology of tension-type headache. JAMA 279:381–383 10.1001/jama.279.5.381, 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7hvFGlsg%3D%3D, 9459472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Thomas KJ, Nicholl JP, Fall M (2001) Access to complementary medicine via general practice. Br J Gen Pract 51:25–30 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ntFGntA%3D%3D, 11271869

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wadlow G, Peringer E (1996) Retrospective survey of patients of practitioners of traditional Chinese acupuncture in the UK. Complementary therapies in medicine 4:1–7 10.1016/S0965-2299(96)80048-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ezzo J, Berman B, Hadhazy VA, Jadad AR, Lao L, Singh BB (2000) Is acupuncture effective for the treatment of chronic pain? A systematic review. Pain 86:217–225 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00304-8, 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3nsVSlsA%3D%3D, 10812251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Melchart D, Linde K, Fischer P et al (2001) Acupuncture for idiopathic headache. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online), (1):CD001218

  9. 9.

    Endres HG, Zenz M, Schaub C et al (2005) Zur Problematik von Akupunkturstudien am Beispiel der Methodik von gerac. Schmerz 19:201–204, 206, 208–210 passim 10.1007/s00482-004-0345-z, 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MzhtFyltg%3D%3D, 15959826

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Diener HC (2004) Advances in the field of headache 2003/2004. Current opinion in neurology, 17:271–273 10.1097/00019052-200406000-00006, 15167060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Anonymous (1998) NIH Consensus Conference. Acupuncture. JAMA 280:1518–1524

  12. 12.

    Molsberger AF, Boewing G, Diener HC et al (2006) Designing an acupuncture study: the nationwide, randomized, controlled, german acupuncture trials on migraine and tension-type headache. Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y. 12:237–245 10.1089/acm.2006.12.237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Elliott AM, Smith BH, Smith WC, Chambers WA (2000) Changes in chronic pain severity over time: the Chronic Pain Grade as a valid measure. Pain 88:303–308 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00337-7, 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7gtlSkuw%3D%3D, 11068118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF (1992) Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 50:133–149 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Smith BH, Penny KI, Purves AM et al (1997) The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research. Pain 71:141–147 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)03347-2, 1:STN:280:DyaK2szlsFarsg%3D%3D, 9211475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ware J, Jr., Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical care 34:220–233 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003, 8628042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Collins SL, Edwards J, Moore RA, Smith LA, McQuay HJ (2001) Seeking a simple measure of analgesia for mega-trials: is a single global assessment good enough? Pain 91:189–194 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00435-8, 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzmvVCrtQ%3D%3D, 11240091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Endres HG, Molsberger A, Lungenhausen M, Trampisch HJ (2004) An internal standard for verifying the accuracy of serious adverse event reporting: the example of an acupuncture study of 190,924 patients. European journal of medical research 9:545–551 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FmtV2msw%3D%3D, 15689300

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Schulte-Mattler WJ, Krack P (2004) Treatment of chronic tension-type headache with botulinum toxin A: a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled multicenter study. Pain 109:110–114 10.1016/j.pain.2004.01.016, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjtVCgurk%3D, 15082132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Saper JR, Lake AE, 3rd, Cantrell DT, Winner PK, White JR (2002) Chronic daily headache prophylaxis with tizanidine: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter outcome study. Headache 42:470–482 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2002.02122.x, 12167135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Holroyd KA, O’Donnell FJ, Stensland M, Lipchik GL, Cordingley GE, Carlson BW (2001). Management of chronic tension-type headache with tricyclic antidepressant medication, stress management therapy, and their combination: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 285:2208–2215 10.1001/jama.285.17.2208, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjslymsLs%3D, 11325322

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Diener HC, Kronfeld K, Boewing G et al (2006) Efficacy of acupuncture for the prophylaxis of migraine: a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet Neurol 5:310–316 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70382-9, 16545747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Coeytaux RR, Kaufman JS, Kaptchuk TJ et al (2005) A randomized, controlled trial of acupuncture for chronic daily headache. Headache 45:1113–1123 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.00235.x, 16178942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Vickers AJ, Rees RW, Zollman CE et al (2004) Acupuncture for chronic headache in primary care: large, pragmatic, randomised trial. Br Med J (Clinical research ed 328:744–749 10.1136/bmj.38029.421863.EB

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Moerman DE, Jonas WB (2002) Deconstructing the Placebo Effect and Finding the Meaning Response. Ann Intern Med 136:471–476 11900500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kaptchuk TJ, Goldman P, Stone DA, Stason WB (2000) Do medical devices have enhanced placebo effects? Clin Epidemid 53:786–792 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00206-7, 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvjvVSrsg%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kaptchuk TJ, Stason WB, Davis RB et al (2006) Sham device v inert pill: randomised controlled trial of two placebo treatments. BMJ (Clinical research ed, 332:391–397 10.1136/bmj.38726.603310.55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Birch S, Jamison RN (1998) Controlled trial of Japanese acupuncture for chronic myofascial neck pain: assessment of specific and nonspecific effects of treatment. Clin J Pain 14:248–255 10.1097/00002508-199809000-00012, 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvivFSnsA%3D%3D, 9758075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Melchart D, Streng A, Hoppe A et al (2005) Acupuncture in patients with tension-type headache: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J (Clinical research ed 331:376–382 10.1136/bmj.38512.405440.8F

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heinz G. Endres.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Endres, H.G., Böwing, G., Diener, H. et al. Acupuncture for tension-type headache: a multicentre, sham-controlled, patient-and observer-blinded, randomised trial. J Headache Pain 8, 306–314 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10194-007-0416-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Episodic tension-type headache
  • Chronic tension-type headache
  • Verum acupuncture
  • Sham acupuncture
  • Randomised controlled trial