Skip to content


  • Open Access

Reading data in migraine acute treatment studies: from clinical trials to reviews and meta-analyses

The Journal of Headache and Pain20067:295

  • Received: 5 May 2006
  • Accepted: 27 May 2006
  • Published:


The huge amount of data regarding triptans in clinical practice provides a great opportunity to learn about their efficacy, tolerability and adverse events and offers to the clinician the background for the best treatment option in any patient, given that the patient is suitable for being treated with any of those compounds. A detailed clinical history is necessary in order to make a preliminary selection of triptan-suitable or -unsuitable migraine patients. Among the former, a secondary selection may be made, to recognise different attacks that can be successfully treated with different triptans, according to attack presentation and progression, within the same patient. Reading single original articles has become very difficult. Therefore, data are often presented in review form, which may be too partial or oriented. Systematic reviews or meta-analyses better serve to comment on data as they follow an analytic method that is based upon pooling data from original articles and comparing them using statistical aids.

Key words

  • Migraine
  • Triptans
  • Clinical trial
  • Meta-analysis


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.