Skip to main content

Table 5 Number of quality assessment criteria addressed by individual studies

From: A systematic review of economic evaluations of pharmacological treatments for adults with chronic migraine

Journal articles

 

Batty AJ, et al

Giannouchos TV, et al

Hansson-Hedblom A, et al

Hollier-Hann G, et al

Lipton RB, et al

Mahon R, et al

Ruggeri, et al.

Sussman M, et al

Vekov, et al

CHEERS 2022 (n = 28)

 Yes

25

23

23

23

22

25

23

25

12

 No

2

2

2

3

2

2

2

2

10

 Partial

1

3

3

2

4

1

3

1

6

 Unclear

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Not applicable

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PHILIPS CRITERIA (n = 57)

 Yes

51

50

50

49

51

51

50

51

20

 No

3

4

4

6

4

3

3

3

16

 Partial

3

3

2

2

2

2

2

3

9

 Unclear

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

10

 Not applicable

0

0

1

0

0

1

1

0

2

Other reports

 

CADTH (Botox)

CADTH (Erenumab)

ICER

NICE (Erenumab)

NICE (Fremanezumab)

NICE (Galcenzenumab)

Warwick Evidence (Botox)

 

CHEERS 2022 (n = 27)

 Yes

27

26

25

27

27

27

24

 

 No

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 

 Partial

0

1

2

0

0

0

3

 

 Unclear

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

 Not applicable

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

PHILIPS CRITERIA (n = 57)

 Yes

50

49

52

53

54

55

55

 

 No

3

2

1

2

1

0

0

 

 Partial

4

6

4

1

1

1

2

 

 Unclear

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

 

 Not applicable

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Â