Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies and outcome events

From: The efficacy and safety of atogepant for the prophylactic treatment of migraine: evidence from randomized controlled trials

Study

Countries

Centers

Publication

Type of migraine

Treatment group,

(No. of participants)

Total number

Age range

Female (%)

Mean age ± SD (year)

Study period

Outcome Events

Goadsby et al

2020

(NCT02848326)

USA

78

Lancet Neurol

episodic

Atogepant 10 mg QD (93)

vs.30 mg QD (183)

vs.60 mg QD (186)

vs.30 mg BID (86)

vs.60 mg BID (91)

vs. PLA (186)

825

18y-75y

10 mg QD: 88

30 mg QD: 91

60 mg QD: 84

30 mg BID: 85

60 mg BID: 91

PLA: 83

10 mg QD:39.4 ± 12.4

30 mg QD:41.0 ± 13.6

60 mg QD:40.4 ± 11.7

30 mg BID:38.5 ± 11.2

60 mg BID:39.7 ± 11.9

PLA:40.5 ± 11.7

12w

a b c d e

Ailani et al

2021

(NCT03777059)

USA

138

NEJM

episodic

Atogepant 10 mg QD (221)

vs.30 mg QD (228)

vs.60 mg QD (231)

vs. PLA (222)

902

18y-80y

10 mg QD: 90.5

30 mg QD: 89.5

60 mg QD: 86.1

PLA: 89.2

10 mg QD:41.1 ± 12.0

30 mg QD:42.1 ± 11.7

60 mg QD:42.5 ± 12.4

PLA: 40.3 ± 12.8

12w

a b c d e

f g h

Allergan et al

2021

(NCT03700320)

USA

112

/

episodic

Atogepant 60 mg QD

739

18y-80y

60 mg QD: 88.2

PLA: 87.8

60 mg QD: 41.1 ± 12.1

PLA: 42.5 ± 12.03

52w

a

  1. PLA placebo, w weeks a Adverse Events (AEs), b monthly migraine days (MMDs), c Monthly headache days, d Monthly medication use days, e ≥ 50% reduction in monthly migraine days, f Score on Role Function–Restrictive domain of MSQ, g Score on Performance of Daily Activities domain of AIM-D, h Score on Physical Impairment domain of AIM-D