Skip to main content

Table 2 Data extracted from identified studies

From: Prevalence of familial cluster headache: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Country

Authors

Study Design

Diagnostic Criteria

Method of data acquisition

Sample size (n)

Probands with FAMILY HISTORY of CH (n, %)

Probands with FAMILY HISTORY (M)

Probands with FAMILY HISTORY (F)

USA

Kudrow and Kudrow (1994) [27]

Retrospective Study

• Adhoc Committee on classification of headache 1962

• ICHD-1

• Proband interview

• Semi-structured phone interview

• Direct examination

300

26 (8.6%)

7

19

Denmark

Russell et al (1996) [28]

Retrospective Study

• ICHD-1

• Questionnaire

• Semi-structured phone interview

• Direct examination

366

25 (6.8%)

17

9

Italian

Montagna et al (1998) [13]

Retrospective Study

• ICHD-1

• Semi-structured phone interview

222

5 (2.25%)

NA

NA

French

El Amrani et al (2002) [29]

Consecutive case- series

• ICHD-1

• Direct examination

220

44 (10.75%)

12

8

Italian

Torelli and Manzoni (2003) [30]

Retrospective Study

• ICHD-1

• Semi-structured phone interview

186

20 (4.34%)

30

8

Italian

Taga et al (2015) [31]

Retrospective Study

• ICHD3β

• Clinical documentation

691

40 (4.92%)

28

12

Italian

Leone et al (2001) [14]

Retrospective Study

• ICHD-1

• Semi-structured phone interview

Direct examination

785

44 (20%)

29

15

UK

O’Connor et al (2020)a

Retrospective Study

• ICHD3β

• Semi-structured phone interview

• Direct examination

645

48 (7.44%)

35

13

  1. CH cluster headache, F Female, ICHD International Classification of Headache Disorders, M Male, NA Not available
  2. aO’Connor et al. represents unpublished local cohort